The coordination of planning among local governments is an important strategy for addressing many challenges that go beyond geographical or political jurisdictions such as those related to transportation congestion, educational performance, public safety, and the environment. This study examines the use of planning coordination and factors associated with its use. Based on a national survey and in-depth interviews among jurisdictions with populations of more than 50,000, the study finds that about 40% of jurisdictions frequently use coordinated, comprehensive plans, most commonly in public safety, traffic congestion, transit planning, and economic development. Among respondents, 78.7% agree or strongly agree that coordination with other jurisdictions and organizations is important in solving complex community problems. The perceived effectiveness of other jurisdictions and the presence of a revitalized management work culture are important factors associated with the increased use of such planning.
Aberbach, J., & Rockman, B. (2000). In the web of politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2.
Bellone, C., & Goerl, G. (1992). Reconciling public entrepreneurship and democracy. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 130-145.
3.
Berman, E., & Werther, W. (1996). Broad-based consensus building. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(3), 61-72.
4.
Bretschneider, S., & Gorr, W. (1992). Economic, organizational, and political influences on biases in forecasting state sales tax receipts. International Journal of Forecasting, 7, 457-466.
5.
Brooks, A. (2002). Can nonprofit management help answer public management's “big questions?”Public Administration Review, 62, 259-260.
6.
Bryson, J. (1992). Leadership for the common good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Bryson, J. (1995). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Caves, F., & Cullingsworth, B. (2003). Planning in the USA: Policies, issues and processes. Boston: Routledge.
9.
Chrislip, D., & Larson, C. (1996). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Cohen, S. (2002). The effective public manager: Achieving public success in a changing government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Dees, J., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits. New York: John Wiley.
12.
DeLeeuw, E. (1999). Healthy cities: Urban social entrepreneurship for health. Health Promotion International, 14, 261-269.
13.
Doig, J.,& Hargrove, E. (1987). Leadership and innovation: Abiographical perspective on entrepreneurs in government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Donald, C., Lyons, T.,& Tribbey, R. (2001). Apartnership for strategic planning and management in a public organization. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(2), 176-193.
15.
Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as competitive and entrepreneurial as business. California Management Journal, 1(1), 3-5.
16.
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row.
17.
Duhl, L. (1995). The social entrepreneurship of change. New York: Pace University Press.
18.
Dunn, D.,& Legge, J. (2002). Politics and administration in USlocal governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12, 401-422.
19.
Fredrickson, G. (1982). The recovery of civicism in public administration. Public Administration Review, 42(1), 501-508.
20.
Fredrickson, G., & Hart, D. (1995). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45(1), 547-554.
21.
French, P. E.,& Folz, D. H. (2004). Executive behavior and decision making in small U.S. cities. American Reviewof Public Administration, 34(1), 52-66.
22.
Hart, D. (1984). The virtuous citizen, the honorable bureaucrat and “public administration.” Public Administration Review, 44(1), 111-120.
23.
Hays, S., & Kearney, R. (2001). Anticipated changes in human resource management: Views from the field. Public Administration Review, 61, 585-597.
24.
Herman, R.,& Redina, D. (2001). Donor reactions to commercial activities of nonprofit organizations: An American case study. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(2), 157-169.
25.
Holley, L., Dufner, D., & Reed, B. (2004). Strategic information systems planning (SISP) in U.S. county governments: Will the real SISP model please stand up?Public Performance and Management Review, 27(3), 102-126.
26.
Huggins, R. (2000). The success and failure of policy-implemented inter-firm network initiatives: Motivations, processes and structure. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1), 11-35.
27.
International City Management Association. (2004). Municipal yearbook: 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Kearney, R.,& Scavo, C. (2001). Reinventing government in reformed municipalities: Manager, mayor and council actions. Urban Affairs Review, 37(1), 43-66.
29.
Keast, R., Mandell, M., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64, 363-377.
30.
Kelly, E., & Becker, B. (2000). Community planning: An introduction to the comprehensive plan. Milldale, CT: Milldale Press.
31.
Kettl, D. (2000). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32.
Kettl, D. (2003). Contingent coordination: Practical and theoretical puzzles for homeland security. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 253-277.
33.
Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas alternatives and public policies(2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
34.
Klingner, D., Nalbandian, J., & Romzek, B. (2002). Politics, administration, and markets: Conflicting expectations and accountability. The American Review of Public Administration, 32(1), 117-144.
35.
Ledbetter, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Viking.
36.
Lee, M. (2002). Non-profits and social entrepreneurship: Taking the good, avoiding the bad. PATimes, 25(8), 2-3.
37.
Lewis, E. (1980). Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic power. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
38.
Melkers, J.,& Willoughby, K. (1998). The state of the states: Performance-basedbudgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 66-73.
39.
Morrish, W., & Brown, C. (2000). Planning to stay. Washington, DC: Milkweed Editions.
40.
Mouritzen, P., & Svara, J. (2002). Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
41.
Moynihan, D. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC. American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164-188.
42.
Moynihan, D., & Ingraham, P. (2003). Look for the silver lining: When performance based accountability systems work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 469-490.
43.
Orfield, M., & Rusk, D. (1997). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
44.
Osborne, D.,& Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley.
45.
Ostgaard, T., & Birley, S. (1994). Personal networks and firm competitive strategy—A strategic or coincidental match?Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 281-305.
46.
Page, S. (2004). Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaboratives. Public Administration Review, 64, 591-606.
47.
Peters, B., & Savoie, D. (2001). Governance in the twenty-first century: Revitalizing the public service. London: McGill-Queens University Press.
48.
Peters, T. (1997). The circle of innovation. New York: Vintage.
49.
Poister, T., & Van Slyke, D. (2002). Strategic management innovation in state transportation departments. Public Productivity and Management Review, 26(1), 58-74.
50.
Prabhu, G. (1999). Social entrepreneurship leadership. Career Development International, 4(3), 140-145.
51.
Rainey, H., & Steinbauer, P. (2002). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. In R. Stillman (Ed.), Public administration: Concepts and cases(pp. 1-32). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
52.
Reis, T. (1999). Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. Battle Creek, MI: WK Kellogg Foundation.
53.
Rich, M., Giles, M.,& Stern, E. (2001). Collaborating to reduce poverty: Views from city halls and community based organizations. Urban Affairs Review, 37(2), 184-204.
54.
Roberts, A. (2004). Apartial revolution: The diplomatic ethos and transparency in intergovernmental organizations. Public Administration Review, 64, 408-422.
55.
Rusk, D. (2003). Cities without suburbs: A census 2000 update. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Press.
56.
Simmons, J., & Simmons, S. (2004). Structural conflict in contemporary cities. The American Review of Public Administration, 34, 374-388.
57.
Simon, H. (1998). Why public administration?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 1-12.
58.
Sinclair, T. A. (2002). From community building to governing strangers: Reconceptualizing institutional relationships among governments, community organizations and individuals. American Review of Public Administration, 32, 312-312.
59.
Svara, J. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementary of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176-183.
60.
Teisman, G., & Klijn, E. (2002). Partnership agreements: Governmental rhetoric or governance scheme?Public Administration Review, 62, 749-753.
61.
Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship: A new look at the people and potential. Management Decision, 38, 338-348.
62.
Timmons, J. (1989). The entrepreneurial mind. Boston: Brick House.
63.
Vigoda, E., & Golembiewski, R. T. (2001). Citizenship behavior and the spirit of new managerialism: A theoretical framework and challenge for governance. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 273-295.
64.
Visser, J. A. (2002). Understanding local government cooperation in urban regions: Toward a cultural model of interlocal relations. American Review of Public Administration, 32(1), 40-65.
65.
Wheeland, C. (2003). Implementing a community-wide strategic plan: Rock Hill's empowering vision 10 years later. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 46-69.
66.
Young, M. (1997, February 21). Do-gooders with savvy. New Statesman, p. 20-20.
