This article examines a mother's stories which might have prominently set the tone for the narratives about autism in Vietnam. The study analyses the media representation of her family life with a child on the autism spectrum with the terrified and anguished experience of coping with the severe autistic behavior of her son and triumphantly helping him to become a human (sic). The article critiques the medicalization, normalization, eugenicism, and responsibilization ideologies embedded in the media frames that autistic challenges belong to the individuals and must be fixed, through the family's efforts, without holding state institutions accountable for addressing this public health issue. The episodic frames to represent autism as a personal medical issue and family problem demotivated the urgency of advocating for a right-based social policy to accommodate individuals with autism, while the warrior-hero's narratives driven by fears might backfire when other parents cannot afford to do the same. The combination of framing analysis and critical discourse analysis with an emphasis on the cultural political economy fills the gap in global media and communication studies to contextualize how pervasively the structural factors in an authoritarian country might impact the media framing practice.
AbuzaZ. (2015). Stifling the public sphere: Media and civil society in Vietnam (Media and Civil Society in Egypt, Russia, and Vietnam, Issue.
3.
BanachM.IudiceJ.ConwayL.CouseL. J. (2010). Family support and empowerment: Post autism diagnosis support group for parents. Social Work with Groups, 33(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609510903437383
BieB.TangL. (2015). Representation of autism in leading newspapers in China: A content analysis. Health Communication, 30(9), 884–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.889063
6.
BrownlowC. (2010). Presenting the self: Negotiating a label of autism. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 35(1), 14–21.
7.
ClarkeJ. N. (2012). Representations of autism in US magazines for women in comparison to the general audience. Journal of Children and Media, 6(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2011.587143
8.
CourcyI.des RivièresC. (2017). “From cause to cure”: A qualitative study on contemporary forms of mother blaming experienced by mothers of young children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Family Social Work, 20(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2017.1292184
9.
DuongL. B.HongK. T.VinhN. D. (2008). People with disabilities in Vietnam: Findings from a social survey at Thai Binh, Quang Nam, Da Nang and Dong Nai. National Political Publishing House.
10.
EatonK.OhanJ. L.StritzkeW. G.CorriganP. W. (2016). Failing to meet the good parent ideal: Self-stigma in parents of children with mental health disorders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(10), 3109–3123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0459-9
EspositoL.PerezF. M. (2014). Neoliberalism and the commodification of mental health. Humanity & Society, 38(4), 414–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597614544958
13.
FaircloughN.JessopB.SayerA. (2002). Critical realism and semiosis. In JosephJ. & RobertsJ. (Eds.), Realism, discourse and deconstruction (pp. 2–10). Routledge.
14.
GammeltoftT. (2014). Haunting images: A cultural account of selective reproduction in Vietnam. University of California Press.
15.
GammeltoftT. (2008a). Childhood disability and parental moral responsibility in northern Vietnam: Towards ethnographies of intercorporeality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(4), 825–842(4), 825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00533.x
16.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
17.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
18.
HaV. S.WhittakerA.WhittakerM.RodgerS. (2014). Living with autism spectrum disorder in Hanoi, Vietnam. Social Science & Medicine, 120, 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.038
19.
HoltonA. E.FarrellL. C.FudgeJ. L. (2014). A threatening space?: Stigmatization and the framing of autism in the news. Communication Studies, 65(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.855642
20.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
21.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127). World Scientific.
22.
KangS. (2013). Coverage of autism spectrum disorder in the US television news: An analysis of framing. Disability & Society, 28(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.705056
23.
KimS.-H.Anne WillisL. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of Health Communication, 12(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701326051
24.
KirkhamP. (2017). ‘The line between intervention and abuse’—Autism and applied behaviour analysis. History of the Human Sciences, 30(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695117702571
25.
LaytonL. (2010). Irrational exuberance: Neoliberal subjectivity and the perversion of truth. Subjectivity, 3(3), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2010.14
26.
MachinD.MayrA. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis. Sage.
27.
MathesonD. (2005). Media discourses: Analysing media texts. McGraw-Hill Education.
28.
McCabeH. (2008). The importance of parent-to-parent support among families of children with autism in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120802489471
Nguyen, X. T. (2015). The journey to inclusion. Sense Publishers.
34.
Nguyen-Phuong-MaiM. (2015). Potential problems in crosscultural communications: Stereotypes, prejudices, and racism. Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
35.
NisbetM. C.BrossardD.KroepschA. (2003). Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(2), 36–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02251047
36.
NyeR. A. (2003). The evolution of the concept of medicalization in the late twentieth century. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 39(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.10108
37.
PetersG.-J. Y.RuiterR. A.KokG. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S8–S31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527
38.
RuiterR. A.KesselsL. T.PetersG. J. Y.KokG. (2014). Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12042
39.
ShuB. C.LungF. W. (2005). The effect of support group on the mental health and quality of life for mothers with autistic children. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00661.x
40.
SousaA. C. (2011). From refrigerator mothers to warrior-heroes: The cultural identity transformation of mothers raising children with intellectual disabilities. Symbolic Interaction, 34(2), 220–243. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2011.34.2.220
Thu HaN. T. (2011). Gender ideologies in the Vietnamese printed media. In MajstorovicD.LassenI. (Eds.), Living with patriarchy: Discursive constructions of gendered subjects across cultures. John Benjamins Publishing.
45.
van DijkT. A. (1997). The study of discourse. In van DijkT. A. (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (Vol. 1, pp. 1–34). Sage.
46.
Vu, H. T., Liu, Y., & Tran, D. V. (2019). Nationalizing a global phenomenon: A study of how the press in 45 countries and territories portrays climate change. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101942.
WaltzM. (2003). Metaphors of autism, and autism as metaphor: An exploration of representation. Second Global Conference. Inter-Disciplinary. Net.
49.
Yến-Khanh, N. (2023). Representation of autism in Vietnamese news media:a computational framing analysis. Communication Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2023.2167510
