In this study, we present the potential of the conjunction between space syntax and Q-analysis methodologies for investigating patterns of movement flows in buildings. This potential is illustrated by an implementation of the two methodologies by comparing between two shopping malls in Israel, which are characterized by distinct spatial configurations. Q-analysis was used to identify the spread of individuals’ movement paths and their conjunction into movement areas, while space syntax enabled to examine how these aspects of movement flow are affected by the malls’ spatial configuration. The results indicate that high spatial integration and intelligibility levels not only promote intensive movement in accessible and central areas (as found in previous studies) but also the spread of movement paths and their formation to integrated circulation systems. The combined implementation of space syntax and Q-analysis improves our understanding about the role of building’ spatial configuration in shaping movement flows. We discuss the potential of this implementation for monitoring and improving movement flow and usability of spaces in buildings.
ArthurPPassiniR (1992) Wayfinding: People, Signs and Architecture, New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
AtkinRH (1974) Mathematical Structure in Human Affairs, London: Heinemann.
3.
Batty M (2004) A new theory of space syntax. CASA working paper #75.
4.
BattyM (2013) The New Science of Cities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BrownGM (1999) Design and value: Spatial form and the economic failure of a mall. Journal of Real Estate Research17(2): 189–225.
6.
ChangD (2002) Spatial choice and preference in multilevel movement networks. Environment and Behavior34(5): 582–615.
7.
ChangDPennA (1998) Integrated multilevel circulation in dense urban areas: The effect of multiple interacting constraints on the use of complex urban areas. Environment and Planning B25: 507–538.
8.
ChoiYK (1999) The morphology of exploration and encounter in museum layouts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26: 241–250.
9.
Fong P (2003) What makes big dumb bells a mega shopping mall? In: Proceedings of the fourth international space syntax symposium, University College London, London, 17–19 June 2003, pp.10.1–10.14. London: University College London.
10.
GouldP (1983) Reflective distanciation through a metamethodological perspective. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10(4): 381–392.
11.
HaqSZimringC (2003) Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment and Behavior35(1): 132–160.
12.
HillierB (1996) Space is the Machine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HillierB (2002) A theory of the city as object: Or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Urban Design International7: 153–179.
14.
HillierBHansonJ (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HölscherCBrösamleMVrachliotisG (2012) Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: A case study with the space syntax technique. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39(1): 63–82.
16.
HölscherCBüchnerSJMeilingerT (2009) Adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a multi-building ensemble: The effects of spatial structure, task requirements and metric information. Journal of Environmental Psychology29: 208–219.
17.
JiangBClaramuntC (2002) Integration of space syntax into GIS: New perspectives for urban morphology. Transactions in GIS6(3): 295–309.
18.
JiangBOmerI (2007) Spatial topology and its structural analysis based on the concept of simplicial complex. Transactions GIS11(6): 943–960.
19.
JohnsonJH (2013) Hypernetworks in the Science of Complex Systems, London: Imperial College Press.
20.
KimHJunCChoY (2008) Indoor spatial analysis using space syntax. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences37: 1065–1070.
21.
Kong EM, Kim YO and Bang H (2010) An evaluation on the vitalization in shopping complexes using space syntax. In: Proceedings of space syntax eighth international symposium on architectural interchanges in Asia, Kitakyushu International Conference Center, Kitakyushu, Japan, 9–12 November 2010, p.A-47. Architectural Institute of Japan.
22.
MacGillSM (1983) Q-analysis: Into the second decade? A special issue. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10(4): 367–491.
23.
MacGillSM (1984) Cluster analysis and Q-analysis. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies20: 595–604.
24.
MaitlandB (1985) Shopping Malls, Planning and Design, London: Construction Press.
25.
Min SY, Kim YO and Kim CJ (2010) Investigation on spatial intelligibility and spatial cognition for retail facility vitalization. In: Proceedings of space syntax eighth international symposium on architectural interchanges in Asia, Kitakyushu International Conference Center, Kitakyushu, Japan, 9–12 November 2010, p.A-51. Architectural Institute of Japan.
26.
Min SY, Kim CJ and Kim YO (2012) The impacts of spatial configuration and merchandising on the shopping behavior in the complex commercial facilities. In: Proceedings: Eighth international space syntax symposium, Santiago de Chile, 3–6 January 2012, pp.8066:1–8066:15. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
27.
Parvin A, Ye AM and Jia B (2007) Multilevel pedestrian movement: Does visibility make a difference? In: Proceedings of the sixth international space syntax symposium, ITU Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul, 12–15 June 2007, pp.040-01–040-16. Istanbul: ITU Faculty of Architecture.
28.
SongXZhuangYDaiX (2013) Configurational analysis associated with vertical transition on multilevel pedestrian movement. In: KimYOParkHTSeoKW (eds) Proceedings of the ninth international space syntax symposium. 049:1–049:11. . Seoul: Sejong University.
29.
Turner PA and Penn A (1999) Making isovists syntactic: Isovist integration analysis. In: Proceedings of the second international space syntax symposium, March 1999, Brasilia. Vol 1.08, pp.1–9. Brazil: Universidad de Brazil.
30.
Ueno J, Nakazawa A and Kishimoto T (2009) An analysis of pedestrian movement in multilevel complex by space syntax theory – In the case of Shibuya station. In: Proceedings of the seventh international space syntax symposium, pp.118:1–118:12. Stockholm: KTH.
31.
Verdil A (2009) Transformation of space behavior relation: A case study of shopping centers in Istanbul. In: Proceedings of the seventh international space syntax symposium, pp.128:1–128:12. Stockholm: KTH.
32.
Zhang D, Xia F, Yang Z, et al. (2010) Localization technologies for indoor human tracking. In: Fifth international conference on future information technology, Busan, Korea, 21–23 May 2010, pp.1–6. IEEE.
