Mixing Individual Incentives and Group Incentives: Best of Both Worlds or Social Dilemma?

Abstract

Equity theory emphasizes making distinctions between individual contributions to teams and then recognizing these with differentiations in rewards. However, social interdependence theory emphasizes maximizing cooperation in teams by compensating members equally. Several researchers have advocated offsetting the limitations of individually based incentives and group-based incentives by mixing the two. However, the authors contend that this puts team members in a social dilemma, leading them to focus on the individually based component. The authors find that in comparison to group-based only incentives, mixed individual/group incentives lead team members to perform faster but less accurately and focus on their own taskwork to the detriment of backing up behavior.

Keywords

interdependence teamwork compensation incentives teams groups social dilemma

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. S.

1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422-436.

Adams

J. S.

1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2: 267-296. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Allison

S. T.

Kerr

N. L.

1994. Group correspondence biases and the provision of public-goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 688-698.

Anderson

C. A.

Lindsay

A. J.

Bushman

B. J.

1999. Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8: 3-9.

Anderson

C. M.

Camerer

C. F.

2000. Experience-weighted attraction learning in sender–receiver signaling games. Economic Theory, 16: 689-718.

Aram

J. D.

1989. The paradox of interdependent relations in the field of social—Issues in management. Academy of Management Review, 14: 266-283.

Axelrod

1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

Baldwin

T. T.

Bommer

W. H.

Rubin

R. S.

2007. Developing management skills: What great managers know and do. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Barnes

C. M.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

2009. Sleep deprivation and teams: Burning the midnight oil or playing with fire? Academy of Management Review, 34: 56-66.

10.

Barnes

C. M.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Wagner

D. T.

DeRue

D. S.

Nahrgang

J. D.

Schwind

K. M.

2008. Harmful help: The costs of backing up behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 529-539.

11.

Beersma

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Humphrey

S. E.

Moon

Conlon

D. E.

Ilgen

D. R.

2003. Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 572-590.

12.

Berkowitz

Donnerstein

1982. External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. American Psychologist, 37: 245-257.

13.

Bornstein

Ben-Yossef

1994. Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 52-67.

14.

Bowers

C. A.

Braun

C. C.

Morgan

B. B.

1997. Team workload: Its meaning and measurement. In Brannick

M. T.

Salas

Prince

(Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 85-108. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Brann

Foddy

1987. Trust and the consumption of a deteriorating common resource. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31: 615-630.

16.

Colquitt

J. A.

2008. Publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 616-620.

17.

Coombs

C. H.

1973. Reparameterization of prisoner’s dilemma game. Behavioral Science, 18: 424-428.

18.

Dawes

R. M.

1980. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 169-193.

19.

DeMatteo

J. S.

Eby

L. T.

Sundstrom

1998. Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 141-183.

20.

Deutsch

1949. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2: 129-152.

21.

Devine

D. J.

Clayton

L. D.

Philips

J. L.

Dunford

B. B.

Melner

S. B.

1999. Teams in organizations—Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30: 678-711.

22.

Dipboye

R. L.

Flanagan

M. M.

1979. Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology. American Psychologist, 34: 141-150.

23.

Hackman

J. R.

1990. Groups that work and those that don’t: Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

24.

Heneman

R. L.

von Hippel

1995. Balancing group and individual rewards: Rewarding individual contributions to the team. Compensation and Benefits Review, 274: 63-68.

25.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Moon

Ellis

A. P. J.

West

B. J.

Ilgen

D. R.

Sheppard

Porter

C. O. L. H.

Wagner

J. A.

2002. Structural contingency theory and individual differences: Examination of external and internal person–team fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 599-606.

26.

Ilgen

D. R.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Johnson

M. D.

Jundt

2005. Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 517-534.

27.

Jenkins

G. D.

Mitra

Gupta

Shaw

J. D.

1998. Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 777-787.

28.

Johnson

M. D.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Humphrey

S. E.

Ilgen

D. R.

Jundt

Meyer

C. J.

2006. Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 103-119.

29.

Karau

S. J.

Williams

K. D.

1993. Social loafing—A meta analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 681-706.

30.

Kelley

H. H.

Grzelak

1972. Conflict between individual and common interest in an N-person relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21: 190-200.

31.

Komorita

S. S.

Barth

J. M.

1985. Components of reward in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 364-373.

32.

Komorita

S. S.

Lapworth

C. W.

1982. Cooperative choice among individuals versus groups in an N-person dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 487-496.

33.

Komorita

S. S.

Parks

C. D.

Hulbert

L. G.

1992. Reciprocity and the induction of cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62: 607-617.

34.

Koole

S. L.

Jager

van den Berg

A. E.

Vlek

C. A. J.

Hofstee

W. K. B.

2001. On the social nature of personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 289-301.

35.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Ilgen

D. R.

2006. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7: 77-124.

36.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-376.

37.

McIntyre

R. M.

Salas

1995. Measuring and managing for team performance: Lessons from complex environments. In Guzzo

R. A.

Salas

(Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations:9-45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

38.

Mitchell

T. R.

Silver

W. S.

1990. Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent—Effects on task strategies and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 185-193.

39.

Mook

D. G.

1983. In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38: 379-387.

40.

Murnighan

J. K.

1994. Game theory and organizational behavior. In Staw

B. M.

Cummings

L. L.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior:83-123. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

41.

Noe

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Gerhart

B. A.

Wright

P. M.

2008. Human resource management: Gaining competitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill.

42.

O’Connell

2008. Retailers reprogram workers in efficiency push. The Wall Street Journal, September 10: A1.

43.

Olson

1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

44.

Parker

McAdams

Zielinksi

(2000). Rewarding teams: Lessons from the trenches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

45.

Pearsall

M. J.

Ellis

A. P. J.

Stein

J. H.

2009. Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109: 18-28.

46.

Petty

M. M.

Singleton

Connell

D. W.

1992. An experimental evaluation of an organizational incentive plan in the electric utility industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 427-436.

47.

Pfeffer

1995. Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 9: 55-72.

48.

Porter

C. O. L. H.

2005. Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 811-818.

49.

Porter

C. O. L. H.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Ilgen

D. R.

Ellis

A. P. J.

West

B. J.

Moon

2003. Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 391-403.

50.

Probst

T. M.

Carnevale

P. J.

Triandis

H. C.

1999. Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77: 171-191.

51.

Pruitt

D. G.

Kimmel

M. J.

1977. 20 years of experimental gaming—Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28: 363-392.

52.

Quigley

N. R.

Tesluk

P. E.

Locke

E. A.

Bortol

K. M.

2007. A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18: 71-88.

53.

Rapoport

1987. Research paradigms and expected utility: Models for the provision of step-level public-goods. Psychological Review, 94: 74-83.

54.

Rapoport

Eshedlevy

1989. Provision of step-level public-goods—Effects of greed and fear of being gypped. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44: 325-344.

55.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

56.

Shaw

J. D.

Gupta

Delery

J. E.

2002. Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 491-512.

57.

Sniezek

J. A.

May

D. R.

Sawyer

J. E.

1990. Social uncertainty and interdependence—A study of resource-allocation decisions in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46: 155-180.

58.

Triandis

H. C.

1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

59.

Van de kragt

A. J. C.

Orbell

J. M.

Dawes

R. M.

1983. The minimal contributing set as a solution to public-goods problems. American Political Science Review, 77: 112-122.

60.

Wade-Benzoni

K. A.

Okumura

Brett

J. M.

Moore

D. A.

Tenbrunsel

A. E.

Bazerman

M. H.

2002. Cognitions and behavior in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison of two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 87-95.

61.

Wageman

1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 145-180.

62.

Wageman

2001. The meaning of independence. In Turner

M. E.

(Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research: 100-110. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

63.

Wagner

J. A.

1995. Studies of individualism-collectivism—Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 152-172.

64.

Welbourne

T. M.

Gomez Mejia

L. R.

1995. Gainsharing—A critical-review and a future-research agenda. Journal of Management, 21: 559-609.

65.

Wonderlic Associates. 1983. Wonderlic personnel test manual. Northfield, IL: Author.

66.

Yamagishi

Sato

1986. Motivational bases of the public-goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 67-73.