A Student View of Technology in the Classroom

Abstract

There has been an explosion of classroom technologies, yet there is a lack of research investigating the connection between classroom technology and student learning. This research project explores faculty usage of classroom-based course management software, student usage and opinions of these software tools, and an exploration of whether or not the use of classroom-based course management software enhances student perceptions of learning based on the Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. The authors find that although students enjoy using many of the course management tools, they do not see the tools as highly effective at enhancing the learning experience. When designing courses and considering if or how to use course management tools, it is critical for faculty to consider the connection between the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education and the specific technology tools. Implications of the research findings and suggestions for improved use of classroom management software tools are provided.

Keywords

student learning classroom technology course management software perceptions of technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anonymous. (2004). Blackboard academic suite: Overview of product capabilities. Retrieved from http://library.blackboard.com/docs/AS/Bb_Academic_Suite_Whitepaper_Capabilities.pdf

Arbaugh

J. B.

Hornik

(2006). Do Chickering and Gamson’s seven principles apply to online MBAs? Journal of Educators Online, 3(2), 1-18.

Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2009). Eligibility procedures and standards for business accreditation (pp. 1-78). Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards.asp

Astin

(1996). Involvement in learning revisited: Lessons we have learned. Journal of College Student Development, 3, 123-134.

Barr

R. B.

Tagg

(1995). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change Magazine, 27, 12-25.

Bates

(1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. London, England: Routledge.

Batts

Colaric

S. M.

McFadden

(2006). Online courses demonstrate use of seven principles. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 3(12), 15-26.

Bok

D. C.

(2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Boorstin

(2011, February 1). TV content, advertising are king, smartphones on the rise. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/id/41372312/TV_Content_Advertising_Are_King_Smartphones_On_the_Rise

10.

Bradford

Porciello

Balkon

Backus

(2007). The Blackboard learning system. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35, 301-314.

11.

Braxton

J. M.

Sullivan

A. V. S.

Johnson

R. M.

Jr. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In Smart

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 107-164). New York, NY: Agathon Press.

12.

Cavanaugh

(2004). Development and management of virtual schools: Issues and trends. Hershey, PA: Information Science.

13.

Celsi

R. L.

Wolfinbarger

(2002). Discontinuous classroom innovation: Waves of change for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 64-72.

14.

Chickering

A. W.

Ehrmann

S. C.

(1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as a lever. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 49(2), 3-6.

15.

Chickering

A. W.

Gamson

Z. F.

(1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.

16.

Chickering

A. W.

Gamson

Z. F.

(1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

17.

Chizmar

J. F.

Walbert

M. S.

(1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practices. Journal of Economic Education, 30, 248-259.

18.

Clark

R. E.

Yates

Early

Moulton

(2009). An analysis of the failure of electronic media and discovery-based learning: Evidence for the performance benefits of guided training methods. In Silber

K. H.

Foshay

W. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of training and improving workplace performance. Vol. 1: Instructional design and training delivery. Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.

19.

Clarke

III Flaherty

T. B.

Mottner

(2001). Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 169-177.

20.

Cohen

P. A.

(1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-309.

21.

d’Apollonia

Abrami

P. C.

(1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1198-1208.

22.

Dillon

Gabbard

(1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.

23.

Garrison

D. R.

Anderson

Archer

(1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

24.

Graham

Cagiltay

Lim

Craner

Duffy

T. M.

(2001). Seven principles of effective teaching: A practical lens of evaluating online courses. Technology Source. Retrieved from http://technologysource.org/article/seven_principles_of_effective_teaching

25.

Granitz

Koernig

S. K.

(2011). Web 2.0 and marketing education: Explanations and experiential applications. Journal of Marketing Education. Retrieved from http://jmd.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/02/20/0273475310392539

26.

Hiltz

S. R.

(1998, November 7-12). Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Building learning communities. In WebNet 98 World Conference of the WWW, Internet, and Intranet Proceedings, Orlando, FL.

27.

House

J. D.

(1993). Achievement expectancies as predictors of academic performance. International Journal of Instructional Media, 20, 213-223.

28.

Hunt

Eagle

Kitchen

(2004). Balancing marketing education and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match? Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 75-88.

29.

Hutchins

H. M.

(2003). Instructional immediacy and the seven principles: Strategies for facilitating online courses. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(3), 1-10.

30.

Kolb

A. Y.

Kolb

D. A.

(2005). The Kolb learning style inventory—Version 3.1. Technical specifications. Retrieved from http://learningfromexperience.com/media/2010/08/Tech_spec_LSI.pdf

31.

Kolb

D. A.

(1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In Chickering

(Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 232-255). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

32.

Kvavik

R. B.

Handberg

M. N.

(2000). Transforming student services: The University of Minnesota takes a fresh look at client/institution interaction. Educase Quarterly, 23(2), 30-37.

33.

Lane

L. M.

(2008). Toolbox or trap: Course management systems and pedagogy. Educase Quarterly, 31(2), 4-6.

34.

Lenhart

Purcell

Smith

Zickuhr

(2010). Social media and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx

35.

Mathieson

(2010). The on-demand brand: 10 rules for digital marketing success in an anytime, everywhere world. New York, NY: AMACOM Books.

36.

McKeachie

W. J.

Pintrich

P. R.

Lin

Smith

D. A. F.

(1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post Secondary Teaching and Learning.

37.

McNaughton

(2011). 83% of millennials online use social networking sites. Retrieved from http://twtrcon.com/2011/01/03/83-of-millennials-online-use-social-networking-sites/

38.

Meuter

M. L.

Chapman

K. J.

Toy

Wright

L. K.

McGowan

(2009). Reducing content variance and improving student learning outcomes: The value of standardization in a multisection course. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 109-110.

39.

Nicol

D. J.

MacFarlane-Dick

(2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218.

40.

Oliver

(1996). Measuring users’ performance with interactive information systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 12, 89-102.

41.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T.

(1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.

42.

Perry

R. P.

Smart

J. C.

(1997). Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice. New York, NY: Agathon Press.

43.

Priluck

(2004). Web-assisted courses for business education: An examination of two sections of Principles of Marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 161-173.

44.

Sadler

D. R.

(1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5, 77-84.

45.

Shea

P. J.

Pickett

A. M.

Pelz

W. E.

(2003). A follow-up investigation of “teaching presence” in the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 61-80.

46.

Sims

R. R.

Sims

S. J.

(1995). Learning enhancement in higher education. In Sims

R. R.

Sims

S. J.

(Eds.), The importance of learning styles: Understanding the implications for learning, course design and education (pp. 1-24). Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.

47.

Sorcinelli

M. D.

(1991). Research findings on the seven principles. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991(47), 13-25.

48.

Stage

F. K.

Hossler

(2000). Where is the student? Linking student behaviors, college choice, and college persistence. In Braxton

J. M.

(Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 170-195). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

49.

Sweeney

J. C.

Ingram

(2001). A comparison of traditional and web-based tutorials in marketing education: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 55-62.

50.

Tavani

Losh

S. C.

(2003). Motivation, self-confidence and expectations as predictors of the academic performances among students. Child Study Journal, 33, 141-152.

51.

Ueltschy

L. C.

(2001). An exploratory study of integrating interactive technology into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 63-72.

52.

Young

M. R.

Klemz

B. R.

Murphy

J. W.

(2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 130-142.

53.

Zickuhr

(2010, December 16). Generations 2010. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Generations-2010/Overview.aspx