The Hungarian Voter: Left–Right Dimension as a Clue to Policy Preferences

Abstract

The left–right (L–R) ideological dimension has been regarded as a useful cognitive device for orientation in the political realm. Thanks to its absorptive nature it is able to represent a party’s stands on various issues simultaneously. This article specifies a number of conditions that its use ought to satisfy in order to function as a “rational” clue for parties’ positions on issues. The perceived position of parties on the L–R dimension should correspond to the parties’ actual issue positions, and the public should be aware of which policies are represented by particular positions on the L–R dimension. The present article addresses this problem, and provides an empirical test on the basis of survey data on political preferences of a random sample of Hungarian voters (N = 1453) and of members of the Hungarian national Parliament. The evidence generally supports the plausibility of the examined model, and shows that members of the Hungarian public are reasonably successful in matching their and their representatives’ issue preferences via the familiar left–right ideological code.

Keywords

Cognitive shortcut Hungary Left–right ideology Policy preferences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen, C.H. (1978). “Measuring Representation,” American Journal of Political Science 22: 475–510 .

Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .

Berelson, B. , Lazarsfeld, P. and McPhee, W. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .

Campbell, A. , Converse, P.E. , Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley .

Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P. (1993). “The Not So Simple Act of Voting,” in A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: APSA .

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row .

Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .

Fuchs, D. and Klingemann, H.D. (1990). “The Left-Right Scheme: Theoretical Framework,” in M.K. Jennings and J. van Deth et al. (eds), Continuities in Political Actions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter .

Knutsen, O. (1995). “Value Orientations, Political Conflicts and Left-Right Identification: A Comparative Study,” European Journal of Political Research 28: 63–93 .

10.

Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press .

11.

Listhaug, O. , Macdonald, S.E. and Rabinovitz, G. (1994). “Ideology and Party Support in Comparative Perspective,” European Journal of Political Research 25: 111–149 .

12.

Markowski, R. (1997). “Political Parties and Ideological Spaces in East Central Europe,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30(3): 221–254 .

13.

Middendorp, C.P. (1989). “Models for Predicting the Dutch Vote Along the Left-Right and the Libertarianism-Authoritarianism Dimensions,” International Political Science Review 10: 279–308 .

14.

Pappi, F.U. (1996). “Political Behavior: Reasoning Voters and Multi-party Systems,” in R.E. Goodin and H.D. Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

15.

Sidanius, J. (1985). “Cognitive Functioning and Sociopolitical Ideology Revisited,” Political Psychology 6: 637–661 .