Perceptions of the Pakistani editors for open access journal publishing: a developing country’s perspective

Abstract

Objectives

This study has been designed to determine Pakistani editors’ perceptions regarding the Open Access (OA) publishing practices of the Higher Education Commission (HEC)-recognized journals in Pakistan, and to assess their best OA publishing models.

Methodology

A structured questionnaire-based survey method of quantitative research approach was adopted to achieve the study’s objectives by collecting data from the editors of all 329 HEC-recognized journals in Pakistan.

Findings

This study exposed that public and teaching institutes are leading in OA journal publishing in Pakistan as compared to private and research institutes. Diamond OA, and Gold OA publishing models are popular among the respondents; however, respondents are not convinced to follow any specific OA publishing model due to their different choices. A large majority (92%) of the journals belong to the Y category (the lowest) of journals. A large majority (72%) of the journals in Pakistan is adopting the Open Journal System (OJS), and parent institutions installed web browsers. CC-BY-NC and CC-BY licenses are their favorite licenses.

Significance

The present study is the first comprehensive study on editors’ perceptions for OA journal publishing and is an effort to fill this gap to invigorate the scholarly literature. This study may enable the journals, editors, and publishers to follow the best OA journal publishing practices of the Pakistani journals for global OA usage of scholarly journals. The results have practical and theoretical ramifications for academic and research institutions, federal and provincial higher education commissioners, policy organizations, and parent institutions of journals.

Keywords

Open Access OA journal publishing practices editors journals Pakistan.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alliance

Building Horizontal

(2021) Radical Open Access. https://radicaloa.disruptivemedia.org.uk/resources/publishing-tools/ (accessed 20 January 2021).

Berlin (2003) Berlin Declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration .

Bethesda (2003) Bethesda statement on open access publishing. https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed 20 January 2021).

Bodaghi

Sanni

SA.

Zainab

(2015) In competition with ISI: the perceptions of chief editors of Malaysian local journals. Learned Publishing 28(4): 251–260.

Cowan

Bulock

(2017) Open access in the world of scholarly journals: creation and discovery. The Serials Librarian 72(1-4): 194–200.

Commons

Creative

(2021) About the license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ (accessed 20 December 2021).

DOAJ (2024) Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org/ (accessed 6 September 2024)

Dunn

Abelson

Bourg

, et al. (2018) Open Access at MIT and Beyond: A White Paper of the MIT Ad Hoc Task Force on Open Access to MIT’s Research. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Edgar

Willinsky

(2010) A survey of scholarly journals using Open Journal Systems. Scholarly and research communication 1(2):1–22.

10.

Gadd

Fry Creaser

(2018) The influence of journal publisher characteristics on open access policy trends. Scientometrics 115(3): 1371–1393.

11.

Hacker

Corrao

(2017) Laying Tracks as the Train Approaches: Innovative Open Access Book Publishing at Heidelberg University from the Editors’ Point of View. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 48(2): 76–89.

12.

Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (2019) HEC Recognized Journals . https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/services/faculty/journals/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 30 September 2019).

13.

Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (2024) Higher Education Commission Journals and Publications Policy 2024. HEC Journals and Publication Policy 2024.pdf (accessed 7 February 2024).

14.

Holley

(2018) Open access: current overview and future prospects. Library Trends 67(2): 214–240.

15.

Huh

Cho

Kim

(2015) Opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, editorial difficulties, and government's support for publishing. Science Editing 2(2): 55.

16.

Hunter

(2010) Moving open access to open source: transitioning an open-access journal into the open journal systems journal management system. Technical Services Quarterly 28(1): 31–40.

17.

Jubb

Goldstein

Amin

(2015). Monitoring the transition to open access: a report for Universities UK. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/90213/1 (accessed 15 October 2020).

18.

Kaspar

(2013) Commentary on Open Access from the JAL Editors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 1(39): 20–22.

19.

Kim

Choi

(2019) Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open-access journals are registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals. Science Editing 6(1): 41–46.

20.

Laakso

(2014) Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 99(2): 475–494.

21.

Misra

Agarwal

(2019) Open access publishing in India: coverage, relevance, and future perspectives. Journal of Korean Medical Science 34(27): e180

22.

Molnar

Schechter

(2010, June) Self Hosting vs. Cloud Hosting: Accounting for the Security Impact of Hosting in the Cloud. In WEIS (Vol. 2010), pp.1–18.

23.

Orton

(2009) Concerns of Editors and Publishers: Plagiarism, Rights of Authors, Open Access, etc. In World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, Munich, Germany, 7–12 September 2009, pp. 5–7. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

24.

Qutab

(2012) Open access movement in Pakistan. Trends in Information Management (TRIM) 4(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265117739

25.

Rafiq

(2022) Institutional repositories (IRs) in universities of Pakistan: issues and emergent framework for remedies. Journal of Academic Librarianship 48(1): 102480.

26.

Raza

Rafiq

Saroya

(2023) Status of open access scholarly journal publishing in Pakistan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 09610006221146301.

27.

Raza

Rafiq

Soroya

(2024) Readiness of Pakistani journals for open-access publishing. The Electronic Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-11-2023-0279

28.

Reinsfelder

Pike

(2018) Using library funds to support open-access publishing through crowdfunding: Going beyond article processing charges. Collection Management 43(2): 138–149.

29.

ROAR (2023) Registry of Open Access Repositories. Registry of Open Access Repositories (eprints.org) (accessed 31 August 2023).

30.

Rubin

(2017) Foundations of library and information science. USA: American Library Association.

31.

Shao

Scherlen

(2007) Perceptions of open access publishing among academic journal editors in China. Serials Review 33(2): 114–121.

32.

Sheikh

(2017) Faculty awareness, use and attitudes towards scholarly open access: a Pakistani perspective. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science: 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742455.

33.

Sheikh

(2020) The international open access movement and its status in Pakistan. portal: Libraries and the Academy 20(1): 15–31.

34.

Shuva

Taisir

(2016) Faculty members' perceptions and use of open access journals: Bangladesh perspective. IFLA Journal 42(1): 36–48.

35.

Stevens

(2013) From the editor: getting what you pay for? open access and the future of humanities publishing. Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 32(1): 7–21.

36.

Ul Haq Akhoon

Ganaie

Khazir

(2018) Research Data Management in Open Access Journals by Developed Countries: A Comparative Study between United States of America and United Kingdom. In 2018 5th international symposium on emerging trends and technologies in libraries and information services (ETTLIS), pp.116–120.