Although not new, the use of psychoanalysis to study, assess, and work with organizations is certainly not central to the field of public administration. This article argues that psychoanalysis adds value to rational-technical reforms because in addition to addressing the structural and rational aspects of organizations, it focuses on the implicit, unconscious, and often covert influences that can hinder individual and organizational performance. The authors focus on six key issues within public administration—task, autonomy, authority, responsiveness, finances, and accountability—arguing that psychoanalysis helps illuminate the conscious and unconscious dynamics that influence each. The article concludes by supporting the combined use of rational-technical and psychoanalytic approaches in order to help individuals and organizations risk and tolerate change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, G. T. (1992). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (3rd ed., pp. 457-475). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1979)
2.
Baum, H. (1993). Organizational politics against organizational culture: A psychoanalytic perspective. In L. Hirschhorn, & C. K. Barnett (Eds.), The psychodynamics of organizations (pp. 33-48). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3.
Bion, W. (1959). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Carr, A. W. (1991). Organizations as symbols: A study of a church. In E. R. Shapiro & A. W. Carr (Eds.), Lost in familiar places: Creating new connections between the individual and society (pp. 97-110). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2001). Organization development and change. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
6.
Czander, W. M. (1993). The psychodynamics of work and organizations: Theory and application. New York: Guilford.
7.
Denhardt, R. B. (1981). In the shadow of organization. Lawrence: Regents Press of Kansas.
8.
Denhardt, R. B. (1995). Public administration: An action orientation (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9.
Diamond, M. A. (1991). Stresses of group membership: Balancing the needs for independence and belonging. In M. F. R. Kets de Vries & Associates (Eds.), Organizations on the couch: Clinical perspectives on organizational behavior and change (pp. 191-214). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Diamond, M. A. (1993a). Bureaucracy as externalized self-system: A view from the psychological interior. In L. Hirschhorn & C. K. Barnett (Eds.), The psychodynamics of organizations (pp. 219-236). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11.
Diamond, M. A. (1993b). The unconscious life of organizations: Interpreting organizational identity. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
12.
Diamond, M. A. (1998). The symbiotic lure: Organizations as defective containers. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 20, 315-325.
13.
Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1, 335-350.
14.
Frederickson, H. G. (1999, September). The repositioning of American public administration. The John Gaus Lecture, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
15.
Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich & E. Mason (Eds.), Public policy 1 (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Friedrich, C. J. (1972). Tradition and authority. New York: Praeger.
17.
Golembiewski, R. T. (1967). Men, management, and morality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Golembiewski, R. T. (1985). Humanizing public organizations. Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond.
19.
Goodsell, C. T. (1983). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
20.
Hirschhorn, L. (1988). The workplace within. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Hirschhorn, L., & Barnett, C. K. (Eds.). (1993). The psychodynamics of organizations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
22.
Jaques, E. (1957). Social systems as defence against persecutory and depressive anxiety: A contribution to the psycho-analytical study of social processes. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, & R. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis (pp. 478-498). New York: Basic Books.
23.
Jaques, E. (1976). A general theory of bureaucracy. London: Gower.
24.
Krantz, J. (1999). Comment on “challenging ‘resistance to change.’” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 42-45.
25.
Lacan, J. (1968). The language of the self: The function of language in psychoanalysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
26.
Levinson, H. (1972). Organizational diagnosis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Levinson, H. (1994). Diagnosing organizations systematically. In M. F. R. Kets de Vries & Associates (Eds.), Organizations on the couch: Clinical perspectives on organizational behavior and change (pp. 45-68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1981). Managing the public’s business: The job of the government executive. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Menzies Lyth, I. E. (1988). Containing anxiety in institutions: Selected essays, Volume 1. London: Free Association Books. (Original work published 1961)
30.
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Obholzer, A. (1996). Psychoanalytic contributions to authority and leadership issues. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 17, 53-56.
32.
Obholzer, A., & Roberts, V. Z. (Eds.). (1994). The unconscious at work: Individual and organizational stress in the human services. London: Routledge.
33.
Peters, B. G. (1984). The politics of bureaucracy (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
34.
Rank, O. (1941). Beyond psychology. New York: Dover.
35.
Rice, A. K. (1958). Productivity and social organisations: The Ahmeddabad experiment. London: Tavistock.
36.
Rice, A. K. (1963). The enterprise and its environment. London: Tavistock.
37.
Rohr, J. A. (1978). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values. New York: Marcel Dekker.
38.
Scharff, J. S., & Scharff, D. E. (1992). Scharff notes: A primer of object relations therapy. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
39.
Shapiro, E. R., & Carr, A. W. (1991). Lost in familiar places: Creating new connections between the individual and society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Stein, M., & Hollwitz, J. (Eds.). (1992). Psyche at work: Workplace applications of Jungian analytical psychology. Wilmette, IL: Chiron.
41.
Stokes, J. (1994). The unconscious at work in groups and teams: Contributions from the work of Wilfred Bion. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work: Individual and organizational stress in the human services (pp. 19-27). London: Routledge.
42.
Terry, L. D. (1995). Leadership of public bureaucracies: The administrator as conservator. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Wamsley, G. L. (1990). The agency perspective: Public administration as agential leaders. In G. L. Wamsley, R. N. Bacher, C. T. Goodsell, R. Kronenberg, J. Rohr, C. Stivers, O. White, & J. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 114-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
45.
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 37-55). London: Hogarth.
46.
Zaleznik, A. (1995). The case for not interpreting unconscious material mental life in consulting to organizations. Psychiatry, 58, 357-371.
47.
Zanetti, L., & Carr, A. (1998). Exploring the psychodynamics of political change. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 20(3), 358-376.
