Validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care: A modified RAND Delphi study in seven European countries (the Europall project)

Abstract

Background:

Validated quality indicators can help health-care professionals to evaluate their medical practices in a comparative manner to deliver optimal clinical care. No international set of quality indicators to measure the organizational aspects of palliative care settings exists.

Aim:

To develop and validate a set of structure and process indicators for palliative care settings in Europe.

Design:

A two-round modified RAND Delphi process was conducted to rate clarity and usefulness of a previously developed set of 110 quality indicators.

Setting/participants:

In total, 20 multi-professional palliative care teams of centers of excellence from seven European countries.

Results:

In total, 56 quality indicators were rated as useful. These valid quality indicators concerned the following domains: the definition of a palliative care service (2 quality indicators), accessibility to palliative care (16 quality indicators), specific infrastructure to deliver palliative care (8 quality indicators), symptom assessment tools (1 quality indicator), specific personnel in palliative care services (9 quality indicators), documentation methodology of clinical data (14 quality indicators), evaluation of quality and safety procedures (1 quality indicator), reporting of clinical activities (1 quality indicator), and education in palliative care (4 quality indicator).

Conclusion:

The modified RAND Delphi process resulted in 56 international face-validated quality indicators to measure and compare organizational aspects of palliative care. These quality indicators, aimed to assess and improve the organization of palliative care, will be pilot tested in palliative care settings all over Europe and be used in the EU FP7 funded IMPACT project.

Keywords

Palliative care Europe structure and process quality indicators RAND Delphi

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization (WHO). 10 facts on aging, April 2012, http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/ageing/en/index.html (accessed 2 October 2012).

World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer fact sheet, February 2012, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ (accessed 2 October 2012).

Radbruch

Payne

. White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 1. Eur J Palliat Care 2009; 16: 278–289.

Radbruch

Payne

. White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 2. Eur J Palliat Care 2010; 17: 22–33.

Campbell

Braspenning

Hutchinson

. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 358–364.

Donabedian

. Methods for deriving criteria for assessing the quality of medical care. Med Care Rev 1980; 37: 653–698.

Mainz

. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15: 523–530.

Berg

Meijerink

Gras

. Feasibility first: developing public performance indicators on patient safety and clinical effectiveness for Dutch hospitals. Health Policy 2005; 75: 59–73.

Marshall

Shekelle

McGlynn

. Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 8–12.

10.

Woitha

Van Beek

Ahmed

. Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 381.

11.

Hasson

Keeney

McKenna

. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32: 1008–1015.

12.

Leemans

Cohen

Francke

. Towards a standardized method of developing quality indicators for palliative care: protocol of the Quality indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC) study. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12: 6.

13.

Fitch

Bernstein

Aguilar

. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001.

14.

Campbell

Ludt

Van Lieshout

. Quality indicators for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care in nine European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008; 15: 509–515.

15.

Hubner-Bloder

Ammenwerth

. Key performance indicators to benchmark hospital information systems—a Delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 508–518.

16.

Engels

Dautzenberg

Campbell

. Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 137–147.

17.

Van Lieshout

Nouwens

Bouma

. Consistency of performance indicators for cardiovascular risk management across procedures and panels. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: e31.

18.

Engels

Van den Hombergh

Mokkink

. The effects of a team-based continuous quality improvement intervention on the management of primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 781–787.

19.

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center. Implementation of quality indicators in palliative care study—Impact. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 2013, EU FP7IMPACT website: http://www.impactpalliativecare.eu/ (accessed June 2013).