Drawing on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, this article explores the relation between practice and activity; between recruitment practice and the ordinary activities of the job interview. Job interviews are recognizably and accountably different from other interview-formats, such as broadcast news or academic research interviews. Such differences are instantly hearable because ordinary activities are built systematically so as to reveal an orientation to ‘practice’, distinctive purposes, entitlements, presuppositions, identities and definitions of acceptable conduct. The article illustrates analytic procedures for recovering such orientations and thus for understanding how people embed and reveal practice, with and for one another, in interaction. It is argued that the practice-turn should not overlook the fact that practice is, in the first instance, a members’ phenomenon, something that members draw upon, monitor and orient to in real time interaction.
Alby, Francesca and Cristina Zucchermaglio2006‘"Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let’s fix it": How situated work practices shape group decision making’. Organization Studies27/7: 943-966.
2.
Berard, Tim R.2005‘Rethinking practices and structures’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences35/2: 196-230.
3.
Boczkowski, Pablo J., and Wanda J. Orlikowski2004‘Organizational discourse and new media: A practice perspective’ in Organizational discourse. D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds), 359-378. London: Sage.
4.
Bourdieu, Pierre1990Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5.
Button, Graham.1992‘Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews’ in Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), 212-231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Chia, Robert, and Brad MacKay2007‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice’. Human Relations60/1: 217-242.
7.
Contu, Alessia, and Hugh Willmott2006‘Studying practice: Situating talking about machines’ . Organization Studies27/1: 1769-1782.
8.
De Certeau, M.1984The practice of everyday life. Berkeley : University of California Press.
9.
Drew, Paul1992‘Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape’ in Talk at work.P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), 418-469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Fox, Steve2008‘That miracle of familiar organizational things: Social and moral order in the MBA classroom’. Organization Studies29/5: 733-762.
11.
Gardner, Rod.2002When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance . New York: John Benjamins.
12.
Garfinkel, Harold1967Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge : Polity.
13.
Garfinkel, Harold2002Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
14.
Giddens, Anthony1984The constitution of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Gherardi, Silvia, and Davide Nicolini2002‘Learning the trade: A culture of safety in practice’. Organization9/2: 191-223.
16.
Goffman, Erving1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
17.
Heritage, John1984‘A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement’ in Structures of social action. J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), 299-345. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
18.
Hindmarsh, Jon, and Alison Pilnick2007‘Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia’. Organization Studies28/9: 1395-1416.
19.
Hindmarsh, Jon, and Nick Llewellyn2009‘Methodological orientations’ in Organization, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. N. Llewellyn and J. Hindmarsh (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Jarzabkowski, Paula2004‘Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation and practices in use’. Organization Studies25/4: 529-560.
21.
Jarzabkowski, Paula, and David Seidl2008‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’ . Organization Studies29/1: 1391-1426.
22.
Llewellyn, Nick2008‘Organization in actual episodes of work: Harvey Sacks and organization studies’. Organization Studies29/5: 763-791.
23.
Lynch, Michael1993Scientific practice and ordinary action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Rawls, Anne2008‘Harold Garfinkel, ethnomethodology and workplace studies’. Organization Studies29/5: 701-732.
25.
Sacks, Harvey1984‘Notes on methodology’ in Structures of Social Action. J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), 21-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Sacks, Harvey1992Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
27.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson1974‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language50: 696-735.
28.
Schatzki, Theodore R.1997‘Practices and actions: A Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences27/3: 283-308.
29.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.1992‘Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation’. American Journal of Sociology97/5: 1295-1345.
30.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.1997‘Whose text? Whose context?’Discourse and Society8/2: 165-187.
31.
Weber, Max1978Economy and society, 2 vols. Los Angeles : University of California Press.
32.
Weick, Karl1993‘The collapse of sense making in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster’. Administrative Science Quarterly38: 628-652.
33.
Whalen, Marilyn R., and Don H. Zimmerman1987‘Sequential and institutional context in calls for help’. Social Psychology Quarterly50: 172-185.
34.
Whittington, Richard2006‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’ . Organization Studies27/5: 613-634.
