Speed-dating has become a popular way to initiate relationships; however, little scholarly research has focused on these events. This research is designed to investigate positive and negative predictors of possible relationships by focusing on decisions to engage in future dates. Interpersonal attraction, homophily, and nonverbal immediacy have been linked to the predicted outcome value (POV) of relationships during initial encounters. This study investigates how these variables influence date decisions in a six minute speed-dating experience. Results indicate interpersonal attraction and nonverbal immediacy significantly predict POV but not future date decisions. Moreover, men reported higher levels of homophily and interpersonal attraction than women. Differential elements of speed-dating as an initial interaction context and the relevance of demographics are discussed.
Ah Yun, K. (2001). The impact of interaction expectancies on the relationship between attitude dissimilarity and interpersonal attraction. Communication Research Reports, 18, 166-173.
2.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
3.
Ambady, H., Bernieri, F.J., & Richeson, J.A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 32 (pp. 201-271). San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
4.
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529.
5.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 256-274.
6.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 431-441.
7.
Amsbary, J.H., Vogel, R., Hickson, M., III, Wittig, J.W., & Oakes, B. (1994). Smoking artifacts as indicators of homophily, attraction, and credibility: A replication. Communication Research Reports, 11, 161-167.
8.
Andersen, J.F., Andersen, P.A., & Jensen, A.D. (1979). The measurement of nonverbal immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 153-180.
9.
Anderson, D., & Clandos, R. (2003). Dating after divorce. Psychology Today, 36, 46-47; 50, 52-54, 56.
10.
Argyle, M. (1975). Bodily communication. New York : International Universities Press.
11.
Arindell, W.A., & Luteijn, F. (2000). Similarity between intimate partners for personality traits as related to individual levels of satisfaction with life. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 629-637.
12.
Babad, E. (2005). Guessing teachers' differential treatment of high-and-low-achievers from thin slices of their public lecturing behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 125-134.
13.
Berg, J.H., & Clark, M.S. (1986). Differences in social exchange between intimate and other relationships: Gradually evolving or quickly apparent? In V. J. Derlega & B. A. Winsted (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 101-128). New York: Springer.
14.
Berger, C.R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles and R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122-144). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
15.
Berger, C.R., & Calabrese, R.J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication . Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E.H. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 158-215). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Burgoon, J.K., & Dillman, L. (1995). Gender, immediacy, and nonverbal communication . In P. J. Kalbfleish & J. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 63-82). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
19.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Capella, J.N., & Palmer, M.T. (1990). Attitude similarity, relational history, and attraction: The mediating effects of kinesic and vocal behaviors. Communication Monographs, 57, 161-183.
21.
Chen, S., & Marr, K. (2005, May 25). Northwestern University students spurred by dating project. Daily Northwestern.
22.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Cupid.com/PreDating. (n.d.). If you have questions...we have answers. Retrieved April 10, 2005, from http://www.cupid.com/fast-dating-service.aspx .
24.
Douglas, W. (1990). Uncertainty, information-seeking, and liking during initial interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication , 54, 66-81.
25.
Duck, S. (1988). Relating to others. Chicago: Dorsey .
26.
Duck, S. (1995). Social and personal relationships. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 655-686). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
27.
Duck, S.W., & Craig, G. (1975). Effects of type of information upon interpersonal attraction. Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 157-164.
28.
Farouky, J., & Smith, A. (2003). Brief encounters. Time Europe , 161 (6), 1c.
29.
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
30.
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin , 112, 125-139.
31.
Fiore, A.T., & Donath, J.S. (2005). Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself?Paper presented at the Healthtech Institute Conference, Portland: Oregon.
32.
Firth, E.A., Conger, J.C., Kuhlenschmidt, S., & Dorcey,T. ( 1986). Social competence and social perceptivity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 85-100.
33.
Floyd, K., & Burgoon, J.K. (1999). Reacting to nonverbal expressions of liking: A test of interaction adaptation theory. Communication Monographs , 66, 219-239.
34.
Frymier, A.B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144.
35.
Grove, T.G., & Werkman, D.L. (1991). Conversations with able-bodied and visibly disabled strangers: An adversarial test of predicted outcome value and uncertainty reduction theories. Human Communication Research, 17, 507-534.
36.
Hall, J.A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hinkle, L.L. (1999). Nonverbal immediacy communication behaviors and liking in marital relationships. Communication Research Reports , 16, 81-90.
39.
Horan, S.M., Smith, N., Schoo, M., Eidsness, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). The dark side of predicted outcome value theory: How learning of an invisible illness impacts forecasted relational outcomes . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Providence: RI.
40.
Houran, J., & Lange, R. (2004). Expectations of finding a "soul mate" with online dating. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 297-308.
41.
Houser, M.L., Horan, S.M., & Furler, L.A. (2007). Predicting relational outcomes: An investigation of thin slice judgments in speed dating. Human Communication , 10, 69-81.
42.
Jensen-Campbell, L.A., Graziano, W.G., & West, S.G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427-440.
43.
Jones, J.T., Pelham, B.W., Carvallo, M., & Mirenberg, M.C. (2004). How do I love thee? Let me count the Js: Implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 665-683.
44.
Keeley-Dyreson, M., Burgoon, J.K., & Bailey, W. (1991). The effects of stress and gender on nonverbal decoding accuracy in kinesic and vocalic channels. Human Communication Research, 17, 584-605.
45.
Kelley, D.H., &Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence . New York: Wiley.
46.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York : Guilford Press.
47.
Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227-244.
48.
Lutz-Zois, C.J., Bradley, A.C., Mihalik, J.C., & Moorman-Eavers, E.R. (2006). Perceived similarity and relationship success among dating couples: An idiographic approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 865-880.
49.
Marek, C.L., Wanzer, M.B., & Knapp, J.L. (2004). An exploratory investigation of the relationship between roommates' first impressions and subsequent communication patterns . Communication Research Reports, 21, 210-220.
50.
McCroskey, J.C., Daly, J.C., Richmond, V.P., & Cox, B. (1975). The effects of communication apprehension on interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 2, 51-65.
51.
McCroskey, J.C., Hamilton, P.R., & Weiner, A.N. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1, 323-332.
52.
McCroskey, J.C., & McCain, T.A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261-266.
53.
McCroskey, L.L., McCroskey, J.C., & Richmond, V.P. (2006). Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily. Communication Quarterly, 54, 1-31.
54.
McCroskey, J.C., & Richmond, V.P. (2000). Nonverbal behavior in interpersonal relations. Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
55.
McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., & Gleason, M.E.J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
56.
Mehrabian, A. (1966). Immediacy: An indicator or attitude in linguistic communication. Journal of Personality, 34, 26-34.
57.
Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Publishing Co.
58.
Mongeau, P.A., & Carey, C.M. (1996). Who's wooing whom II: An experimental investigation of date-initiation and expectancy violation. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 195-213.
59.
Mongeau, P.A., Jacobsen, J., & Donnerstein, C. (2007). Defining dates and first date goals: Generalizing from undergraduates to single adults. Communication Research, 34, 526-547.
60.
Morr, M.C., & Mongeau, P.A. (2004). First-date expectations: The impact of sex of initiator, alcohol consumption, and relationship type. Communication Research, 31, 3-35.
61.
Mottet,T.P. (2000). The role of sexual orientation in predicting outcome value and anticipated communication behaviors. Communication Quarterly, 48, 233-240.
62.
Norton, R.W. (1978). Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research, 4, 99-112.
63.
Palmer, M.T., & Simmons, K.B. (1995). Communicating intentions through nonverbal behaviors: Conscious and nonconscious encoding of liking. Human Communication Research, 22, 128-160.
64.
Peretti, P., & Abplanalp, R. (2004). Chemistry in the college dating process: Structure and function. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 147-154.
65.
Prisbell, M., & Anderson, J. (1980). The importance of perceived homophily, level of uncertainty, feeling good, safety, and self-disclosure in interpersonal relationships . Communication Quarterly, 28, 22-33.
66.
Ray, G.B., & Floyd, K. (2006). Nonverbal expressions of liking and disliking during an initial interaction: Encoding and decoding perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 71, 45-65.
67.
Redmond, M.V., & Vrchota, D.A. (1997). The effects of varying lengths of initial interaction of attraction. Communication Reports, 10, 47-53.
68.
Richmond, V.P., McCroskey, J.C., & Johnson, A.E. (2003). Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 502-515.
69.
Rocca, K.A., & McCroskey, J.C. (1999). The interrelationship of student ratings of instructors' immediacy, verbal aggression, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Communication Education, 48, 308-316.
70.
Rogers, E.M., & Bhowmik, D.K. (1971). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 523-538.
71.
Rosenblum, G. (2007, October 23). Relationships: Hurry up and pitch some woo. Star Tribune, Minneapolis, MN . Retrieved January 21, 2008 from http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/family/11329546.html
72.
Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B.M. (1979). Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 68-103). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
73.
Seta, J.J., Martin, L., & Capehart, G. (1979). Effects of contrast and generalization on the attitude similarity-attraction relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 462-467.
74.
Sorensen, G., & Beatty, M.J. (1988). The interactive effects of touch and touch avoidance on interpersonal evaluations. Communication Research Reports , 5, 84-90.
75.
Spear, T. (2005, Feb 13). Speed-dating proves people follow their hearts, not heads: Psychologists find dating craze gives insight into attraction . The Ottawa Citizen, p. A4.
76.
Sunnafrank, M. (1984). A communication-based perspective on attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction in early acquaintance. Communication Monographs, 51, 372-380.
77.
Sunnafrank, M. (1986). Communicative influences and perceived similarity and attraction: An expansion of the interpersonal goals perspective. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50, 158-170.
78.
Sunnafrank, M. (1988). Predicted outcome value in initial conversations . Communication Research Reports, 5, 169-172.
79.
Sunnafrank, M. (1990). Predicted outcome value and uncertainty reduction theories: A test of competing perspectives. Human Communication Research, 17, 76-103.
80.
Sunnafrannk, M. (1992). On debunking the attitude similarity myth. Communication Monographs, 59, 164-170.
81.
Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, Jr., A. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational effects of get-acquainted conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 361-379.
82.
VanLear, C.A., Jr., & Trujillo, N. (1986). On becoming acquainted. A longitudinal study of social judgment processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 375-392.
83.
Wilson, G.D., Cousins, J.M., & Fink, B. (2006). The CQ as a predictor of speed-date outcomes. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 163-169.
84.
Wright, K.B. (2004). On-line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively internet-based and primarily internet-based relationships. Communication Studies, 55, 239-253.
85.
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception . In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press.
