Pre-Service Music Educators’ Perceived Reasons for Preferring Three Foreign and Distinctive Asian Pieces

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the perceived reasons of pre-service music educators (undergraduate music majors preparing to teach music) for preferring three distinctive pieces with traditional roots in East Asia. The selected pieces were foreign to research participants in the US. Pre-service music educators (N= 66) listened to a Chinese piece, a Japanese-American piece and a Korean piece. They were asked to choose one piece that they liked and one piece that they disliked and to explain why they made these preference choices. Results indicated non-significant differences for liking or disliking any of the three pieces (p> .05). Data suggested that ‘dislike’ should be interpreted as ‘least preferred’. Results showed that pre-service music educators’ perceived reasons for preference were mostly analytical, followed by affective and interest/judgmental. Metaphorical and familiarity reasons were relatively unimportant in explaining pre-service music educators’ preference choices among the three pieces.

Keywords

analytical choice dislike East Asia preference

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asai, S. M. (1997). Sansei voices in the community. In K. Lornell & A. K. Rasmussen (Eds.), Musics of multicultural America (pp. 257–285). New York: Schirmer Books.

Brittin, R. V. (1991). The effect of overtly categorizing music on preference for popular music styles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39(2), 143–151.

Brittin, R. V. (1996). Listeners’ preference for music of other cultures: Comparing response modes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(4), 328–340.

Brittin, R. V. , & Sheldon, D. A. (1995). Comparing continuous versus static measurements in music listeners’ preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(1), 36–46.

Flowers, P. J. (1980). Relationship between two measures of music preference. Contributions to Music Education, 8, 47–54.

Fung, C. V. (1992). Musicians’ preference and perception for world music. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 4, 178–190.

Fung, C. V. (1994). Undergraduate nonmusic majors’ world music preference and multicultural attitudes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42(1), 45–57.

Fung, C. V. (1996). Musicians’ and non-musicians’ preferences for world musics: Relation to musical characteristics and familiarity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(1), 60–83.

Geringer, J. M. , & Madsen, C. K. (1981). Verbal and operant discrimination – preference for tone quality and intonation. Psychology of Music, 9(1), 26–30.

10.

Greer, R. D. , Dorow, L. G. , & Randall, A. (1974). Music listening preferences of elementary school children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 284–291.

11.

Hargreaves, D. J. (1982). The development of aesthetic reactions to music. Psychology of Music, Special Issue, 51–54.

12.

Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Verbal and behavioral responses to familiar and unfamiliar music. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 6(4), 323–330.

13.

Killian, J. (1985). Operant preference for vocal balance in four-voice chorales. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 55–67.

14.

Madsen, C. K. (1998). Emotion versus tension in Haydn’s Symphony no. 104 as measured by the two-dimensional continuous response digital interface. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 546–554.

15.

Morrison, S. J. (1998). A comparison of preference responses of White and African-American students to musical versus musical/visual stimuli. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(2), 208–222.

16.

Morrison, S. J. , & Lew, J. C. (2001). The effect of culturally specific visual stimuli on music preference evaluations of primary students in Malaysia. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 149, 39–45.

17.

Morrison, S. J. , & Yeh, C. S. (1999). Preference responses and use of written descriptors among music and nonmusic majors in the United States, Hong Kong, and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(1), 5–17.

18.

Pantle, J. E. (1977). The effect of teacher approval of music on music selection and music verbal preference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Maryland. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38(7), 4010. (UMI No. AAT 7728002)

19.

Pembrook, R. G. (1997). The effect of nationality and musical experience on listeners’ preferences and observations for four types of music. Contributions to Music Education, 24(1), 71–90.

20.

Pucciani, L. F. (1982). The effect of contiguous presentation of music classics with more- and less-preferred music on college students’ listening time and opinions about music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, OH. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(3), 717. (UMI No. AAT 8216950)

21.

Shehan, P. K. (1984). The effect of instruction method on preference, achievement and attentiveness for Indonesian gamelan music. Psychology of Music, 12(1), 34–42.

22.

Sims, W. L. , & Cassidy, J. W. (1997). Verbal and operant responses of young children to vocal versus instrumental song performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 234–244.

23.

Smith, D. S. (1989). Preferences for differentiated frequency loudness levels in older adult music listening. Journal of Music Therapy, 26(1), 18–29.