Drawing on prior research on staffing sufficiency theory, we hypothesized that individuals working in understaffed groups would experience higher levels of perceived task scope and utilization of skills, and that these task perceptions would lead to higher levels of organizational commitment and work performance. Data were gathered from 684 workers from 160 blue-collar groups and 55 white-collar groups. Our path analyses indicated that moderate levels of understaffing were associated with higher levels of task perceptions and commitment for both blue-collar and white-collar individuals. But only for the white-collar sample did task perceptions, in turn, lead to higher performance. At the group level of analysis, however, understaffing was associated with lower levels of group performance. We suggest that these findings have important implications for organizations and departments that are considering structural downsizing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barker, R.G. (1960). Ecology and motivation. In M. Jones (Ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
2.
Barker, R.G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
Barker, R.G. & Gump, P.V. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Barker, R.G. & Wright, H.F. (1955). Midwest and its children: The psychological ecology of an American town. New York: Row, Peterson.
5.
Bechtel, R.B. (1974). The undermanned environment: A universal theory? In D.H. Carson (Ed.), Man environment interactions, Part VIII. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchison and Ross.
6.
Brockner, J. (1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research, theory and practice. Pp. 213-255 in B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organization behavior, Vol. IO. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
Caplan, R., Cobb, S., French, J., Harrison, R.V. & Pinneau, S. (1975). Job demands and worker health. Washington, DC: HEW publication No. NIOSH 75-160.
8.
Greenberg, C. (1979). Toward an integration of ecological psychology and industrial psychology: Undermanning theory, organization size, and job enrichment. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 314228-242.
9.
Greenberg, CL, Wang, Y. & Dossett, D.L. (1982). Effects of work group size and task size on observers’ job characteristics ratings. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3: 53-66.
10.
Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 159-170.
11.
Meyer, J.P, Paunonen, S.V., Gellatly, I.R., Goflin, R.D. & Jackson, D.N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 152-156.
12.
Mowday, R., Steers, R. & Porter, L. (1978). Th&e managment of organizational commitment: A progress report. Technical report No. 15, Department of Management, University of Oregon, Eugene.
