Pork barrel politics is a particular type of constituency service through which a legislator's geographic constituency benefits from the distribution of public works projects. The desire for reelection prompts a representative to use his influence to initiate local projects. A comparative model is presented, causally linking a country's electoral system with the de gree of pork barrel activity. Most literature has focused disproportionately on the United States. This model suggests that the electoral accountability linkage is strongest in coun tries with single-member districts and weakest in those with at-large districts. The article's central argument is that a strong correlation exists between the number of representatives per district and the degree of pork barrel politics. Factors such as committee structure and party discipline are also considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aberbach, J.D., R.D. Putnam, and B.A. Rockman (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press .
2.
Allum. P.A. (1973) Italy—Republic Without Government? New York: W. W. Norton.
3.
Barry, B. (1965) Political Argument. New York : The Humanities Press.
4.
Bates, R.H. (1981) Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
5.
Buchanan, J. and G. Tullock (1962) The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
6.
Butler, D., H.R. Penniman, and A. Ramney (1981) Democracy at the Polls. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
7.
Cain, B., J. Ferejohn, and M. Fiorina (1979) "The house is not a home: British MPs in their constituencies." Legislative Studies Q.4: 501-523.
8.
———( 1983) "The constituency component: a comparison of service in Great Britain and the United States." Comparative Pol. Studies16: 67-91.
9.
———( 1984) "The constituency service basis of the personal vote for U. S. representatives and British Members of Parliament." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.78: 110-125.
10.
Clarke, H. (1979) "Determinants of provincial service behavior." Legislative Studies Q.4: 601-624.
11.
Cayrol, R., J.L. Parodi, and C. Ysmal (1976) "French deputies and the political system." Legislative Studies Q. I: 67-99.
12.
Eldersveld, S., J. Koorman, and T. Van De Tak (1981) Elite Images of Dutch Politics. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
13.
Fenno, R. (1978) Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
Fiorina, M.P. (1977) Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment . New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press .
16.
———( 1980) "The decline of collective responsibility in American politics." Daedalus109: 24-45.
17.
Harrison, R.J. (1980) Pluralism and Corporatism. London: Allen & Unwin.
18.
Hoffman, S.A. (1980) "Candidate selection in Israel's parliament: the realities of change." TheMiddle East J.34: 285-301.
19.
Jewell, M.E. (1969) Metropolitan Representation: State Legislative Districting in Urban Counties. New York: National Municipal League.
20.
———and G. Loewenberg (1979) "Editors' introduction: toward a new model of legislative representation." Legislative Studies Q.4: 485-498.
21.
Johannes, J.R. and J.C. McAdams (1981) "The congressional incumbency effect: is it casework, policy compatibility, or something else?" Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.25: 512-542.
22.
Kuklinski, J. (1979) "Representative-constituency linkages: a review article." Legislative Studies Q.4: 121-140.
23.
Loewenberg, G. and C.L. Kim (1978) "Comparing the representativeness of Parliaments ." Legislative Studies Q.3: 27-49.
24.
Loewenberg, G. and S.C. Patterson (1979) Comparing Legislatures. Boston : Little, Brown.
25.
Lowi, T. (1964) "American business, public policy, case studies and political theory." World Politics4: 677-715.
26.
Maheshiwari, S. (1976) "Constituency linkages of national legislators in India." Legislative Studies Q.1: 331-350.
27.
McAdams, J.C. and J.R. Johannes (1984) "The voter in the 1982 House elections." Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.28: 778-781.
28.
Mayhew, D. (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
29.
Milnor, A.J. (1969) Elections and Political Stability. Boston: Little, Brown.
30.
Monroe, R. (1977) "The Member of Parliament as representative: the view from the constituency." Pol. Studies25: 577-587.
31.
Murphy, J. (1974) "Political parties and the pork barrel." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.68: 169-186.
32.
Pennock, J.R. (1970) "The pork barrel and majority rule." J. of Politics32: 709-716.
33.
Pierce, R. and P. Converse (1981) "Candidate visibility in France and the United States." Legislative Studies Q.6: 339-371.
34.
Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
35.
Shepsle, K. and B. Weingast (1981) "Political preferences for the pork barrel." Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.25: 96-111.
36.
Stockwin, J.A.A. (1982) Japan: Divided Politics in a Growth Economy (2nd ed.). London: W. W. Norton.
37.
———( 1983) "Japan," in V. Bogdanor and D. Butler (eds.) Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences . New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
38.
Weingast, B., K. Shepsle, and C. Johnsen (1981) "The political economy of benefits and costs." J. of Political Economy89: 642-664.
