This paper describes the use of a Bayesian network to provide context-aware shared control of a robot mobility aid for the frail blind. The robot mobility aid, PAM-AID, is a “smart walker” that aims to assist the frail and elderly blind to walk safely indoors. The Bayesian network combines user input with high-level information derived from the sensors to provide a context-aware estimate of the user’s current navigation goals. This context-aware action selection mechanism facilitates the use of a very simple, low bandwidth user interface, which is critical for the elderly user group. The PAM-AID systems have been evaluated through a series of field trails involving over 30 potential users.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bell, D. A. 1994. Modelling Human Behaviour for Adaptation in Human-Machine Systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2.
Benjamin, J. M. Jr. 1973 (November). The new c-5 laser cane for the blind . Proceedings of the 1973 Carahan Conference on Electronic Prosthetics, University of Kentucky Bulletin 104, pp. 77–82 .
3.
Birren, J. 1959. Handbook of Ageing and the Individual. Chicago: Chicago University Press .
4.
Borenstein, J., and Ulrich, I. 1997. The guide cane—A computerized travel aid for the active guidance of blind pedestrians . IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, April, pp. 1283–1288 .
5.
Borgolte, U., Hoelper, R., Hoyer, H., Heck, H., Humann, W., Nedza, J., Craig, I., Valleggi, R., and Sabatini, A. M. 1995. Intelligent control of a semi-autonomous omnidirectional wheelchair . Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Intelligent Robotics systems (SIRS’95), Pisa, Italy, July, pp. 113–120 .
6.
Bruce, I., McKennell, A., and Walker, E. 1991. Blind and Partially Sighted Adults in Britain: The RNIB Survey, vol. 1. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office .
7.
Campbell, V. A., Crews, J. E., Moriarty, D. G., Zack, M. M., and Blackman, D. K. 1999 (December 17). Surveillance for sensory impairment, activity limitation and health-related quality of life among older adults—United States, 1993–1997. In CDC Surveillance Summaries, number SS-8:48 in MMWR 1999. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .
8.
Craig, I., and Nesbit, P. 1993 (May). The smart wheelchair: An augmentative mobility toolkit. In ECART 2. Stockholm: Swedish Handicap Institute .
9.
Dubowsky, S., Genot, F., Godding, S., Kozono, H., Skwersky, A., Yu, H., and Yu, L. S. 2000. Pamm—A robotic aid to the elderly for mobility assistance and monitoring: A “helping-hand” for the elderly . IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, April, pp. 570–576 .
10.
Egawa, S., Nemoto, Y., Fujie, M., Koseki, A., Hattori, S., and Ishi, T. 1999. Power-assisted walking support system with imbalance compensation for hemiplegics . Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Serving Humanity, Advancing Technology, Atlanta, GA, p. 635-635 .
11.
Engelberger, J. F. 1989. Robotics in Service. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
12.
Engelhardt, K. G., and Edwards, R. A. 1992. Human-robot interaction. In Human-Robot Integration for Service Robots, ed. M. Rahimi and W. Karwowski, 315–346. London: Taylor and Francis .
13.
Eurostat Press Office. 1999. Regional population of the EU ageing at different speeds up to 2025. In Statistics in Focus 4/99. Luxembourg: Author .
14.
Farmer, L. W. 1987. Foundations of orientation and mobility. In Mobility Devices, pp. 357–401. New York: American Foundation for the Blind .
15.
Forsberg, J., Larsson, U., and Wernersson, A. 1995. Mobile robot navigation using the range weighted hough transform. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, March, pp. 18–26.
16.
Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D.Hovel, D., and Rommelse, K. 1998. The lumiere project: Bayesian user modelling for inferring the goals and needs of software users . Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in AI, Madison, WI, July, pp. 256–265 .
17.
Karlsson, M. 1995. Elderly and new technology—On the introduction of new technology into everyday life. In The European Context for Assistive Technology, ed. I. Placencia Porrero and R. Puig de la Bellacasa, 78–81. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS .
18.
Katevas, N., Tzafestas, S., Koutsouris, D., and Pnevmatikatos, C. 1997. The senario autonomous navigation system . Proceedings of the First Mobinet Symposium, Athens, Greece, May, pp. 87–99 .
19.
Kay, L. 1996. A sonar aid to enhance the spatial perception of the blind: Engineering design and evaluation . Radio and Electronic Engineer44(11): 605–627 .
20.
Kristensen, S. 1996. Sensor Planning with Bayesian Decision Analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Alborg University, Denmark.
21.
Lacey, G., and Dawson-Howe, K. M. 1998. The application of robotics to a mobility aid for the blind . Robotics and Autonomous Systems23(4): 245–252 .
22.
Lacey, G., MacNamara, S., and Dawson-Howe, K. M. 1986. Lecture notes in AI: Assistive technology and artificial intelligence. In Personal Adaptive Mobility Aid for the Frail and Elderly Blind, ed. V. Mittal, H. Yanco, J. Aronis, and R. Simpson, 211–220. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag .
23.
MacNamara, S., and Lacey, G. 2000. A smart walker for the frail visually impaired . Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1354–1359 .
24.
Madarasz, R. L., Heiny, L. C., Cromp, R. F., and Mazur, N. M. 1986. The design of an autonomous vehicle for the disabled . IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation2(3): 117–126 .
25.
Molton, N., Se, S., Brady, J. M., Lee, D., and Probert, P. 1998. A stereo vision based aid for the visually impaired . Image and Vision Computing16(4): 251–263 .
26.
Mori, H., Yasutomi, S., Charkari, N. M., Yamaguchi, K., Nishikawa, K., and Kotani, S. 1992. Guide dog robot harunobu-5 . Proceedings of SPIE Mobile Robots VII Conference, Cambridge, MA, pp. 388–402 .
27.
Nemoto, Y., Egawa, S., Koseki, A., Hattori, S., Ishi, T., and Fujie, M. 1998. Power-assisted walking support system for elderly . Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Hong Kong, China, vol. 20, pp. 2693–2695 .
28.
Nielsen, J. 1994. Cost-justifying usability. In Guerrilla HCI: Using Discount Usability Engineering to Penetrate the Intimidation Barrier, ed. R. G. Bias and D. J. Mayhew. Boston: Academic Press .
29.
O’Hart, F., and Foster, G. T. 1999. Creating dynamic mobile robot environments from an intelligent building. In Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 243: Progress in System and Robot Analysis and Control Design, ed. S. G. Tzafestas and G. Schmidt, 505–514. London/Berlin: Springer-Verlag .
30.
Richards, B. 1993. Results of a survey carried out by the Hampshire Association for the Care of the Blind. Hampshire Association for the Care of the Blind, Hampshire, UK .
31.
Rubin, G. S., and Salive, M. E. 1995. The Women’s Health and Ageing Study: Health and social characteristics of older women with disability. In Vision and Hearing, ed. J. M. Guralnik, L. P. Fried, E. M. Simonsick, J. D. Kasper, and M. E. Lafferty, NIH Pub. No. 95-4009. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Ageing .
32.
Russell, L. 1965. Travel pathsounder . Proceedings of the Rotterdam Mobility Conference, New York, May, pp. 73–78 . American Foundation for the Blind Press.
33.
Schraft, R. D., Schaeffer, C., and May, T. 1998. Care-obot: The concept of a system for assisting elderly or disabled persons in home environments . IECON: Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the IEEE, Aachen, Germany, pp. 2476–2481 .
34.
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press .
35.
Sheridan, T. B. 1992. Telerobotics, Automation and Human Supervisory Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
36.
Shoval, S., Borenstein, J., and Koren, Y. 1994. Mobile robot obstacle avoidance in computerized travel aid for the blind . Proceedings IEEE Robotics and Automation Conference, San Diego, CA, May, pp. 2023–2029 .
37.
Simpson, R. 1997. Improved Automatic Adaptation through the Combination of Multiple Information Sources. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
38.
Tachi, S., and Komoriya, K. 1985. Guide dog robot. In Second International Symposium of Robotic Research, ed. H. Hanafusa and H. Inoue, 333–340. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
39.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1995 (May). Sixty-Five Plus in the United States. Washington, DC: Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce .
40.
Virzi, R. A. 1992. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human Factors34(4): 457–468 .
41.
Wachsmuth, S., Brant-Pook, H., Socher, G., Kummert, F., and Sagerer, G. 1999. Multi level integration of vision and speech using Bayesian networks . International Conference on Vision Systems, Grand Canary, Spain, January.
