Union Quality Comparisons Between Long-Term Heterosexual Cohabitation and Legal Marriage

Abstract

A longitudinal analysis is conducted on the union quality of long-term cohabiting and legally married couples using data from both waves of the National Survey of Families and Households. An analysis of racially homogamous (Anglo-American and African American) couples indicates that the cohabitors and marrieds do not differ significantly with regard to their frequency of conflict, perceptions of equity, and relationship satisfaction, although age, educational attainment, and educational homogamy affect differentially the cohabitors' and marrieds' perceptions of equity with time, and the cohabitors' satisfaction in particular is negatively affected by the number of children biologically related to both partners. Cohabiting couples initially spend more time alone together than do married couples but with time come to resemble the marrieds. The union quality of cohabiting and married couples is affected in the same way by union duration and prior residential union experience.

Keywords

cohabitation marriage relationship quality unions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Booth, A. , & Edwards, J. N. (1992). Starting over: Why remarriages are more unstable. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 179-194.

Booth, A. , & Johnson, D. R. (1988). Premarital cohabitation and marital success. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 255-272.

Brown, S. L. , & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668-678.

Bumpass, L. L. & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-43.

Bumpass, L. L. , & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 26, 615-625.

Bumpass, L. L. , Sweet, J. A. ,& Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927.

Cherlin, A. J. (1992). Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage, revised and enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cuber, J. F. , & Harroff, P. B. (1965). The significant Americans: A study of sexual behavior among the affluent. New York: Appleton-Century.

Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriage and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53-76.

10.

Popenoe, D. , & Whitehead, B. D. (2002). Should we live together? What young adults need to know about cohabitation before marriage. Retrieved February 26, 2003, from http://marriage.rutgers.edu/SWLT2%20TEXT.htm

11.

Scanzoni, J. (1995). Contemporary families and relationships: Reinventing responsibility. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Sprecher, S. , Felmlee, D. , Orbuch, T. L. ,& Willetts, M. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti , H. Reis , & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationship behavior(pp. 257-284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Sprecher, S. ,& Schwartz, P. (1994). Equity and balance in the exchange of contributions in close relationships. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond(pp. 11-41). New York: Plenum.

14.

Sweet, J. A. , Bumpass, L. L. ,& Call, V. (1988). The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology.

15.

Thomson, E. ,& Colella, U. (1992). Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 259-267.

16.

Tzeng, M. S. (1992). The effects of socioeconomic heterogamy and changes on marital dissolution for first marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 609-619.

17.

Vera, H. , Berardo, D. H. ,& Berardo, F. M. (1985). Age heterogamy in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 553-566.

18.

Voydanoff, P. , & Hansen, D. (1995, Spring). Data sources for family scholars, Wave 2: National Survey of Families and Households. Family Forum, p. 3-3.

19.

Waite, L. J. , & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.

20.

Waite, L. J. ,& Lillard, L. A. (1991). Children and marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 930-953.

21.

Willetts, M. C. (2003). An exploratory investigation of heterosexual licensed domestic partners. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 939-952.

22.

Winship, C. , & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 23, 230-258.