This paper extends the dynamic capability view and research on organizational path dependence by arguing that path dependence can be a property of capabilities when a contingently-triggered capability path is subject to self-reinforcement (i.e. a set of positive and negative mechanisms that increases the attractiveness of a path relative to others). The paper introduces an evolutionary perspective, which specifies the underlying selection mechanisms of the property of path dependence in internal and external firm environments. This theorization sheds new light on three paradoxes that currently blur the theoretical contribution of path dependence to research at the managerial, organizational, and industry levels: (1) the problematic coexistence of path irreversibility and managerial intentionality; (2) the ambivalent strategic value of lock-in with regard to competitive advantage; and (3) the relative homogeneity in observed dynamic capabilities, despite their (possible) path dependence that should lead to a wider variety of outcomes owing to the presence of contingency. We highlight the contributions of this perspective to strategic management research and evolutionary theories.
Altman, Morris ( 2000). A behavorial model of path dependency: The economics of profitable inefficiency and market failure. Journal of Socio-Economics, 29, 127-145.
2.
Arthur, Brian W. ( 1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 116-131.
3.
Arthur, Brian W. ( 1990). Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, 262, 92-99.
4.
Balmann, Alfons, Odening, Martin, Weikard, Hans-Peter, & Brandes, Wilhelm (1996). Path dependence without increasing returns to scale and network externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 29, 159-172.
5.
Barnett, William P. ( 1997). The dynamics of competitive intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 128-160.
6.
Barnett, William P., & McKendrick, Dave (2004). Why are some organizations more competitive than others? Evidence from a changing global market. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 535-571.
7.
Bowman, Cliff, & Ambrosini, Veronique (2003). How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy . British Journal of Management, 14, 289-303.
8.
Campbell, Donald T. ( 1994). How individual and face-to-face group selection undermine firm selection in organizational evolution. In J. A. C. Baum & J. Singh (Eds.). Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Chapman, S.J. ( 1908). Laws of increasing and decreasing returns in production and consumption. Economic Journal, 18, 52-59.
10.
Collis, David J. ( 1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143-152.
11.
Cornes, Richard, & Sandler, Todd ( 1996). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Danneels, Erwin ( 2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competencies . Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1095-1121.
13.
David, Paul A. ( 1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review Proceedings, 75, 332-337.
14.
David, Paul A. ( 1994). Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions . Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5, 205-220.
15.
David, Paul A. ( 2001). Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘historical economics’. In P. Garrouste & S. Ioannides (Eds.), Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas: Past and present. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
16.
De Rond, Mark, & Thiétart, Raymond-Alain (2007). Choice, chance and inevitability in strategy. Strategic Management Journal , 28, 535-551.
17.
Djelic, Marie-Laure, & Quack, Sigrid ( 2007). Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems . Theory and Society, 36, 161-186.
18.
Dosi, Giovanni, Nelson, Richard R., & Winter, Sidney G. (Eds.). (2000). The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities . New York: Oxford University Press .
Durand, Rodolphe, & Vaara, Eero (2009). Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage . Strategic Management Journal, 12, 1245-1264.
22.
Durand, Rodolphe, & Vergne, Jean-Philippe (2010). L’Organisation Pirate : Essai sur l’évolution du capitalisme. Paris : Le Bord de L’eau.
23.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., & Martin, Jeffrey A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
24.
Garud, Raghum, & Karnøe, Peter (2001). Path dependence and creation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum . Goldstone, Jack A. (1998). Initial conditions, general laws, path dependence, and explanation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 829-845.
25.
Helfat, Constance E., Finkelstein, Sydney, Mitchell, Will, Peteraf, Margaret, Singh, Harbir, Teece, David J., & Winter, Sidney G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford : Blackwell.
26.
Helfat, Constance E., & Peteraf, Margaret A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal , 24, 997-1010.
27.
Henderson, Rebecca M., & Clark, Kim B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
28.
Henderson, Andrew D., & Stern, Ithai ( 2004). Selection-based learning: The coevolution of internal and external selection in high-velocity environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 39-75.
29.
Huygens, Marc, Baden-Fuller, Charles, Van Den Bosch Frans A.J., & Volberda, Henk W. (2001). Co-evolution of firm capabilities and industry competition: Investigating the music industry, 1877-1997 . Organization Studies, 22, 971-1011.
30.
Karim, Samina, & Mitchell, Will (2000). Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978-1995. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1061-1081.
31.
Katz, Michael, & Shapiro, Carl ( 1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility . American Economic Review, 75, 424-440.
32.
Koch, Jochen ( 2008). Strategic paths and media management - a path dependency analysis of the German newspaper branch of high quality journalism . Schmalenbach Business Review, 60, 50-73.
33.
Lamberg, Juha-Antti, & Tikkanen, Henrikki (2006). Changing sources of competitive advantage: Cognition and path dependence in the Finnish retail industry 1945-1995 . Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 811-846.
34.
Leonard-Barton, Dorothy ( 1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-126.
35.
Li, Stan X., & Rowley, Timothy J. (2002). Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1104-1119.
36.
Liebowitz, Stan J., & Margolis, Stephen E. (1990). The fable of the keys . Journal of Law & Economics, 33, 1-27.
37.
Liebowitz, Stan J., & Margolis, Stephen E. (1994). Network externalities: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 133-150.
38.
Liebowitz, Stan J., & Margolis, Stephen E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization , 11, 205-226.
Lumpkin, G.T., & Lichstenstein, Benyamin B. (2005, July). The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 451-472.
41.
Martin, Ron, & Sunley, Peter ( 2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution . Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 395-437.
42.
Moorman, Christine, & Miner, Anne S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23, 698-723.
43.
Nelson, Richard R., & Winter, Sidney G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Newbert, Scott L. ( 2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 121-146.
45.
Newbert, Scott L. ( 2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 745-768.
46.
Noda, Tomo, & Collis, David J. (2001). The evolution of intraindustry firm heterogeneity: Insights from a process study. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 897-925.
Page, Scott E. ( 2006). Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87-115.
49.
Papandreou, Andreas A. ( 1994). Externality and institutions. Oxford : Clarendon.
50.
Pierson, Paul ( 2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 92, 251-267.
51.
Powell, Thomas C.( 2001). Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations . Strategic Management Journal, 22, 875-888.
52.
Priem, Richard L., & Butler, John E. (2001). Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
53.
Reinstaller, Andreas, & Hölzl, Werner (2009). Big causes and small events: QWERTY and the mechanization of office work. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 999-1031.
54.
Repenning, Nelson P., & Sterman, John D. (2002). Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement . Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 265-295.
55.
Schreyögg, Georg, & Kliesch-Eberl, Martina (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 913-933.
56.
Schwartz, Herman ( 2004). Down the wrong path: Path dependence, increasing returns, and historical institutionalism. Mimeo. Department of Politics, University of Virginia.
57.
Sober, Elliott ( 1984). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Cambrige MA, Bradford Books .
58.
Sydow, Jörg, Schreyögg, Georg, & Koch, Jochen ( 2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box . Academy of Management Review, 34, 689-709.
59.
Teece, David J. ( 2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
60.
Teece, David J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. ( 1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management . Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-535.
61.
Tripsas, Mary, & Gavetti, Giovanni (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147-1161.
62.
Vergne, Jean-Philippe, & Durand, Rodolphe (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies , 47, 736-759.
63.
Winter, Sidney G. ( 2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning . Strategic Management Journal, 21, 981-996.
Young, Allyn A. ( 1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. The Economic Journal, 38, 527-542.
66.
Zahra, Shaker A., Sapienza, Harry J., & Davidsson, Per (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 917-955.
67.
Zollo, Maurizio, & Winter, Sidney G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science , 13, 339-351.
68.
Zott, Christoph ( 2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 97-125.
69.
Zukowski, Ryszard ( 2004). Historical path dependence, institutional persistence, and transition to market economy: The case of Poland. International Journal of Social Economics, 31, 955-973.
