Spontaneous Primary Pleural Mesothelioma in Fischer 344 (F344) and Other Rat Strains: A Retrospective Review

Abstract

Spontaneous primary pleural mesotheliomas in Fischer 344 (F344) or other rat strains have rarely been reported. The objectives of this retrospective study were to develop historical incidence data and better characterize the light-microscopic morphology of these naturally occurring neoplasms in a large cohort of rats of several strains. A retrospective review was performed of National Toxicology Program (NTP) studies in rats conducted between 1980 and 2019 and comprising a total of 104,029 rats (51,326 males, 52,703 females), predominantly (90%) of the F344 strain. Of the 94,062 F344 rats surveyed, there were 30 cases of primary pleural mesotheliomas (22 males, 8 females). Of the 2998 Wistar Han rats surveyed, primary pleural mesotheliomas were present in 2 male rats. No primary pleural mesotheliomas were noted in male and female rats of other strains (6669 Sprague Dawley; 300 Osborne-Mendel). All primary pleural mesotheliomas in control and treated F344 and Wistar Han rats were considered spontaneous and unrelated to treatment. Based on light-microscopic evaluation of paraffin-embedded hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, only epithelioid and biphasic histologic subtypes were observed: 18 and 12 in F344 rats, respectively, and one each in Wistar Han rats. No sarcomatoid subtype cases were noted in any strain of rat.

Keywords

mesothelioma rat pleura pericardium Fischer 344 F344 Wistar Han

Introduction

Mesotheliomas are neoplasms arising from the lining epithelium (mesothelium) of the body cavities (pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial).¹ In humans, malignant mesothelioma is a rare but devastating cancer for which the prognosis remains extremely poor.^1,2 The great majority of human mesotheliomas (up to 90%) are pleural (developing in the thoracic cavity) and the etiologic association between pleural mesothelioma and exposure to asbestos and asbestos-like fibers in people is supported by decades of research, with approximately 80% or more human pleural mesotheliomas attributed to such exposures.^1,3

–7 The predominance of pleural mesothelioma in men compared to women is at least partly attributable to men’s typically greater occupational exposure to asbestos/asbestos fibers.^5,7 However, some human mesotheliomas have no clear evidence of asbestos/asbestos-like fiber exposure or other known causative factors like radiation and their etiology remains undetermined.^3,5,6,8

In rats, intrathoracic pleural/pericardial mesotheliomas have been experimentally induced by exposure (usually via intrapleural, inhalation, or intratracheal instillation routes) to asbestos, erionite, and other naturally occurring and synthetic minerals; radionuclides; and carbon nanotubes.^{9

–22} Induction of pleural mesotheliomas in rats by orthotopic implantation of syngeneic rat mesothelioma cells (II-45 cells) is a well-described animal model for human pleural mesothelioma.^23,24

On the other hand, spontaneous mesotheliomas in any intrathoracic or extrathoracic site are uncommon in rats. Male Fischer 344 (F344) rats have a demonstrated propensity for naturally arising mesotheliomas of the tunica vaginalis (the mesothelium lining the epididymis, testis, and mesorchium).^25
–27 These spontaneous tunic vaginalis mesotheliomas can disseminate widely throughout the peritoneal cavity although spread to thoracic cavity tissues appears to be rare.^25,28 Although well-described, spontaneous tunica vaginalis mesotheliomas in male F344 rats are nevertheless uncommon, with incidences ranging from 0.2% to 5.0%.^25,29
–31

Atriocaval mesothelioma is an intrathoracic neoplasm that can arise spontaneously in rats. Rat atriocaval mesotheliomas are also thought to develop from mesothelial or mesothelial-like cells but have a well-described distinct morphology, growth pattern, and localization (right atrial wall near the vena cava junction, or at the base of the interventricular septum) that distinguishes them from mesotheliomas arising elsewhere in the thoracic cavity.^32

–36 Incidences of atriocaval mesothelioma of up to 20% have been reported in NZR/gd inbred rats,³⁵ but in other rat strains these neoplasms appear to be rare, with incidences of less than 1.0% reported in F344³² and Sprague Dawley rats.^33,36

In contrast, there is limited information about nonatriocaval pleural/pericardial mesotheliomas in rats. Such naturally occurring primary intrathoracic (pleural/pericardial) neoplasms are considered rare.^32,37,38 Single cases of spontaneous pleural/pericardial mesotheliomas have been described in detail in aging male F344/DuCrj²⁸ and Sprague Dawley (Crj: CD[SD]) rats.³⁹ One pericardial mesothelioma (in a male) was found in a review of 96 primary cardiac neoplasms in 79,971 F344 rats from National Toxicology Program (NTP) 2-year chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies.³² In a review of spontaneous mesothelioma in a cohort of aging F344/DuCrj rats (1910 males, 1910 females), only 2 pleural mesotheliomas (in a male and female) and 1 pleural/pericardial mesothelioma (in a male) were identified, with no histologic descriptions included.⁴⁰ Several individual cases of intrathoracic mesothelioma in F344 rats were characterized by immunohistochemistry by Howroyd et al,⁴¹ but did not distinguish between mesotheliomas that were primary intrathoracic versus potentially metastatic from the peritoneal cavity.

In addition, a few naturally occurring intrathoracic mesotheliomas have been cursorily listed in several general surveys of spontaneous neoplastic lesions in rats. These include mesotheliomas in the “mediastinum” of 1/98 Slc: Wistar male rats⁴² and in the “pleura” of one of approximately 300 F344/DuCrj male rats.⁴³ Two cases of spontaneous “lung or pleura” mesothelioma in a cohort of 529 male F344 rats from NTP 2-year chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies were reported by Solleveld et al (these cases predate the period of the current review).⁴⁴ These general surveys did not include histologic descriptions so it is unclear if these cases were primary intrathoracic neoplasms versus possible metastases of tunica vaginalis mesotheliomas.

All of the above indicate a paucity of information about spontaneous primary intrathoracic mesotheliomas in rats. However, more detailed characterization of these rare spontaneous neoplasms is important to assist in accurate diagnosis and to provide meaningful historical data. Furthermore, spontaneous primary intrathoracic mesotheliomas in rats may serve as a useful model to better understand nonasbestos-related pleural mesotheliomas in people. The objective of this retrospective study was to better characterize rat spontaneous primary intrathoracic (pleural) mesothelioma by describing the light-microscopic morphology and assessing historical incidences of these neoplasms from a large cohort of rats from the NTP data base.

Materials and Methods

A total of 271 NTP studies that were started and completed, through technical report publication,⁴⁵ between 1980 to 2019 were retrospectively searched for the diagnosis of “mesothelioma” in one or more intrathoracic tissue sites (lung, heart, pleura, pericardium, blood vessel, thymus, lymph node [mediastinal or bronchial], mediastinum) using the Chemical Effects in Biological Systems database search engine software.⁴⁶ All but two were 2-year (24 month) carcinogenicity studies; the remaining two were lifetime studies (30 months). Details on the surveyed rat cohort are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.

For animals identified by this search, a light-microscopic review was performed on all available glass-slide sections of all intra- and extrathoracic (systemic) tissues, which had been previously paraffin-embedded, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Intrathoracic mesotheliomas in these animals were categorized as: (1) nonatriocaval mesotheliomas which occurred within the thorax only (hereafter, “pleural mesothelioma”), (2) nonatriocaval mesotheliomas with involvement in the thorax and in one or more extrathoracic tissues (hereafter, “multicentric mesothelioma”), or (3) atriocaval mesotheliomas. Atriocaval mesothelioma and multicentric mesotheliomas were diagnosed based on established guidelines.^37,47,48

The NTP database search identified 82 cases of mesothelioma with involvement of one or more intrathoracic tissues: 41 multicentric (33 involving the tunica vaginalis), 9 atriocaval, and 32 pleural. All of these cases were in F344 rats with the exception of 2 multicentric mesotheliomas in Sprague Dawley (Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD) rats, and 1 multicentric and 2 pleural mesotheliomas in Wistar Han (CRL: WI[Han]) rats. All multicentric and atriocaval mesotheliomas were excluded from further review. The current review is based on the remaining 32 pleural mesotheliomas (Supplementary Table 2). Gross necropsy records for the pleural mesothelioma cases were also reviewed.

Results

Out of the 32 pleural mesotheliomas reviewed, 30 occurred in F344 rats, representing a 0.03% incidence in this strain (Table 1). Of the affected F344 rats, 22 (73%) were male and 8 (27%) were female. Almost all F344 cases (24) were single instances in given studies (Supplementary Table 2). Three studies had 2 cases of pleural mesothelioma each, with the neoplasms occurring sporadically in different dose groups in these studies. Overall incidences (for all F344 studies combined) were similar for control and treated F344 rats whether the sexes were compared separately or combined (Table 1). Because of their low, sporadic incidences, none of the F344 pleural mesotheliomas were considered treatment related.

Table 1.

Summary Incidence of Pleural Mesothelioma by Sex and Treatment Type in F344 and Wistar Han Rats.

Strain:		F344			Wistar Han
PM subtype:		Epithelioid	Biphasic	Combined	Epithelioid	Biphasic	Combined
Sex	Treatment	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a
Male	CON	3 (0.02)	3 (0.02)	6 (0.04)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Male	TA	10 (0.03)	6 (0.02)	16 (0.05)	1 (0.08)	1 (0.08)	2 (0.16)
Female	CON	2 (0.02)	0 (0)	2 (0.02)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Female	TA	3 (0.01)	3 (0.01)	6 (0.02)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Male	All	13 (0.03)	9 (0.02)	22 (0.05)	1 (0.06)	1 (0.06)	2 (0.12)
Female	All	5 (0.01)	3 (0.01)	8 (0.02)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
All	CON	5 (0.02)	3 (0.01)	8 (0.03)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
All	TA	13 (0.02)	9 (0.01)	22 (0.03)	1 (0.08)	1 (0.08)	2 (0.16)
All	All	18 (0.02)	12 (0.01)	30 (0.03)	1 (0.03)	1 (0.03)	2 (0.07)

Abbreviations: PM, pleural mesothelioma; CON, control; TA, test article.

^a Percentage of all rats of same strain/sex/treatment in cohort (see Supplementary Table 1).

When routes of administration were compared, overall incidences of pleura mesothelioma were higher in F344 rats subjected to whole body inhalation exposure (0.074%) compared to incidences in rats in studies with other administration routes (0.003%-0.041%), excluding the single study in which animals were given subcutaneous injections along with whole body inhalation (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary Incidence of Pleural Mesothelioma by Exposure Route in F344 and Wistar Han Rats.

Strain:	F344			Wistar Han
PM subtype:	Epithelioid	Biphasic	Combined	Epithelioid	Biphasic	Combined
Exposure route	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a	# (%)^a
Feed	1 (0.003)	0 (0)	1 (0.003)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Oral gavage	5 (0.017)	3 (0.010)	8 (0.027)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Inhalation^b	7 (0.037)	7 (0.037)	14 (0.074)	1 (0.083)	1 (0.083)	2 (0.166)
Inhalation^b + SC injection	0 (0)	1 (0.347)	1 (0.347)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Whole body^c	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Topical	2 (0.033)	0 (0)	2 (0.033)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Water	3 (0.031)	1 (0.010)	4 (0.041)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)

Abbreviations: PM, pleural mesothelioma; SC, subcutaneous.

^a Percentage of all strain/sex/treatment in cohort (see Supplementary Table 1).

^b Whole body inhalation.

^c Whole body exposure to magnetic field or radio frequency radiation.

All F344 pleural mesotheliomas were noted in animals over 1 year of age. At the time of death or euthanasia, F344 rats with pleural mesothelioma had been on test an average of 667 days (range 413-735 days; median 681 days), including 8 rats that survived until terminal euthanasia. Of the 22 affected F344 rats that died or were euthanized early, 8 cases had pleural mesothelioma listed in data records as the primary cause of death; 10 cases had another diagnosis listed as the primary cause of death and 4 had no cause of death listed (Supplementary Table 2).

Out of a total of 2998 Wistar Han rats (1599 male, 1399 female) in the NTP cohort, 2 rats with primary pleural mesothelioma were identified, representing a 0.07% incidence in this strain. Both affected Wistar Han rats were males from a single study (Supplementary Table 2). One male was in the low dose treatment group and died naturally on study day 701; pleural mesothelioma was considered the cause of death. The second affected male was in the mid dose treatment group and survived until terminal euthanasia on study day 730. No other systemic or parenchymal neoplasms or space-occupying lesions of any type were concurrently present in the lungs or other intrathoracic tissues in these 2 animals. In this study, no relationship between test article administration and pleural mesothelioma was identified. The very low overall incidences precluded assessment of any possible sex predisposition in the Wistar Han cohort.

No pleural mesotheliomas were identified among the cohorts of Sprague Dawley rats (6669 rats) or Osborne-Mendel rats (300 rats) in the studies reviewed.

Gross necropsy records were available for all rats with pleural mesothelioma. In 14/29 F344 rats and 1/2 Wistar Han rats, gross lesions were identified in the thoracic cavity at necropsy and histologically associated with pleural mesothelioma. As noted at necropsy, the pleural mesotheliomas were typically described as multiple pale white to red nodules/masses affecting the lung, pleura, mediastinum, diaphragm, or intercostal muscles. Thickening of the pericardium and clear to red fluid within the thoracic cavity were also common necropsy findings in the rats with pleura mesothelioma.

As noted by light microscopy of H&E-stained sections, pleural mesotheliomas in F344 rats were expansile growths which characteristically grew along serosal surfaces of the lung and/or mediastinum (Figure 1A; case no. 32) with occasional extension to the pericardial and epicardial surfaces. The pulmonary pleural surface was most commonly affected (26/30 cases), but mesotheliomas confined to the mediastinum did occur (Supplementary Table 2). Mesotheliomas confined solely to the pericardial/epicardial surfaces were not observed. Compression of subjacent lung by the pleural neoplastic masses was sometimes prominent (Figure 1A) but local invasion into the subpleural parenchyma occurred in only one case (Case no. 20; Supplementary Table 2). However, extensive infiltration of mediastinal or pericardial fat was sometimes present. The light-microscopic morphology of the H&E-stained pleural mesotheliomas in Wistar Han rats was similar to that of the F344 cases.

Figure 1.

Epithelioid pleural mesothelioma in a male Wistar Han rat (case no. 32). A, Neoplastic masses extend along the pulmonary pleural surface with focal downward compression of the underlying pulmonary parenchyma. B-D, Higher magnification regions of the neoplasm shown in A. B, Multifocally the neoplasm forms papillary projections supported by homogenous, pale eosinophilic (hyalinized) collagenous stroma. C, Neoplastic cells also form solid, densely cellular nodules with scant connective tissue stroma. D, Higher magnification of solid nodule in C. Trabeculae composed of cuboidal neoplastic mesothelial cells are supported by scant collagenous stroma. Hematoxylin and eosin stain.

Pleural mesotheliomas were subdivided histomorphologically into epithelioid (epitheliomatous), biphasic (mixed), or sarcomatoid types based on published diagnostic criteria for rats and mice³⁷ and similar to the classification of human pleural mesotheliomas.^2,4,49 The majority of the F344 pleural mesotheliomas were classified as epithelioid (18/30), with the remaining 12 classified as biphasic (Table 1). The Wistar Han mesotheliomas were classified as one epithelioid and one biphasic (Table 1). Sarcomatoid types were not observed.

Component cells of epithelioid tumors had distinct cell borders, scant eosinophilic cytoplasm, a high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, and round to oval nuclei with large single central nucleoli. In some cases, the constituent cells were large and more pleomorphic with polygonal to elongated outlines. In epithelioid mesotheliomas, neoplastic cells formed papilliform and/or solid patterns. While one pattern typically predominated, both patterns could be identified within the same tumor (Figure 1B-D; case no. 32). Papilliform areas were composed of single to multiple, simple or branching connective tissue projections or trabeculae covered by a single layer of flattened to cuboidal epithelial-type cells (Figure 2A and B; case no. 2). Solid areas were composed of densely cellular sheets, nodules or broad trabeculae with scant connective tissue stroma (Figure 1C-D). In some solid neoplasms, mesothelial cells formed tubules, islands, and cords within the supporting stroma.

Figure 2.

Papillary epithelioid pleural mesothelioma in a male F344 rat (case no. 2). A, Multiple frond-like projections extend from the mesothelial surface (arrowheads) of the mediastinal tissue. B, Higher magnification of A. A characteristic papilliform projection is composed of multiple branching connective tissue trabeculae covered by a single layer of flattened to cuboidal epithelial-type neoplastic mesothelial cells. Hematoxylin and eosin stain.

Biphasic mesotheliomas had papillary and/or solid epithelioid components (similar to those described for epithelioid neoplasms) but also exhibited prominent mesenchyme consisting of variable combinations of dense connective tissue and poorly differentiated spindle cells resembling sarcoma (Figure 3A and B; case no. 28).

Figure 3.

Biphasic pleural mesothelioma in a male F344 rat (case no. 28). A, This biphasic mesothelioma contains both papillary epithelioid projections (arrows) and sarcoma-like regions (asterisk). B, Higher magnification of the sarcoma-like region in A. Spindle-shaped neoplastic mesothelial cells with indistinct cell borders form streams and bundles supported by moderate amounts of collagenous stroma. Hematoxylin and eosin stain.

In all types of pleural mesothelioma, the connective tissue stroma typically had a homogenous, pale eosinophilic (hyalinized) appearance (Figure 1B). Histologic features observed in only a few of the pleural mesotheliomas included erythrophagocytosis; intracytoplasmic eosinophilic globular material of undetermined identity; and extracellular mineralized structures that were either irregularly shaped or concentrically lamellated (psammoma bodies)³⁹ (Figure 4; case no. 10). Though typically scant, aggregates of pigmented macrophages, mast cells, and lymphocytes were prominent in some cases. Mitotic figures were typically scattered through the neoplasms in low numbers, however, rare tumors contained regions of high mitotic activity. Areas of hemorrhage (both acute and chronic) and necrosis were often present but were not major features. Osseous or cartilaginous differentiation was not observed.^4,15,18,50

Figure 4.

Epithelioid mesothelioma in a male F344 rat (case no. 10). Psammoma bodies (arrowheads) are scattered within a solid tumor region. Hematoxylin and eosin stain.

Five F344 rats with pleural mesotheliomas had concurrent mononuclear cell leukemia in the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes (bronchial and/or mediastinal) (Supplementary Table 2). In these 5 cases, the leukemic mononuclear cell infiltrates were diffuse accumulations in vascular lumens and/or tissue parenchyma with no formation of large space-occupying masses. In addition, one rat with mononuclear cell leukemia had a concurrent alveolar-bronchiolar adenoma, measuring approximately 1.5 mm diameter, in one lung lobe. No other systemic or parenchymal neoplasms or large space-occupying lesions of any type were concurrently present in the lungs or other intrathoracic tissues in these 5 animals or any of the other F344 rats with pleural mesothelioma.

Discussion

Previous reports indicate that spontaneous primary mesotheliomas originating in the pleural/pericardial cavities are rare in F344 rats.^32,40,43,44 Incidences of pleural mesotheliomas in F344 rats (0.03% total; 0.05% in males and 0.02% in females) in the present study were also low and thus consistent with these previous surveys (Table 1). It is possible that some of the multicentric mesotheliomas identified but not further characterized in F344 and Wistar Han rats in the current study may have originated from primary pleural mesotheliomas, making the pleural mesothelioma incidences minimum estimates. Nevertheless, these overall incidences indicate that spontaneous primary pleural mesotheliomas are rare in F344, Wistar Han, and Sprague Dawley rats and most likely rare in Osborne Mendel rats.

Determination of test article–related effects often relies on comparison to concurrent control incidences; however in the case of rare neoplasms, such as pleural mesothelioma, historical control rates, among other factors, are useful in determining whether a positive signal is present for the test article. Of the 30 F344 pleural mesotheliomas, 8 occurred in controls and 22 in treated animals (males and females combined), representing similar combined-sex incidences of 0.03% each in control and treated F344 rats (Table 1). Control and treated cases were noted in studies with a variety of test materials. In most instances, only one pleural mesothelioma was present in a given study. In those studies with more than one (up to 2) pleural mesotheliomas, all neoplasms were in different dose groups. For all of these reasons, all pleural mesotheliomas in control and treated F344 rats in the present study were considered spontaneous and unrelated to treatment. It is notable that the only 2 cases in Wistar Han rats occurred in a single study in test article–treated males: 1/50 (2%) low dose males and 1/50 (2%) mid-dose males. Based on the NTP study report,⁵¹ these mesotheliomas were not considered related to the tested compound. The incidence of mesothelioma at any site in males in this study was 1/50, 2/50, 1/50, and 2/50 in control, low dose, mid dose, and high dose groups, respectively. The historical control rate for mesothelioma, at any site, in Wistar Han rats in NTP studies averages 1.71% (range 0%-4%).⁵² There were no incidences of intrathoracic mesothelial hyperplasia diagnosed in any group in this study. Taken together, these factors support a spontaneous nature for these pleural mesotheliomas. However, consideration should be given to distinguishing between pleural mesotheliomas and mesotheliomas arising elsewhere when evaluating incidence rates, particularly in strains such as F344 that are predisposed to tunica vaginalis mesotheliomas.

In previous reports and surveys of F344 and other rat strains, most or all of the pleural/pericardial mesotheliomas occurred in males compared to females,^{28,32,39

–43} suggesting a possible male sex predisposition for these neoplasms. Likewise, in the present study, 2.5 times as many neoplasms were noted in F344 males (22/30) compared to females (8/30) (Table 1). Although not definitive, these results support the premise that primary pleural mesotheliomas in F344 rats may also have a male sex-predisposition similar to the unequivocal F344 male predisposition for peritoneal (tunica vaginalis) mesotheliomas.^25,26 Although there were too few cases in the Wistar Han strain to evaluate possible sex predisposition, it is notable that both cases identified occurred in male rats as well. There were no clear morphologic differences in the pleural mesotheliomas among male and female rats in this cohort. In people, the predominance of pleural mesothelioma in men is partly attributable to greater occupational exposure to asbestos or similar fibers.^5,7 Such exogenous exposures cannot account for the apparent male sex predisposition in this retrospective review, suggesting endogenous, sex-related factors may play a role. Sex differences in epigenetics, metabolism, response to cellular stress, and immunity have all been postulated to play a role in cancer development.⁵³

Histologically, human mesotheliomas are classified into 3 broad categories (with many subtypes): epithelioid (epitheliomatous), sarcomatoid, or biphasic (mixed),^2,4,49 and this general histological classification is also recommended for the classification of mesothelioma in all sites in rats and mice.^25
–27,37 Using these established criteria for rat mesothelioma, all primary spontaneous pleural mesotheliomas in the present study were categorized as epithelioid (18 in F344 rats; 1 in Wistar Han) or biphasic (12 in F344; 1 in Wistar Han). No sarcomatoid cases were observed. These results are consistent with the general observation that epithelioid-type neoplasms are the most common type of spontaneous peritoneal/pleural mesotheliomas in rats.²⁷ Many reports of experimentally induced pleural mesotheliomas in rats either do not histologically subtype the neoplasms; consist of very low numbers of cases; and/or vary in whether epithelioid or sarcomatoid subtypes had the higher incidences.^{9

–15,17,18,21,40} These methodological disparities preclude plausible comparison of subtype incidences in the present series versus incidences in previous reports of induced pleural mesotheliomas.

In rats, pleural mesothelioma must be differentiated from mesothelial hyperplasia and other intrathoracic neoplasms.^27,37,54 Mesothelial hyperplasia, which is considered by many authors to have the potential to progress to mesothelioma, can precede or be concurrent with peritoneal/pleural mesotheliomas in rats.^{9,12,15,20,50,55} The light microscopic diagnostic criteria for hyperplasia include focal or papillary proliferation of mesothelial cells with little or no connective tissue stroma or extension/invasion into adjacent tissues.^27,37 Because mesothelial cells can contain hyaluronan (hyaluronic acid), stains suggestive of hyaluronan, like hyaluronidase-sensitive Alcian blue, and colloid-iron stains have been used in humans and occasionally in rats to help distinguish mesothelial proliferations from other types of neoplasms.^28,39 Invasion of the lung, diaphragm, myocardium, and other thoracic cavity tissues can occur in spontaneous and induced pleural mesotheliomas in rats.^13,14,39 In the present series, infiltration of mediastinal and pericardial fat occurred commonly to varying degrees; however, infiltration of the lung parenchyma was seen in only one case in which shallow infiltration of subpleural lung parenchyma occurred. This may be another useful feature in discerning pleural mesothelioma from bronchioloalveolar carcinomas in rats. Mediastinum-only bronchioloalveolar carcinomas rarely occur in rats but can also pose a differential diagnostic challenge, especially distinguishing them from epithelioid mesotheliomas. Howroyd et al⁴¹ found that mediastinal-only bronchioloalveolar carcinomas were negative for WT-1 (Wilm’s tumor susceptibility gene product) and positive for CCSP (club-cell secretory protein) while several pleural mesotheliomas had opposite results (WT-1 positive; CCSP negative).

A variety of factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of mesothelioma in humans and rodents, including environmental exposures, genetic mutations, inflammation, and mechanical forces. In the present survey, there were no known extraneous exposures to asbestos, other mineral fibers, radionuclides, or other known causes of pleural mesotheliomas in humans and experimental animals.^1,3,4,19,56 In humans, genetic factors, including germline mutations, may play a role in the development of pleural mesothelioma with or without exposure to asbestos or other mineral fibers.^{3,4,56

–60} Genomic alterations (deletion of CDKN2A/2B and amplification of ERBB2, a receptor-type tyrosine kinase involved in cell proliferation) have been associated with experimental iron-induced peritoneal mesotheliomas in rats.⁶¹ Thus, it is possible that sporadic genetic alterations might play a role in development of naturally occurring pleural mesotheliomas in rats. Some evidence suggests that chronic serosal inflammation may be a risk factor for development of nonasbestos-related mesothelioma in humans.^4,62 However, inflammation of intrathoracic tissues was not a prominent histologic feature in most of the rat pleural mesotheliomas in this survey, so any possible role in development of pleural mesotheliomas in these cases remains undetermined.

In the present survey, overall incidences of pleural mesothelioma (0.074%) were higher in rats subjected to inhalation exposure (whole-body) compared to incidences (0.003%-0.041%) in rats subjected to other administration routes (Table 2). It remains undetermined if this distribution was fortuitous and random or possibly related to the inhalation route. Prior studies have identified different rates of testicular adenomas and pituitary gland neoplasms between feeding study and inhalation study control F344 rats.³⁰ Stress related to individual housing, used in inhalation studies, versus group housing, used in feed studies, was postulated for this difference. Which factors, if any, related to inhalation administration (eg, increased general stress, increased inflammation or irritation of intrathoracic tissues) that may play a role in pleural mesothelioma development remains undetermined. Such data further supports assessing historical control rates by administration route when possible.

One hypothesis for the prevalence of tunica vaginalis mesotheliomas in male F344 rats is that enlargement of the testes by frequently-occurring Leydig cell tumors exert physical forces on the tunica vaginalis that stimulate mesothelial proliferation.²⁸ In the present series, five F344 rats with pleural mesothelioma had mononuclear cell leukemia, a very common spontaneous systemic neoplasm in F344 rats,^25,30 in the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes, but these infiltrates did not coalesce into space-occupying masses. One F344 rat had a small (1.5 mm diameter) concurrent alveolar-bronchiolar adenoma. Neither these 5 animals nor any of the other rats with pleural mesothelioma had other space-occupying lesions in any intrathoracic tissue. Thus, there is no evidence that any such proposed “physical forces” were a potential causative factor in the pleural mesotheliomas in this series.

In conclusion, the pathogenesis of the spontaneous primary pleural mesotheliomas in this series remains undetermined. However, the results of the present survey do indicate that naturally occurring primary pleural mesotheliomas are rare in F344, Wistar Han (CRL: WI(Han), and Sprague Dawley (Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD) rats and may also be rare in Osborne-Mendel rats. In the F344 rat subcohort in the present study, primary pleural mesotheliomas appeared to have a male sex-predisposition similar to that for peritoneal (tunica vaginalis) mesotheliomas in this strain. There were too few cases in the Wistar Han strain to evaluate possible sex predisposition. The light microscopic features of these rat pleural mesotheliomas were generally similar to those of human pleural mesothelioma and rat peritoneal/pleural mesotheliomas, so in accordance with histologic diagnostic criteria for mesothelioma in rats and humans, the pleural mesotheliomas in this survey were classified as epithelioid and biphasic; no sarcomatoid types were noted in this series. Some of the morphologic features described in this report might be useful in differentiating epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas from other intrathoracic neoplasms in rats such as metastatic carcinomas in the lung and mediastinum-specific bronchioloalveolar carcinomas. Future studies to characterize the genetic profiles, particularly for tumor suppressor genes, of spontaneous primary pleural mesotheliomas in rats may be useful in elucidating the pathogenesis of these tumors and their comparative potential for spontaneous pleural mesothelioma in humans.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material, sj-docx-1-tpx-10.1177_01926233211053631 - Spontaneous Primary Pleural Mesothelioma in Fischer 344 (F344) and Other Rat Strains: A Retrospective Review

Supplemental Material, sj-docx-1-tpx-10.1177_01926233211053631 for Spontaneous Primary Pleural Mesothelioma in Fischer 344 (F344) and Other Rat Strains: A Retrospective Review by Debra A. Tokarz, Margarita M. Gruebbel, Gabrielle A. Willson, Jerry F. Hardisty, Gail Pearse and Mark F. Cesta in Toxicologic Pathology

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-tpx-10.1177_01926233211053631 - Spontaneous Primary Pleural Mesothelioma in Fischer 344 (F344) and Other Rat Strains: A Retrospective Review

Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-tpx-10.1177_01926233211053631 for Spontaneous Primary Pleural Mesothelioma in Fischer 344 (F344) and Other Rat Strains: A Retrospective Review by Debra A. Tokarz, Margarita M. Gruebbel, Gabrielle A. Willson, Jerry F. Hardisty, Gail Pearse and Mark F. Cesta in Toxicologic Pathology

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material, sj-xlsx-1-tpx-10.1177_01926233211053631 - Spontaneous Primary Pleural Mesothelioma in Fischer 344 (F344) and Other Rat Strains: A Retrospective Review

Supplemental Material, sj-xlsx-1-tpx-10.1177_01926233211053631 for Spontaneous Primary Pleural Mesothelioma in Fischer 344 (F344) and Other Rat Strains: A Retrospective Review by Debra A. Tokarz, Margarita M. Gruebbel, Gabrielle A. Willson, Jerry F. Hardisty, Gail Pearse and Mark F. Cesta in Toxicologic Pathology

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Michelle McCrimmon, Emily Singletary, Maureen Puccini, and Dr Karen Cimon of Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc. for their excellent technical and editorial assistance.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, contract no. HHSN273201500014C.

ORCID iDs

Debra A. Tokarz

Mark F. Cesta

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Hiriart

Deepe

Wessels

. Mesothelium and malignant mesothelioma. J Dev Biol. 2019;7(2):7–26.

Nicholson

Sauter

Nowak

, et al. EURACAN/IASLC proposals for updating the histologic classification of pleural mesothelioma: towards a more multidisciplinary approach. J Thoracic Oncol. 2020;15(1):29–49.

Attanoos

Churg

Galateau-Salle

Gibbs

Roggli

. Malignant mesothelioma and its non-asbestos causes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(6):753–760.

Attanoos

Gibbs

. Pathology of malignant mesothelioma. Histopathol. 1997;30(5):403–418.

Below

Cox

Fukagawa

Hirvonen

Testa

. Factors that impact susceptibility to fiber-induced health effects. J Toxicol Environ Heatlth B. 2011;14(1-4):246–266.

Kraynie

de Ridder

Sporn

Pavlisko

Roggli

. Malignant mesothelioma not related to asbestos exposure: analytical scanning electron microscopic analysis of 83 cases and comparison with 442 asbestos-related cases. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2016;40(3):142–146.

Robinson

. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an epidemiological perspective. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1(4):491–496.

Hung

Chirieac

. Novel insights and recent discoveries on the genetics and pathogenesis of malignant mesothelioma. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(3):1314–1317.

Abdelgied

El-Gazzar

Alexander

, et al. Carcinogenic effect of potassium octatitanate (POT) fibers in the lung and pleura of male Fischer 344 rats after intrapulmonary administration. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2019;16(1):34–47.

10.

Davis

JMG

. The histopathology and ultrastructure of pleural mesotheliomas produced in the rat by injections of crocidolite asbestos. Br J Exp Path. 1979;60(6):642–652.

11.

Davis

JMG

Jones

Miller

. Experimental studies in rats on the effects of asbestos inhalation coupled with the inhalation of titanium dioxide or quartz. Int J Exp Pathol. 1991;72(5):501–525.

12.

Fraire

Greenberg

Spjut

, et al. Effect of fibrous glass on rat pleural mesothelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(2):521–527.

13.

Fraire

Greenberg

Spjut

, et al. Effect of erionite on the pleural mesothelium of the Fischer 344 rat. Chest. 1997;111(5):1375–1380.

14.

Hahn

Lundgren

. Pulmonary neoplasms in rats that inhaled cerium-144 dioxide. Toxicol Pathol. 1992;20(2):169–178.

15.

Hill

Edwards

Carthew

. Early changes in the pleural mesothelium following intrapleural inoculation of the mineral fibre erionite and the subsequent development of mesotheliomas. J Exp Path. 1990;71(1):105–118.

16.

Mast

Hesterberg

Glass

McConnell

Anderson

Bernstein

. Chronic inhalation and biopersistence of refractory ceramic fiber in rats and hamsters. Environ Health Perspec. 1994;102(suppl 5):207–209.

17.

Minardi

Maltoni

. Results of recent experimental research on the carcinogenicity of natural and modified asbestos. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;534:754–761.

18.

Numano

Higuchi

Alexander

, et al. MWCNT-7 administered to the lung by intratracheal instillation induces development of pleural mesothelioma in F344 rats. Cancer Sci. 2019;110(8):2485–2492.

19.

Saffioti

. Mesothelioma carcinogenesis: in vivo models. In: Pass

Vogelzurg

Corbone

, eds. Malignant Mesothelioma: Advances in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Translational Medicine. Springer Science + Business Media; 2005:60–86.

20.

Suzui

Futakuchi

Fukamachi

, et al. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes intratracheally instilled into the rat lung induce development of pleural malignant mesothelioma and lung tumors. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(7):924–935.

21.

Wagner

Berry

. Mesotheliomas in rats following inoculation with asbestos. Br J Cancer. 1969;23(3):567–581.

22.

Wagner

Berry

Timbrell

. Mesotheliomas in rats following inoculation with asbestos and other materials. Br J Cancer. 1973;28(2):173–185.

23.

Hudson

Weir

Moon

, et al. Establishing a panel of chemo-resistant mesothelioma models for investigating chemo-resistance and identifying new treatments for mesothelioma. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6152.

24.

Weir

Hudson

Peters

Howell

. Orthotopic implantation and peripheral immune cell monitoring in the II-45 syngeneic rat mesothelioma model. J Vis Exp. 2015;104:e53019. doi:10.3791/53019

25.

Maronpot

Nyska

Foreman

Ramot

. The legacy of the F344 rat as a cancer bioassay model (a retrospective summary of three common F344 rat neoplasms). Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016;46(8):641–675.

26.

Maronpot

Zeiger

McConnell

Kolenda-Roberts

Wall

Friedman

. Induction of tunica vaginalis mesotheliomas in rats by xenobiotics. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39(6):512–537.

27.

Zimmerman

. Peritoneum, retroperitoneum, mesentery, and abdominal cavity. In: Suttie

Leininger

Bradley

, eds. Boorman’s Pathology of the Rat: Reference and Atlas. 2nd ed. Elsevier Inc; 2018:71–77.

28.

Tanigawa

Onodera

Maekawa

. Spontaneous mesotheliomas in Fischer rats—a histological and electron microscopic study. Toxicol Pathol. 1987;15(2):157–163.

29.

Coleman

Barthold

Osbaldiston

Foster

Jonas

. Pathological changes during aging in barrier-reared Fischer 344 male rats. J Gerontol. 1977;32(3):258–278.

30.

Haseman

Hailey

Morris

. Spontaneous neoplasm incidences in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F₁ mice in two-year carcinogenicity studies: a national toxicology program update. Toxicol Pathol. 1998;26(3):428–441.

31.

Mitsumori

Elwell

. Proliferative lesions in the male reproductive system of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice: incidence and classification. Environ Health Perspec. 1988;77:11–21.

32.

Alison

Elwell

Jokinen

Dittrich

Boorman

. Morphology and classification of 96 primary cardiac neoplasms in Fischer 344 rats. Vet Pathol. 1987;24(6):488–494.

33.

Chandra

Davis

Carlton

. Naturally occurring atriocaval mesotheliomas in rats. J Comp Pathol. 1993;109(4):433–437.

34.

Elmore

Aeffner

Bangari

, et al. Proceedings of the 2017 national toxicology program satellite symposium. Toxicol Pathol. 2017;45(7):799–833.

35.

Goodall

Christie

Hurley

. Primary epithelial tumour in the right atrium of the heart and inferior vena cava in NZR/gd inbred rats: pathology of 18 cases. J Pathol. 1975;116(4):239–251.

36.

Peano

Conz

Carbonatto

Goldstein

Nyska

. Atriocaval mesothelioma in a male Sprague-Dawley rat. Toxicol Pathol. 1998;26(5):695–698.

37.

Greaves

Chouinard

Ernst

, et al. Proliferative and non-proliferative lesions of the rat and mouse soft tissue, skeletal muscle and mesothelium. Toxicol Pathol. 2013;26(3 suppl):1S–26 S.

38.

Herbert

Kyanthanahalli

Pandiri

Cesta

Chen

Miller

. Lung, pleura, and mediastinum. In: Suttie

Leininger

Bradley

, eds. Boorman’s Pathology of the Rat: Reference and Atlas. 2nd ed. Elsevier Inc; 2018:437–466.

39.

Doi

Kotani

Takahashi

, et al. Malignant mesothelioma in the thoracic cavity of a rat characterized by round hyalinous stroma. J Toxicol Pathol. 2010;23(2):103–106.

40.

Shibuya

Tajima

Yamate

. Histological classification of 62 spontaneous mesotheliomas in F344 rats. Jpn J Vet Sci. 1990;52(6):1313–1317.

41.

Howroyd

Allison

Foley

Hardisty

. Apparent alveolar bronchiolar tumors arising in the mediastinum of F344 rats. Toxicol Pathol. 2009;37(3):351–358.

42.

Maekawa

Onodera

Tanigawa

, et al. Neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in aging Slc: Wistar rats. J Toxicol Sci. 1983;8(4):279–290.

43.

Maekawa

Kurokawa

Takahashi

, et al. Spontaneous tumors in F-344/DuCrj rats. Gan. 1983;74(3):365–372.

44.

Solleveld

Haseman

McConnell

. Natural history of body weight gain, survival, and neoplasia in the F344 rat. JNCI. 1984;72(4):929–940.

45.

National Toxicology Program (NTP). NTP technical reports index. Updated April 19, 2021. Accessed November 13, 2020. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/data/tr/index.html

46.

National Toxicology Program. Chemical effects in biological systems (CEBS) database. Updated August 18, 2021. Accessed January 14, 2020. https://manticore.niehs.nih.gov/cebssearch

47.

Berridge

Mowat

Nagai

, et al. Non-proliferative and proliferative lesions of the cardiovascular system of the rat and mouse. Toxicol Pathol. 2016;29(3 Suppl):1S–47S.

48.

Creasy

Bube

de Rujk

, et al. Proliferative and non-proliferative lesions of the rat and mouse male reproductive system. Toxicol Pathol. 2012;40(6 Suppl):40S–121S.

49.

Husain

Colby

Ordonez

, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma 2017 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(1):89–108.

50.

Sakamoto

Nakae

Fukumori

, et al. Induction of mesothelioma by a single intrascrotal administration of multi-wall carbon nanotube in intact male Fischer 344 rats. J Toxicol Sci. 2009;34(1):65–76.

51.

National Toxicology Program (NTP). NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 2,3-butanedione (CASRN 431-03-8) in Wistar Han [Crl: WI (Han)] rats and B6C3F1/N mice (inhalation studies). Technical Report 593. 2018. doi:10.22427/NTP-TR-593

52.

National Toxicology Program (NTP). NTP historical controls report all routes and vehicles Wistar-Han RATS. August 2016. Updated August 4, 2016. Accessed October 17, 2021. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/historical_controls/ntp2000_2016/aug-2016-hc-report-wh-rats-all-routes.pdf

53.

Rubin

Lagas

Broestl

, et al. Sex differences in cancer mechanisms. Biol Sex Differ. 2020;11(1):17. doi:10.1186/s13293-020-00291-x

54.

Renne

Brix

Harkema

, et al. Proliferative and nonproliferative lesions of the rat and mouse respiratory tract. Toxicol Pathol. 2009;37(7 Suppl):5S–73 S.

55.

Sakamoto

Nakae

Hagiwara

, et al. Serum level of expressed in renal carcinoma (ERC)/mesothelin in rats with mesothelial proliferative lesions induced by multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWCNT). J Toxicol Sci. 2010;35(2):265–270.

56.

Dogan

Baris

Dogan

, et al. Genetic predisposition to fiber carcinogenesis causes a mesothelioma epidemic in Turkey. Cancer Res. 2006;66(10):5063–5068.

57.

Vivero

Bueno

Chirieac

. Clinicopathologic and genetic characteristics of young patients with pleural diffuse malignant mesothelioma. Mod Pathol. 2018;31(1):122–131.

58.

Betti

Casolone

Ferrante

, et al. Germline mutations in DNA repair genes predispose asbestos-exposed patients to malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Letts. 2017;405:38–45.

59.

Bueno

Stawiski

Goldstein

, et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma identifies recurrent mutations, gene fusions and splicing alterations. Nature Genet. 2016;48(4):407–416.

60.

Testa

Cheung

Pei

, et al. Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to malignant mesothelioma. Nature Genet. 2011;43(10):1022–1025.

61.

Akatsuka

Yamashita

, et al. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/2B is a hallmark of iron-induced high-grade rat mesothelioma. Lab Invest. 2010;90(3):360–373.

62.

Kodama

Hoshi

Minami

, et al. Malignant mesothelioma associated with chronic empyema with elevation of serum CYFRA19: a case report. BioSci Trends. 2008;2(6):250–254.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

0.11 MB

0.02 MB