Focusing on a sample of 382 African American (206 female) and 264 European American (132 female) students in diverse fourth and fifth grade classrooms, this study investigated three questions concerning the connections between peer groups and academic achievement during early adolescence: (a) How is group structure (i.e., hierarchy and cohesion) associated with group centrality (i.e., status) in the classroom? (b) Does group structure predict academic achievement? and (c) Do peer-group status systems support or undermine academic achievement? Results were similar for African American and European American students. Group hierarchy was positively associated with group centrality but negatively associated with individual academic achievement. Individual status was positively associated with academic achievement. Discussion focuses on multifaceted peer-group influences on academic achievement and implications for educational practice.
Ahn, H-J., Garandeau, C.F., & Rodkin, P.C. ( 2010). Effects of classroom embeddedness and density on the social status of aggressive and victimized children. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 76-101.
2.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N.T., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. ( 1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
3.
Bonacich, P. ( 1991). Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Social Networks, 13, 155-168.
4.
Brown, B.B. ( 1990). Peer groups and peer culture. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171-196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Brown, M.W., & Cudeck. R. ( 1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.
6.
Cairns, R.B., & Cairns, B.D. ( 1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Cillessen, A.H., & Mayeux, L. ( 2007). Expectations and perceptions at school transitions: The role of peer status and aggression. Journal of School Psychology , 45, 567-586.
8.
Cohen, E.G. ( 1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd Ed.). New York : Teachers College Press.
9.
Cohen, E.G., & Lotan, R.A. ( 1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120.
10.
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology , 18, 557-570.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
13.
Cook, K., & Yamagishi, T. ( 1992). Power in exchange networks: A power-dependence formulation . Social Networks, 14, 245-265.
14.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. ( 1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
15.
Crockett, L., Losoff, M., & Petersen, A.C. (1984). Perceptions of the peer group and friendship in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 155-181.
16.
Downey, D.B., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J.W. (2002). The search for oppositional culture among Black students. American Sociological Review , 67, 156-164.
17.
Everett, M.G., & Borgatti, S.P. (2005). Extending centrality. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 57-76). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Farkas, G., Llera, C., & Maczuga, S. ( 2002). Does oppositional culture exist in minority and poverty peer groups? American Sociological Review, 67, 148-155.
19.
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J.U. ( 1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the "burden of ‘acting White.’"The Urban Review, 18, 176-206.
20.
Gest, S.D., Davidson, A.J., Rulison, K.L., Moody, J., & Welsh, J.A. ( 2007). Features of groups and status hierarchies in girls’ and boys’ early adolescent peer networks. In P. C. Rodkin & L. Hanish (Eds.), Social Network Analysis and Children’s Peer Relations. San Francisco: Wiley.
21.
Gest, S.D., Farmer, T.W., Cairns, B.D., & Xie, H. ( 2003). Identifying children’s peer social networks in school classrooms: Links between peer reports and observed interactions. Social Development, 12, 513-529.
22.
Goodenow, C. ( 1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
23.
Graham, S., & Hudley, C. ( 2005). Race and ethnicity in the study of motivation and competence . In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 392-414). New York: Guilford .
24.
Graham, S., Taylor, A.Z., & Hudley, C. ( 1998). Exploring achievement values among ethnic minority early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 606-620.
25.
Hartup, W.W. ( 1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.
26.
Hartup, W.W., & Abecassis, M. ( 2002). Friends and enemies. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social development (pp. 285-306). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27.
Haynie, D.L. ( 2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter ? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013-1057.
28.
Hudley, C., & Graham, S. ( 2001). Stereotypes of achievement striving among early adolescents . Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal , 5, 201-224.
29.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. ( 1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation . In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups (pp. 174-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. ( 2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology , 92, 349-359.
31.
Kindermann, T.A. ( 1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children’s motivation in school. Developmental Psychology, 29, 970-977.
32.
Kwon, K., & Lease, A.M. ( 2009). The interaction between clique type and perceived cohesion on children’s social adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 230-242.
33.
Lempers, J.D., & Clark-Lempers, D.S. (1992). Young, middle, and late adolescents’ comparisons of the functional importance of five significant relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 53-96.
34.
Luthar, S. ( 1995). Social competence in the school setting: Prospective cross-domain associations among inner-city teens. Child Development , 66, 416-429.
35.
Mickelson, R.A. ( 1990). The achievement-attitude paradox among Black students . Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61.
36.
Ogbu, J. ( 1986). The consequences of the American caste system. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children (pp. 19-56). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A. ( 1998). Sociometric popularity and peer perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence , 18, 125-144.
38.
Rodkin, P.C., Farmer, T.W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. ( 2006). They’re cool: Ethnic and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15, 175-204.
39.
Rosenfeld, R.A. ( 1980). Race and sex differences in career dynamics. American Sociological Review, 45, 583-609.
40.
Ryan, A.M. ( 2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72, 1135-1150.
41.
Schafer, M., Korn, S., Brodbeck, F.C., Wolke, D., & Schulz, H. ( 2005). Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 323-335.
42.
Sherif, M. ( 1956). Experiments on group conflict and cooperation. Scientific American, 195, 54-58.
43.
Singer, J.D. ( 1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and linear growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
44.
Steele, C.M., (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual performance and identity. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
45.
Voelkl, K.E. ( 1995). School warmth, participation, and achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 127-138.
46.
Wentzel, K.R. ( 1998). Social support and adjustment in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 202-209.
47.
Wentzel, K.R. ( 2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski , & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531-547). New York: The Guilford Press.
48.
Wentzel, K.R., Barry, K.R., & Caldwell, K.A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195-203.
49.
Willet, J.B., Singer, J.D., & Martin, N.C. ( 1998). The design and analysis of longitudinal studies of development and psychopathology in context: Statistical models and methodological recommendations . Development and Psychopathology, 10, 395-426.
50.
Xie, H., & Shi, B. ( 2009). Gender similarities and differences in preadolescent peer groups: Group structure and ethnic diversity. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 157-183.
51.
Youniss, J. ( 1980). Parents and peers in social development: A Sullivan-Piaget perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
