Nonsurvey methods, including methods of constructing regional input-output tables, reconciling estimates, and deriving sectoral multipliers where no input-output table exists, are critically evaluated from a theoretical point of view as well as in the light of available evidence. There are a number of weaknesses in the way many techniques are utilized, and there are decided advantages in pursuing an interregional or multiregional approach. The continuing claims about the accuracy of existing methods are also examined in the context of the efficacy of various test procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alagh, Y. K.
, Subrahmanian, K. K. and Kashap, S. P.1971. Interregional industrial structure in a developing country: a conceptual frame with a case study. Journal of Regional Science11, 3: 301-316.
2.
Batten, D. F.1982. The interregional linkages between national and regional input-output models. International Regional Science Review7, 1: 53-68.
3.
Boster, R. S.
and Martin, W. E.1972. The value of primary versus secondary data in interindustry analysis: a study in the economics of the economic models. Annals of Regional Science6, 2: 35-43.
4.
Burford, R. L.
and Katz, J. L.1981. A method for estimation of input-output-type multipliers when no I-0 model exists. Journal of Regional Science21, 3: 151-161.
5.
Byron, R. P.1978. The estimation of large scale social accounts matrices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A141: 359-367.
6.
Cartwright, J. B.
, Beemiller, R. M., and Gustely, R. D.1981. RIMS II: Regional Input-Output Modelling System: estimation, evaluation, and application of a disaggregated regional impact model. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
7.
CONSAD
. 1967. Regional federal procurement study. U.S. Department of Commerce, Contract 7-35 211.
8.
Conway, R. S.1975. A note on the stability of regional interindustry models. Journal of Regional Science15, 1: 67-72.
9.
Conway, R. S.1977. The stability of regional input-output multipliers. Environment and Planning A9: 177-214.
10.
Czamanski, S.
and Malizia, E. E.1969. Applicability and limitations in the use of national input-output tables for regional studies. Papers and Proceedings, Regional Science Association23: 65-77.
11.
Davis, H. C.1976. Regional sectoral multipliers with reduced data requirements. International Regional Science Review1, 2: 18-29.
12.
Drake, R. L.1976. A short-cut to estimates of regional input-output multipliers: methodology and evaluation. International Regional Science Review1, 2: 1-17.
13.
Gerking, S. D.1976. Reconciling "rows only" and "columns only" coefficients in an input-model model. International Regional Science Review1, 2: 30-46.
14.
Gerking, S. D.1979. Reconciling reconciliation procedures in regional input-out-put analysis. International Regional Science Review4, 1: 23-36.
15.
Giarratani, F.1975. A note on the McMenamin-Haring input-output projection technique. Journal of Regional Science15, 3: 371-373.
16.
Gordon, I. R.1976. Gravity demand functions, accessibility and regional trade. Regional Studies10: 25-37.
17.
Greytak, D.1967. A statistical analysis of regional export-estimating techniques. Journal of Regional Science9, 3: 387-397.
18.
Harrigan, F. J.1982a. The relationship between industrial and geographical link-ages: a case study of the United Kingdom. Journal of Regional Science32, 1: 19-31.
19.
Harrigan, F. J.1982b. The estimation of input-output type output multipliers when no input-output model exists: a comment. Journal of Regional Science22, 3: 375-381.
20.
Harrigan, F. J.
and McNicoll, I. J.1981. Superior information and nonsurvey location quotient input-output simulations: observations on method and practice. Strathclyde: Fraser of Allander Institute, U.K., Discussion Paper No. 19.
21.
Harrigan, F. J.
, McGilvray, J. W. and McNicoll, I. J.1980a. Simulating the structure of a regional economy. Environment and Planning A12: 927-936.
22.
Harrigan, F. J.
, McGilvray, J. W. and McNicoll, I. J.1980b. A comparison of regional and technical structures. Economic Journal90: 795-810.
23.
Harrigan, F. J.
, McGilvray, J. W. and McNicoll, I. J.1981. The estimation of interregional trade flows. Journal of Regional Science21, 1: 65-78.
24.
Hewings, G. J. D.1971. Regional input-output models in the U.K.: some problems and prospects for the use of nonsurvey techniques. Regional Studies5: 11-22.
25.
Hewings, G. J. D.1977. Evaluating the possibilities for exchanging regional input-output coefficients. Environment and Planning A9: 927-944.
26.
Hewings, G. J. D.
and Janson, B. N.1980. Exchanging regional input-output coefficients: a reply and further comments. Environment and Planning A12: 843-854.
27.
Isard, W.1951. Interregional and regional 1-0 analysis: a model of a space economy. Review of Economics and Statistics33: 318-328.
28.
Isard, W.1953a. Some empirical results and problems of regional 1-0 analysis. In Studies in the structure of the American economy, ed. W. Leontief, Chapter 5. London: Oxford University Press.
29.
Isard, W.1953b. Regional commodity balances and interregional commodity flows. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 43: 167-180.
30.
Isard, W.1960. Methods of regional analysis. Cambridge, Mass. M.I.T. Press.
31.
Issermaln, A. M.1980. Estimating export activity in a regional economy: a the-oretical and empirical analysis of alternative methods. International Regional Science Review5, 2: 155-184.
32.
Jensen, R. C.1980. The concept of accuracy in regional input-output models. International Regional Science Review5, 2: 139-154.
33.
Jensen, R. C.
and Macdonald, S.1982. Technique and technology in regional input-output. Annals of Regional Science16, 2:27-45.
34.
Jensen, R. C.
and McGaurr, D.1976. Reconciliation of purchases and sales estimates in input-output tables. Urban Studies13: 59-65.
35.
Jensen, R. C.
and McGaurr, D.1977. Reconciliation techniques in I-O analysis: some comparisons and implications. Urban Studies14: 327-337.
36.
Karaska, G. J.1968. Variation of input-output coefficients for different levels of aggregation. Journal of Regional Science8, 2: 217-227.
37.
Katz, J. L.
and Burford, R. L.1982. The estimation of input-output type output multipliers when no input-output model exists: a reply. Journal of Regional Science22, 3: 383-387.
38.
Keeping, E. S.1962. Introduction to statistical inference. New York: Van Nostrand Co.
39.
Kipnis, B. A.1976. Local versus national coefficients in constructing regional in-put-output tables in small countries: a case study in Northern Israel. Journal of Regional Science16, 1: 93-99.
40.
Kokat, R. G.1966. The economic component of a regional socioeconomic model. New York: I.B.M. Technical Report, Advanced Systems Development Division.
41.
Leontief, W.1953. Studies in the structure of the American economy. London: Oxford University Press.
42.
Leontief, W.
and Strout, A.1963. Multiregional input-output analysis. In Structural interdependence and economic development, ed. T. Barna, pp. 119-149. London: Macmillan.
43.
Mayer, W.
and Pleeter, S.1975. A theoretical justification for the use of location quotients. Regional Science and Urban Economics5: 343-355.
44.
McMenamin, R. G.
and Haring, J. E.1974. An appraisal of nonsurvey techniques for estimating regional input-output models. Journal of Regional Science14, 2: 191-205.
45.
Miernyk, W.
, Bonner, E. R., Chapman, J. H., Jr., and Shellhammer, K.1967. Impact of the space program on a local economy: an input output analysis. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
46.
Miernyk, W.1968. Long range forecasting with a regional input-output model. Western Economic Journal6: 165-176.
47.
Miernyk, W.1969. Comment on Czamanski and Malizia. Papers and Proceedings, Regional Science Association23: 81-82.
48.
Miernyk, W.1976. Comments on recent developments in regional input-output analysis. International Regional Science Review1, 2: 47-55.
49.
Miernyk, W.1979. Reconciling reconciliation procedures in regional input-output analysis: comment. International Regional Science Review4, 1: 36-38.
50.
Moore, F. T.
and Petersen, J. W.1955. Regional analysis: an interindustry model of Utah. Review of Economics and Statistics37: 368-380.
51.
Morrison, W. I.
and Smith, P.1974. Nonsurvey input-output techniques at the small area level: an evaluation. Journal of Regional Science14, 1: 1-14.
52.
Moses, L. N.1958. Location and the theory of production. Quarterly Journal of Economics72: 259-272.
53.
Nevin, E. T.
, Roe, A. R. and Round, J. I.1966. The structure of the Welsh economy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
54.
Polenske, K. R.1980. The United States multiregional input-output accounts and model. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.
55.
Richardson, H. W.1972. Input-output and regional economics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
56.
Round, J. I.1972. Regional input-output models in the U.K.: a reappraisal of some techniques. Regional Studies6: 1-9.
57.
Round, J. I.1978a. An interregional input-output approach to the evaluation of nonsurvey methods. Journal of Regional Science18, 2: 179-194.
58.
Round, J. I.1978b. On estimating trade flows in interregional input-output models. Regional Science and Urban Economics8: 289-302.
59.
Round, J. I.1979. Compensating feedback effects in interregional input-output models. Journal of Regional Science19, 2: 145-155.
60.
Schaffer, W. A.1976. On the use of input-output models for regional planning. Studies in Applied Regional Science, Vol. 1. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
61.
Schaffer, W. A.
and Chu, K.1969. Nonsurvey techniques for constructing regional interindustry models. Papers and Proceedings, Regional Science Association23: 83-101.
62.
Schaffer, W. A.
and Chu, K. 1971. Simulating regional interindustry models for Western States. Paper presented at the Pacific Regional Science Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, August 26-29. Papers of the First Pacific Regional Science Conference, 1969. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
63.
Shen, T. Y.1960. An input-output table with regional weights. Papers and Proceedings, Regional Science Association6: 113-119.
64.
Smith, P.
and Morrison, W. J.1974. Simulating the urban economy. London: Pion Press.
65.
Stevens, B.
and Trainer, G. A.1980. Error generation in regional input-output analysis and its implications for non-survey models. In Economic impact analysis: methodology and applications, ed. S. Pleeter, pp. 68-84. Boston: Martin Nijhoff.
66.
Stevens, B.
, Treyz, G. I., Ehrlich, D. J., and Bower, J. R.1983. A new technique for the construction of nonsurvey regional input-output models and comparisons with two survey-based models. International Regional Science Review8, 3: 271-286.
67.
Streit, M. B.1969. Spatial associations and economic linkages between industries. Journal of Regional Science9, 2: 177-188.
68.
Thumann, R. G.1978. A comment on "Evaluating the possibilities for exchanging regional input-output coefficients."Environment and Planning A, 10: 321-325.
69.
Tilanus, C. B.1966. Input-output experiments, The Netherlands—1948-1961. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
70.
Uribe, B.
, Theil, H., and De Leeuw, C. G.1966. Information approach to the prediction of interregional trade flows. Review of Economic Studies33: 209-220.
71.
Van der Ploeg, F.1982. Reliability and the adjustment of sequences of large accounting matrices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A145, Part 2: 169-194.
72.
Vanwynsberghe, D.1976. An operational nonsurvey technique for estimating a coherent set of interregional input-output tables. In Advances in input-output analysis, ed. K. Polenske and J. V. Skolka, pp. 279-294. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
73.
West, G. R.
and Jensen, R. C.1980. The effect of relative coefficient size on input-output multipliers. Environment and Planning A, 12: 659-670.
74.
Wilson, A. G.1970. Entropy in urban and regional modelling. London: Pion Press.