Association of subsequent falls with evidence of dual-task interference while walking in community-dwelling individuals after stroke

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to examine the fall predictive value of single-task walking tests and extent of interference observed in dual-task walking tests in ambulatory individuals post stroke.

Design:

This is an observational study with prospective cohort.

Setting:

The study was conducted at the university laboratory.

Participants:

A total of 91 community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke participated in the study.

Main outcome measures:

Time required to complete a 10-m walk test with and without obstacle negotiation was measured in isolation and in conjunction with performance of a verbal fluency task (category naming). Fall incidence, circumstances, and related injuries were recorded by monthly telephone calls for 12 months.

Results:

A total of 91 individuals (mean (SD) age = 62.7 (8.3) years; mean (SD) post-stroke duration = 8.8 (5.3) years) participated in the study; 29 (32%) of them reported at least one fall during the follow-up period, with a total of 71 fall episodes. There was a significant difference in obstacle-crossing time under single-task (mean difference = 8.3 seconds) and dual-task (mean difference = 7.4 seconds) conditions, and also the degree of interference in mobility performance (increased dual-task obstacle-crossing time relative to the single-task obstacle-crossing time; mean difference = 3.3%) between the fallers and the non-fallers (P < 0.05). After adjusting for the effects of other relevant factors, a greater degree of interference in mobility performance remained significantly associated with a decreased risk of falling (adjusted odds ratio = 0.951, 95% CI = 0.907–0.997, P = 0.037).

Conclusion:

The degree of mobility interference during dual-task obstacle-crossing was the most effective in predicting falls among all the single-task and dual-task walking measure parameters tested. This simple dual-task walking assessment has potential clinical utility in identifying people post stroke at high risk of future falls.

Keywords

Dual-task interference falls stroke walking cognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hyndman

Ashburn

Stack

. Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 165–170.

Jorgensen

Engstad

Jacobsen

. Higher incidence of falls in long-term stroke survivors than in population controls: depressive symptoms predict falls after stroke. Stroke 2002; 33: 542–547.

Forster

Young

. Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. BMJ 1995; 311: 83–86.

Zijlstra

Ufkes

Skelton

, et al. Do dual tasks have an added value over single tasks for balance assessment in fall prevention programs? A mini-review. Gerontology 2008; 54: 40–49.

Woollacott

Shumway-Cook

. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002; 16: 1–14.

Springer

Giladi

Peretz

, et al. Dual-tasking effects on gait variability: the role of aging, falls, and executive function. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 950–957.

Silsupadol

Shumway-Cook

Lugade

, et al. Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 381–387.

Toulotte

Thevenon

Watelain

, et al. Identification of healthy elderly fallers and non-fallers by gait analysis under dual-task conditions. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 269–276.

Muir-Hunter

Wittwer

. Dual-task testing to predict falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2016; 102: 29–40.

10.

Hyndman

Ashburn

Yardley

, et al. Interference between balance, gait and cognitive task performance among people with stroke living in the community. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 849–856.

11.

Moreira

Rodacki

ALF

Pereira

, et al. Does functional capacity, fall risk awareness and physical activity level predict falls in older adults in different age groups. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018; 77: 57–63.

12.

Hyndman

Ashburn

. “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in people with stroke living in the community. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 994–997.

13.

Wong

Xiong

Kwan

, et al. The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009; 28: 81–87.

14.

Golden

Freshwater

. Stroop Color and Word Test: a manual for clinical and experimental uses. Chicago, IL: Stoelting Co., 1978.

15.

Mak

Lau

Law

, et al. Validation of the Chinese translated activities-specific balance confidence scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 496–503.

16.

Gowland

Stratford

Ward

, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke–McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993; 24: 58–63.

17.

Flansbjer

U-B

Holmback

Downham

, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 75–82.

18.

Takatori

Okada

Shomoto

, et al. Effect of a cognitive task during obstacle crossing in hemiparetic stroke patients. Physiother Theory Pract 2012; 28: 292–298.

19.

Kelly

Janke

Shumway-Cook

. Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res 2010; 207: 65–73.

20.

Yang

Pang

. Reliability and validity of dual-task mobility assessments in people with chronic stroke. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0147833.

21.

McCulloch

. Attention and dual-task conditions: physical therapy implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2007; 31: 104–118.

22.

Andersson

Kamwendo

Seiger

, et al. How to identify potential fallers in a stroke unit: validity indexes of four test methods. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 186–191.

23.

Tinetti

Speechley

Ginter

. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1701–1707.

24.

Stalenhoef

Diederiks

JPM

Knottnerus

, et al. A risk model for the prediction of recurrent falls in community-dwelling elderly: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 1088–1094.

25.

Rubenstein

. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 2006; 35: ii37–ii41.

26.

Divani

Vazquez

Barrett

, et al. Risk factors associated with injury attributable to falling among elderly population with history of stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 3286–3292.

27.

Portney

Watkins

. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2008.

28.

Harris

Eng

Marigold

, et al. Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 150–158.

29.

Muir-Hunter

Wittwer

. Dual-task testing to predict falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2016; 102: 29-40.

30.

Yamada

Aoyama

Arai

, et al. Dual-task walk is a reliable predictor of falls in robust elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59: 163–164.

31.

Smulders

Esselink

Weiss

, et al. Assessment of dual tasking has no clinical value for fall prediction in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 2012; 259: 1840–1847.

32.

Etemadi

. Dual task cost of cognition is related to fall risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: a prospective study. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31: 278–284.

33.

Nordin

Moe-Nilssen

Ramnemark

, et al. Changes in step-width during dual-task walking predicts falls. Gait Posture 2010; 32: 92–97.

34.

Kahneman

. Attention and effort. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1973.

35.

Yogev-Seligmann

Hausdorff

Giladi

. Do we always prioritize balance when walking? Towards an integrated model of task prioritization. Mov Disord 2012; 27: 765–770.

36.

Chen

Pillemer

England

, et al. Neural correlates of obstacle negotiation in older adults: an fNIRS study. Gait Posture 2017; 58: 130–135.

37.

Tsang

CSL

Chong

DYK

Pang

MYC

. Cognitive-motor interference in walking after stroke: test–retest reliability and validity of dual-task walking assessments. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 1066–1078.