Cyclical increase in economic uncertainty and structural economic uncertainty seems to decrease fertility. This study analyzing the event history of an individual uses a sequence of events to address the question: Why do some individuals postpone to have children while others do not? The economic shock of sudden increased unemployment and changed fertility trends are studied in a large scale prospective longitudinal study (n=300,000) of individuals born 1980–85 followed through linked administrative records analyzed in discrete-time hazard regression. The experience of economic uncertainty is approximated from records of unemployment records. Economic uncertainty and social exclusion increase the individual risk of induced medical abortion, family dissolution, and postponing parenthood. Postponement of fertility is closely related to the expansion of education. The economic shock of sudden increased unemployment is found to decrease fertility rates. Labor market conditions characterized by temporary employment and social exclusion are decisive when decision about starting a family.
AassveA.LappegårdT. (2009). Childcare cash benefits and fertility timing in Norway: allocations familiales et calendrier de la fécondité en Norvège. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne De Démographie, 25(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-008-9158-6
2.
AdseraA. (2004). Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions. Journal of Population Economics, 17(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-003-0166-x
3.
AlbækK.AndradeS. B. (2023). Involuntary temporary work and mental health medications: A longitudinal study in Denmark. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(11), Article e0002634. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002634
4.
AllisonP. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In LeinhardtSamuel (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (1st ed., pp. 61–98). San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BárditsA.Adamecz-VölgyiA.BisztrayM.WeberA.SzaboA. (2023). Precautionary fertility: Conceptions, births, and abortions around employment shocks. Budapest: Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
6.
BengtssonT.SaitoO. (2003). Population and economy: From hunger to modern economic growth. OUP.
7.
BergsvikJ.FauskeA.HartR. K. (2021). Can policies stall the fertility fall? A systematic review of the (quasi‐) experimental literature. Population and Development Review, 47(4), 913–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12431
8.
BernardiF.ComolliC. L. (2019). Parental separation and children’s educational attainment: Heterogeneity and rare and common educational outcomes: Elterliche Trennung und Bildungsniveau der Kinder–Heterogenität sowie seltene und häufige Bildungsfolgen. Journal of Family Research, 31(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.3224/zff.v31i1.01
9.
BerringtonA. (2004). Perpetual postponers? women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends, 117, 9–19.
10.
BlossfeldH.KlijzingE.MillsM.KurzK. (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society: The losers in a globalizing world. Routledge.
11.
BrewsterK. L.RindfussR. R. (2000). Fertility and women's employment in industrialized nations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.271
CaldwellJ. C. (2006). The Western fertility decline: Reflections from a chronological perspective. Journal of Population Research, 23(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03031817
CazzolaA.PasquiniL.AngeliA. (2016). The relationship between unemployment and fertility in Italy: A time-series analysis. Demographic Research, 34, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2016.34.1
16.
CherlinA.CumberworthE.MorganS. P.WimerC. (2013). The effects of the great recession on family structure and fertility. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650(1), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213500643
17.
ChristiansenC. C.SchmidtG.ChristoffersenM. N. (1970). Provokeret abort. SFI.
18.
ChristiansenC. C.SchmidtG.ChristoffersenM. N. (2003). Provokeret abort: Undersøgelse af baggrund og virkninger. Socialforskningsinstituttet.
19.
ChristoffersenM. N. (1990). Barselsorlov: Mænds og kvinders erhvervsmæssige baggrund for at tage orlov. København: Socialforskningsinstituttet.
20.
ChristoffersenM. N. (2002). Dissolved families - A prospective longitudinal cohort study of family strain before parental separation following schoolchildren born in Denmark 1973. In CarlingJørgen (Eds.), Scandinavian Population Studies, Nordic demography: Trends and differentials, 13, 231–250. Oslo: Unipub Forlag.
21.
ChristoffersenM. N. (2004). Familiens udvikling i det 20. århundrede: Demografiske strukturer og processer. Socialforskningsinstituttet.
22.
ChristoffersenM. N. (2015). Familiens udvikling i det 20.århundrede i demografisk belysning. In KornerupI.NæsbyT. (Eds.), Kvalitet i dagtilbud: Grundbog til dagtilbudspædagogik. (pp. 253–272). Frederikshavn: Dafolo.
23.
ChristoffersenM. N.LaustenM. (2009). Early and late motherhood: Economic, family background and social conditions (Vol. 44, pp. 79–95). Finnish Yearbook of Population Research. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.45046
24.
CohenA.DehejiaR.RomanovD. (2007). Do Financial Incentives Affect Fertility?.
25.
ComolliC. L. (2017). The fertility response to the great recession in Europe and the United States: Structural economic conditions and perceived economic uncertainty. Demographic Research, 36, 1549–1600. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2017.36.51
26.
ComolliC. L.BernardiF. (2015). The causal effect of the great recession on childlessness of white American women. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 4, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-015-0037-1
27.
CurrieJ.SchwandtH. (2014). Short-and long-term effects of unemployment on fertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(41), 14734–14739. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408975111
28.
Danmarks Statistik (1962). Ægteskaber, fødte og døde 1941-55. København: Det Statistiske Departement.
29.
Danmarks StatistikDanmarks Statistik. (1997). Befolkningens bevægelser: 1995. Vital statistics.København: Danmarks Statistik.
30.
DoepkeM. (2005). Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro-Becker model fit the facts?Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 337–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0208-z
31.
Fernandez-CrehuetJ. M.Gil-AlanaL. A.BarcoC. M. (2020). Unemployment and fertility: A long run relationship. Social Indicators Research, 152(3), 1177–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02468-8
32.
FishbackP. V.HainesM. R.KantorS. (2007). Births, deaths, and new deal relief during the great depression. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.1.1
33.
FrejkaT. (2008). Overview chapter 5: Determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in central and eastern Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 139–170. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2008.19.7
34.
GalbraithV. L.ThomasD. S. (1941). Birth rates and the interwar business cycles. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 36(216), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1941.10500587
35.
GoldsteinJ. R.KreyenfeldM. (2011). Has east Germany overtaken west Germany? Recent trends in order‐specific fertility. Population and Development Review, 37(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00430.x
36.
GoldsteinJ. R.KreyenfeldM.JasilionieneA.ÖrsalD. K. (2013). Fertility reactions to the “Great Recession” in Europe: Recent evidence from order-specific data. Demographic Research, 29, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2013.29.4
37.
GonzalezF.QuastT. (2022). The relationship between abortion rates and economic fluctuations. Economics & Human Biology, 46, 101120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101120
38.
GrayE.EvansA.ReimondosA. (2013). Childbearing desires of childless men and women: When are goals adjusted?Advances in Life Course Research, 18(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.09.003
39.
HansenP. V. (1987). Turnover and employment among youth: Causes of the paticular problems of youth employment. In PedersenPederLundReinhard (Eds.), Unemployment: Theory, Policy and Structure, (pp. 129–145). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
40.
HeatonT. B.JacobsonC. K.HollandK. (1999). Persistence and change in decisions to remain childless. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(2), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/353767
HoutM.CumberworthE. (2015). Labor markets. In Pathways: A Magazine on Poverty, Inequality, and Social Policy (pp. 10–15). The Stanford Center on Powerty and Inequality.
43.
JohansenH. C. (1985). Dansk historisk statistik, 1814-1980: Danish historical statistics, 1814-1980. Gyldendal.
44.
JonesL. E.SchoonbroodtA. (2016). Baby busts and baby booms: The fertility response to shocks in dynastic models. Review of Economic Dynamics, 22, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2016.07.001
45.
KauhanenM.NättiJ. (2015). Involuntary temporary and part-time work, job quality and well-being at work. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0617-7
46.
KearneyM. S.LevineP. B. (2022a). The causes and consequences of declining US fertility. Aspen Institute.
47.
KearneyM. S.LevineP. B. (2025). Why Is Fertility so Low in High Income Countries?Working paper No. w33989. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2025.
48.
KearneyM. S.LevineP. B.PardueL. (2022b). The puzzle of falling US birth rates since the great recession. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(1), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.1.151
49.
KirkD. (1960). The influence of business cycles on marriage and birth rates. Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 241–260). Columbia University Press.
KiserC. V.WhelptonP. K. (1953). Resume of the Indianapolis study of social and psychological factors affecting fertility. Population Studies, 7(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2172027
52.
KomarovskyM. (1971). The unemployed man and his family. New York: Octagon Books.
53.
KotowskaI.JóźwiakJ.MatysiakA.BaranowskaA. (2008). Poland: Fertility decline as a response to profound societal and labour market changes?Demographic Research, 19, 795–854. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2008.19.22
54.
KreyenfeldM.AnderssonG.PailhéA. (2012). Economic uncertainty and family dynamics in Europe: Introduction. Demographic Research, 27, 835–852. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2012.27.28
55.
KristensenF. B.KnudsenL. B. (1986). Labor, labor assistance and infant mortality 1982-83. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 148(22), 1374–1375.
56.
LeeR. (2002). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003772034943
57.
LevitasR.PantazisC.FahmyE.GordonD.Lloyd-ReichlingE.PatsiosD. (2007). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion.
58.
LiebowE. (1967). Tally's corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men. Little, Brown and Company.
59.
LindhardtM. (1949). Infant mortality in Denmark.
60.
ManualX. (1983). Indirect techniques for demographic estimation. New York: United Nations.
61.
MatthiessenP. C. (1970). Some aspects of the demographic transition in Denmark. G.E.C. Gads Forlag.
62.
MatysiakA.SobotkaT.VignoliD. (2021). The great recession and fertility in Europe: A sub-national analysis. European Journal of Population, 37(1), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09556-y
63.
McDonaldP. (2002). Sustaining fertility through public policy: The range of options. Population, 57(3), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.2307/3246634
64.
MeronM.WidmerI.ShapiroD. (2002). Unemployment leads women to postpone the birth of their first child. Population, 57(2), 301–330.
65.
MillsM.BlossfeldH. (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course: A theoretical framework 1. Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
66.
MillsM.BlossfeldH.KlijzingE. (2006). Becoming an adult in uncertain times: A 14-country comparison of the losers of globalization. In: Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 438–458). Routledge.
67.
MillsR.FreemanW.ClaraI.ElgarF.WallingB.MakL. (2007). Parent proneness to shame and the use of psychological control. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 16(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9091-4
68.
ModenaF.RondinelliC.SabatiniF. (2014). Economic insecurity and fertility intentions: The case of Italy. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(S1), S233–S255. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12044
69.
MorganS. P. (1991). Late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century childlessness. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 779–807. https://doi.org/10.1086/229820
70.
MurtinF. (2013). Long-term determinants of the demographic transition, 1870–2000. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00302
71.
National Research Council. (1987). Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality, Pregnancy, and Childbearing (Volume I). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
72.
NeelsK.De WachterD. (2010). Postponement and recuperation of Belgian fertility: How are they related to rising female educational attainment?Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 77–106.
73.
NeelsK.MarynissenL.WoodJ. (2024). Economic cycles and entry into parenthood: Is the association changing and does it affect macro-level trends? micro-level hazard and simulation models of Belgian fertility trends, 1960–2010. European Journal of Population, 40(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-024-09695-6
74.
NeelsK.TheunynckZ.WoodJ. (2013). Economic recession and first births in Europe: Recession-induced postponement and recuperation of fertility in 14 European countries between 1970 and 2005. International Journal of Public Health, 58(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0390-9
75.
PercheskiC.KimbroR. (2014). How did the great recession affect fertility. Focus, 30(2), 26–30.
76.
PercheskiC.KimbroR. T. (2017). Deciding to wait: Partnership status, economic conditions, and pregnancy during the great recession. Sociological Science, 4, 176–195. https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a8
77.
Puig-BarrachinaV.Rodríguez-SanzM.Domínguez-BerjónM. F.MartínU.LuqueM. Á.RuizM.PerezG. (2020). Decline in fertility induced by economic recession in Spain. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34(3), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.05.011
78.
RahmqvistM. (2006). The close relation between birth, abortion and employment rates in Sweden from 1980 to 2004. Social Science & Medicine, 63(5), 1262–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.046
79.
RaschV.GammeltoftT.KnudsenL. B.TobiassenC.GinzelA.KempfL. (2008). Induced abortion in Denmark: Effect of socio-economic situation and country of birth. European Journal of Public Health, 18(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckm112
80.
RasmussenN. K. (1983). Abort-et valg? Fødsler, fødselsbegrænsning og svangerskabsafbrydelse: Baggrund og årsager til udviklingen i aborttallet. FADL.
81.
RaymoJ. M.ShibataA. (2017). Unemployment, nonstandard employment, and fertility: Insights from Japan’s “Lost 20 Years”. Demography, 54(6), 2301–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0614-y
82.
RicaS. d. l.IzaA. (2005). Career planning in Spain: Do fixed-term contracts delay marriage and parenthood?Review of Economics of the Household, 3(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-004-0979-8
83.
RobertsS. C.BerglasN. F.KimportK. (2020). Complex situations: Economic insecurity, mental health, and substance use among pregnant women who consider–but do not have–abortions. PloS One, 15(1), Article e0226004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226004
84.
RoserM. (2014). The global decline of the fertility rate. Our World in Data.
85.
RostgaardT.ChristoffersenM.WeiseH. (2000). Parental leave in Denmark. In MossP.DevenF. (Eds.), Parental leave: Progress or pitfall (pp. 25–44). NIDI/GBGS publications.
RowlandD. T.MerloR. (2000). The prevalence of childlessness in Australia. People and Place, 8(2), 21–32.
88.
RydellI. (2002). Demographic patterns from the 1960s in France, Italy, Spain and Portugal. Institute for Future Studies. (2003), Vol. 24.
89.
SchallerJ.FishbackP.MarquardtK. (2020). Local economic conditions and fertility from the great depression through the great recession. AEA papers and proceedings, 110, 236–240. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201109
90.
SchmidJ. (1984). The background of recent fertility trends in the member states of the council of Europe. Council of Europe.
91.
SchmittC. (2008). Gender-specific effects of unemployment on family formation: A cross-national perspective. SOEPpapers.
92.
SchneiderD. (2015). The great recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1144–1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12212
93.
SchneiderD. (2017). The effects of the great recession on American families. Sociology Compass, 11(4), Article e12463. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12463
94.
SobotkaT., et al. (2017). Childlessness in Europe: Reconstructing long-term trends among women born in 1900–1972. In Kreyenfeld, M. & Komietzka, D. (Eds.)Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, causes, and consequences (pp. 17–53). Rostock, Germany: Springer Open.
95.
SobotkaT.MatysiakA.BrzozowskaZ. (2019). Policy responses to low fertility: How effective are they.
96.
SobotkaT.SkirbekkV.PhilipovD. (2010). Research note: Economic recession and fertility in the developed world: A literature review. Vienna Institute of Demography.
97.
SobotkaT.SkirbekkV.PhilipovD. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37(2), 267–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x
98.
Statistiske Undersøgelser (1966). Befolkningsudvikling og sundhedsforhold 1901–60 (19). København: Det Statistiske Departement.
99.
StoneL. (2020). Pro-natal policies work, but they come with a hefty price tag. Institute for family studies.
ThiedeB. C.MonnatS. M. (2016). The great recession and america’s geography of unemployment. Demographic Research, 35, 891–928. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2016.35.30
Van de KaaD. J. (2003). Second demographic transition. Encyclopedia of Population, 2, 872–875.
104.
Van de WalleF. (1986). Infant mortality and the European demographic transition. The decline of fertility in Europe. pp. 201–233.
105.
Vedel-PetersenK. (1952). Danmarks statistik. København: GEC gad.
106.
VerickS. (2009). Who is hit hardest during a financial crisis? The vulnerability of young men and women to unemployment in an economic downturn. Discussian Paper no. 4359,1–35.
107.
VignoliD.DrefahlS.De SantisG. (2012). Whose job instability affects the likelihood of becoming a parent in Italy? A tale of two partners. Demographic Research, 26, 41–62. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2012.26.2
108.
WalkerA.WalkerC. (1997). Britain divided: The growth of social exclusion in the 1980s and 1990s. (No Title).
109.
YuW.SunS. (2018). Fertility responses to individual and contextual unemployment: Differences by socioeconomic background. Demographic Research, 39, 927–962. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2018.39.35
110.
YuleG. U. (1906). On the changes in the marriage-and birth-rates in England and Wales during the past half century; with an inquiry as to their probable causes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 69(1), 88–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2339550
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
