The Role of a Teacher Professional Development Software in IEP Quality and Student Learning

Abstract

High-quality Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) statements and measurable annual goals are foundational to effective Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) for students with disabilities, yet many special education teachers report difficulty writing these components. Targeted professional development may strengthen IEP quality, but limited research has examined how technology-based professional development influences alignment among IEP components and subsequent student outcomes. This correlational study examined the relationships among PLAAFP quality, IEP goal quality, teacher characteristics, professional development software use, and student academic growth following participation in Goalbook Toolkit, a digital professional development platform. Participants included 135 special education teachers and 160 students in Grades 2–8 randomly selected across 22 school districts in a Midwestern state. Archival 2023–2024 IEP documents were scored using validated rubrics to assess PLAAFP and goal quality, and student growth in reading and mathematics was calculated using fall-to-spring assessment data. Results indicated a strong positive relationship between PLAAFP quality and IEP goal quality (r = .63, p < .001), with PLAAFP quality accounting for 40% of the variance in goal quality. However, relationships between IEP goal quality and student growth in reading and mathematics were weak and non-significant. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that teacher characteristics significantly predicted combined student growth, while Goalbook Toolkit usage contributed modest incremental variance. Findings highlight the critical role of high-quality PLAAFP statements in strengthening IEP goal quality and suggest that improving written IEP components alone may be insufficient to produce short-term gains in student achievement. Implications for sustained, technology-supported special education teacher professional development are discussed.

Keywords

literacy content/curriculum area math inservice teachers professional development online/web-based instruction technology perspectives

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bateman

B. D.

Herr

C. M.

(2019). Writing measurable IEP goals and objectives (3rd ed.). Attainment Company.

Blasko

Morin

Lindström

Murphy

Squitieri

(2024). Special educators’ training and preparedness to write individualized education programs. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 47(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064241234616

Boavida

Aguiar

McWilliam

Pimentel

(2010). Quality of individualized education program goals of preschoolers with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 23(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0b013e3181e45925

Burns

M. K.

Lembke

E. S.

Duesenberg‐Marshall

M. D.

Hopkins

Hirt

Romero

M. E.

Thomas

Steinbauer

J. A.

Del Gaiso

Crooks

(2023). The relationship between quality of the present level of academic achievement and functional performance statement and student learning. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 23(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12606

Christle

Yell

(2010). Individualized education programs: Legal requirements and research findings. Exceptionality, 18(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2010.491740

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

(2018). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Coleman

O. F.

Aiono-Conradi

Walker

V. L.

Huntington

R. N.

Afriyie

(2025). An analysis of behavior goals in Individualized Education Programs of students with extensive support needs. The Journal of Special Education, 59(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669241308847

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Datnow

Hubbard

(2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2

10.

Dunn

Rice

(2022). Study showing Goalbook Toolkit increases educator efficiency and efficacy in IEP goal writing. https://goalbookapp.com/explore-toolkit/

11.

Flannery

Lombardi

Kato

(2013). The impact of professional development on the quality of the transition components of IEPs. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413489727

12.

Goalbook . (2025). Goalbook toolkit. https://goalbookapp.com/

13.

Goldhaber

Lavery

Theobald

(2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15592622

14.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2006). Teacher quality. In Hanushek

E. A.

Welch

(Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1051–1078). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02018-6

15.

Harmon

Street

Bateman

Yell

(2020). Developing present levels of academic achievement and functional performance statements for IEPs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(5), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920914260

16.

Haynes

S. N.

Richard

D. C. S.

Kubany

E. S.

(1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238

17.

Hott

Morano

Peltier

Pulos

Peltier

(2020). Are students with mathematics learning disabilities receiving FAPE? Insights from a descriptive review of individualized education programs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(4), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12231

18.

IRIS Center . (2025). Page 6: High-quality PLAAFP statements. Vanderbilt University. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/iep01/cresource/q3/p06/

19.

Jung

L. A.

Guskey

T. R.

(2017). Goals and targets: Planning for student learning. Solution Tree Press.

20.

Keith

T. Z.

(2019). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge.

21.

Kraemer

B. R.

Tomaszewski

Rentschler

L. F.

Steinbrenner

J. R.

Hume

K. A.

McDaniel

Dawalt

Brum

Szidon

(2022). Quality of the transition component of the IEP for high school students with Autism. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 45(4), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221079743

22.

Kurth

Lockman-Turner

Burke

Ruppar

(2021). Curricular philosophies reflected in individualized education program goals for students with complex support needs. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.4.2834

23.

Kurth

Ruppar

McQueston

McCabe

Johnston

Toews

(2018). Types of supplementary aids and services for students with significant support needs. The Journal of Special Education, 52(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918791156

24.

Leko

M. M.

Brownell

M. T.

Sindelar

P. T.

Kiely

M. T.

(2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782

25.

Mandinach

E. B.

Gummer

E. S.

(2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011

26.

Mattatall

(2011). Using CBM to help Canadian elementary teachers write effective IEP goals. Exceptionality Education International, 21(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v21i1.7670

27.

Rakap

(2023). Chatting with GPT: Enhancing individualized education program goal development for novice special education teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231211295

28.

Rowland

Quinn

Steiner

(2014). Beyond legal. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740114551632

29.

Ruble

McGrew

Dalrymple

Jung

(2010). Examining the quality of IEPs for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(12), 1459–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1003-1

30.

Smith

S. J.

(2014). Using data to write present levels of academic achievement and functional performance. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(5), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451213513952

31.

Stemler

S. E.

Tsai

(2008). Best practices in interrater reliability: Three common approaches. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 13(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.7275/2z9c-7m36

32.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

33.

U.S. Department of Education . (2006). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities: Definition of individualized education program (34 C.F.R. § 300.320(a)(1)). Code of Federal Regulations. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/regs/b/d/300.320/a/1

34.

Waterfield

D. A.

Coleman

O. F.

Welker

N. P.

Kennedy

M. J.

McDonald

S. D.

Cook

B. G.

(2025). IEPs in the age of AI: Examining IEP goals written with and without ChatGPT. Journal of Special Education Technology, 41(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251324592

35.

Yell

M. L.

Katsiyannis

Ennis

R. P.

Losinski

(2020). Avoiding procedural errors in individualized education programs: Legal and practical considerations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(3), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059919883101