A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the `green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
J.B. Thompson , Books in the Digital Age ( Polity Press, Cambridge, 2005).
2.
P. Suber, Timeline of the Open Access Movement (2007). Available at: www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/timeline.htm (accessed 27 November 2007).
3.
C.P. Bourne and T.B. Hahn, A History of Online Information Systems 1963-1976 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2003).
4.
D.I. RaittOnline Information Systems (Learned Information, London, 1984).
5.
C. Steele, The library's perspective on scholarly publishing in the 21st century. In: G.E. Gorman (ed.) Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era (Facet, London, 2005).
6.
J. Cox, Scholarly Publishing Practice: the ALPSP Report on Academic Publishers' Policies in Online Publishing (ALPSP, Worthing , 2003).
7.
J. Willinsky, Copyright Contradictions in Scholarly Publishing (no date). Available at: http://research2.csci.educ.ubc.ca/eprints/archive/00000006/01/index.html (accessed 21 August 2007).
8.
J. Feather, The Information Society: a Study of Continuity and Change ( Facet, London, 2004).
9.
S.S. Bergman , The scholarly communication movement: highlights and recent developments, Collection Building25(4) (2006) 108-28.
10.
T.P. Barwise , Online Searching: the Impact on User Charges of the Extended Use of Online Information Services (Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1979).
11.
J. Cox, Evolution or revolution in scholarly publishing: challenges to the publisher . In: G.E. Gorman (ed.) Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era (Facet, London, 2005).
12.
S. Morris, Mapping the journal publishing landscape: how much do we know?Learned Publishing20(4) 2007, 299-310.
13.
D.J. de Solla Price, Little Science, Big Science ( Columbia University Press, New York, 1963).
14.
B. Blunden and M. Blunden (eds), Electronic Publishing Strategies (Pira, Leatherhead, 1997 ).
15.
S. Saxby , Information access policy and crown copyright regulation in the electronic age: which way forward? International Journal of Law and Information Technology6(1) (1998) 1-33.
16.
R. Anderson , Open access in the real world: confronting economic and legal reality, C&RL News65(4) (2004). Available at: http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/351/02/SCHOLARLY%5FCOMMUNICATION.doc (accessed 16 August 2007).
17.
S. Harnad, Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving . In: J. Andrews and D. Law (eds) Digital Libraries: Policy, Planning and Practice (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2004).
18.
A. Swan and S. Brown, Authors and open access publishing, Learned Publishing17(3) (2004) 219-24.
19.
K. Antelman , Do open access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries65(5) (2005) 372-82.
20.
G. Eysenbach , Citation advantage of open access articles (2006). Available at: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157 (accessed 27 November 2007).
21.
M.J. Kurtz et al., The effect of use and access on citations , Information Processing and Management41(6) (2005) 1395-1402.
22.
S. Lawrence , Online or invisible?Nature411 (6837) (2001) 521.
23.
H.F. Moed , The effect of open access on citation impact: an analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(13) (2007) 2047-54.
24.
H. Sotudeh and A. Horri, The citation performance of open access journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(13) (2007) 2145-56.
25.
D. Stern , Open access or differential pricing for journals: the road best traveled? Online29(2) (2005) 30-36.
26.
D. Sainsbury , Open access is not the only science publishing model, The Financial Times10 November (2004) 16.
27.
S.R. Owens , Revolution or evolution? A shift to an open access model of publishing would clearly benefit science, but who should pay?EMBO Reports4(8) (2003) 741-3.
28.
J.W. Houghton , C. Steele and P.J. Sheehan, Research Communication Costs in Australia: Emerging Opportunities and Benefits (Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, 2006).
29.
I.D. Craig , A.M. Plume, M.E. McVeigh, J. Pringle and M. Amin, Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature, Journal of Informetrics1(3) ( 2006) 239-48.
30.
A. Swan and S. Brown, Open Access Self-Archiving: an Author Study (Key Perspectives Ltd, Truro, 2005).
31.
M. Bates , S. Loddington, S. Manuel and C. Oppenheim, Attitudes to the rights and rewards for author contributions to repositories for teaching and learning, ALT-J Research in Learning Technology15(1) (2007) 67-82.
32.
E. Gadd, S. Loddington and C. Oppenheim, A comparison of academics' attitudes towards the rights protection of their research and teaching materials, Journal of Information Science33(6) ( 2007) 686-701.
33.
P. Suber, SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Available at: www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/06-02-07.htm (accessed 21 August 2007].
34.
S.R. Urs , Copyright, academic research and libraries: balancing the rights of stakeholders in the digital age, Electronic Library and Information Systems38(3) (2004) 201-207.
35.
A. Muir, Digital preservation: awareness, responsibilities and rights issues, Journal of Information Science30(1) (2004) 73-92.
36.
T. Gillespie , Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2007).
37.
C. May, Digital Rights Management: the Problem of Expanding Ownership Rights (Chandos, Oxford, 2007 ).
38.
N. Lucchi, Digital Media and Intellectual Property (Springer, Heidelberg, 2006).
39.
D. Penny and R. Cliffe, DRM: still a balancing act? (Electronic Publishing Services Ltd., London, 2006).
40.
Kaufmann-Wills Group, The Facts about Open Access: a Study of the Financial and Non-Financial Effects of Alternative Business Models on Scholarly Journals/Researchers ( ALPSP, Worthing, 2005).
41.
Oxford Journals, Assessing the Impact of Open Access (2006) www.oxfordjournals.org/news/oa_report.pdf (accessed 10 March 2008].
42.
N. Jacob (ed.) Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects (Chandos , Oxford, 2006).
43.
R. Jones, T. Andrew and J. MacColl, The Institutional Repository (Chandos, Oxford, 2006).
44.
Public Library of Science. Available at: www.plos.org/ (accessed 3 January 2008).
45.
P. Peters, Going all the way: how Hindawi became an open access publisher, Learned Publishing20(3) (2007) 191-5.
46.
C. Oppenheim and D. Smithson, What is the hybrid library? Journal of Information Science25(2) (1999) 97-112.
47.
G.E. Gorman and F. Rowland (eds), Scholarly publishing in an Electronic Era (Facet, London, 2005).
48.
S.H. Chang , Institutional repositories: the library's new role, OCLC Systems and Services19(3) (2003) 77-9.
