The viability of KM partly rests on how researchers garner empirical support for their purported theories. One aspect of this would involve the evaluation of the evidence provided in KM research. This paper presents a comparative study of the evidence that is presented in scholarly and professional literature on KM. For this purpose, the paper introduces a typology of evidence to analyze the data obtained from the survey of the literature. The classification based on this typology reveals quantitative differences between the types of evidence put forth in the scholarly and practitioner literature. More interestingly, however, our analysis reveals differences in terms of the questions they ask, the perspective they adopt, and the methods they follow to convince others of the validity of their claims. We explain these differences in terms of the notions of `blackboxing' and `performance' borrowed from actor-network theory.
J. Pfeffer and R.I. Sutton , The Knowing-DoingGap : How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action ( Harvard Business School Press, Boston , 1999).
2.
P.M. Hirsch and D.Z. Levin , Umbrella advocates versus validity police: a life-cycle model , Organization Science10(2) (1999) 199—212 .
3.
P.H. Gray and D.B. Meister , Introduction: fragmentation and integration in knowledge management research , Information Technology and People16(3) (2003) 259—65 .
4.
E. Davenport , Mundane knowledge management and microlevel organizational learning: an ethological approach , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology53(12) (2002) 1038—46 .
5.
L.J. Ponzi and M. Koenig , Knowledge management: another management fad?Information Research8(1) (2002). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/8—1/paper145.html (accessed 26 July 2004).
6.
Z. Guo and A. Sheffield , Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of KM Research: 2000—2004 (2006). Available at: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.23 (accessed 8 September 2006).
7.
R. Kling , A critical professional education about information and communication technologies and social life , Information Technology and People16(4) (2003) 394—418 .
8.
N. Van House , Science and technology studies and information studies , Annual Review of Information Science and Technology38 (2004) 1—86 .
9.
M. Curd and J.A. Cover , Philosophy of Science: the Central Issues ( Norton, New York , 1998).
10.
U. Schultze and D.E. Leidner , Studying knowledge management in information systems research: discourses and theoretical assumptions , MIS Quarterly26(3) (2002) 213—42 .
K. Popper , The Logic of Scientific Discovery ( Basic Books, New York , 1959).
13.
S. Shapin , A. SocialHistory of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England ( The University of Chicago Press, Chicago , 1994).
14.
H. Longino , Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry ( Princeton University Press, Princeton,1990).
15.
B. Latour , Science in Action ( Harvard University Press, Cambridge , 1987).
16.
H.R. Ekbia , How IT mediates organizations: Enron and California energy crisis , Journal of Digital Information5(4) (2005). Available at: http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v05/i04/Ekbia/ (accessed 20 April 2007).
17.
M. Callon , Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters, ( Routledge, London , 1992).
18.
B. Latour , Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies ( Harvard University Press, Cambridge , 1999).
19.
A. Mol , Ontological politics: a word and some questions. In: J. Law and J. Hassard (eds), Actor Network Theory and After ( Blackwell / The Sociological Review, Oxford / Malden , 1999).
20.
J. Benders and K. van Veen , What's in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions , Organization8(1) (2001) 33—53 .
21.
M. Hammer and J. Champy , Reengineering the Corporation: a Manifesto for Business Revolution ( HarperCollins, New York , 1993).
22.
E. Wenger , R. McDermott and W.M. Snyder , Cultivating Communities of Practice: a Guide to Managing Knowledge ( Harvard Business School Press, Boston , 2002).
23.
P.W. Rosen , Knowledge Management Book Bibliography (2002). Available at: www.kmadvantage.com/km_bibliography.htm (accessed 27 November 2003).
24.
T.H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge : How Organizations Manage What They Know ( Harvard Business School Press, Boston , 1998).
25.
J.S. Brown and P. Duguid , The Social Life of Information ( Harvard Business School Press, Boston , 2000).
26.
V. Allee , The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence ( Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton Abbott , 1997).
27.
A. Badre , Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context ( Addison-Wesley, Boston , 2002).
28.
W.J. Orlikowski , Learning from notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , The Information Society9(3) (1993) 237—50 .
29.
H.R. Ekbia and N. Hara , Incentive structures in knowledge management. In: D.G. Schwartz (ed.), Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management ( Idea Group, Hershey , 2005).
30.
N. Hara , P. Solomon , S. Kim and D.H. Sonnenwald , An emerging view of scientific collaboration: scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54(10) (2003) 952—65 .
31.
L. Suchman , Making a case: `knowledge' and `routine' work in document production. In: P. Luff et al. (eds), Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , 2000).
32.
H.R. Ekbia and R. Kling , Network organizations: voluntary cooperation or multivalent negotiation . The Information Society21(3) (2005) 155—68 .
33.
W.H. DeLone and E.R. McLean , Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable , Information Systems Research3(1) (1992) 60—95 .
34.
W.H. DeLone and E.R. McLean , The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update , Journal of Management Information Systems19(4) (2003) 9—30 .
35.
M.L. Markus and R.I. Benjamin , The magic bullet theory in IT-enabled transformation , Sloan Management Review38(2) (1997) 55—68 .
36.
F. Caldwell , D. Miklovic and D. Morello , Hype Cycle of KnowledgeManagement (2003). Available at: www.edocument.org.sa/Hype_Cycle.pdf (accessed 22 December 2003).
37.
N. Hara and R. Kling , Professional development and knowledge management via virtual spaces. In: J. Weiss et al. (eds), International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments ( Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht , 2006 ).
