Task Compatibility of Manipulator Postures

Abstract

In performing a manipulation task, humans tend to adopt arm postures that most effectively utilize the motion and strength capabilities of the arm. Selecting arm postures that are compatible with the task requirements has become almost instinctive to humans. By mimicking this approach in robotic manipulation, we can exploit the full capability of a manipu lator in performing a task. An index is proposed for measur ing the compatibility of manipulator postures with respect to a generalized task description. The manipulator is viewed as a mechanical transformer, with joint space velocity and force as input and task space velocity and force as output. Optimi zation of the index corresponds to matching the velocity and force transmission characteristics to the task requirements. The applications of this index to manipulator redundancy utilization and workspace design are also discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asada, H. , and Youcef-Toumi, K. 1984a. Development of a direct-drive arm using high torque brushless motors. In Robotics research: the first international symposium, eds. M. Brady and R. Paul, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 583-599.

Asada, H. , and Youcef-Toumi, K. 1984b. Analysis and design of a direct-drive arm with a five-bar-link parallel drive mechanism. ASME J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. and Control 106:225 -230.

Chiu, S. 1987 (March, Raleigh, N.C.). Control of redundant manipulators for task compatibility. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1718-1724.

Dubey, R. , and Luh, J.Y.S. 1986 (Dec., Anaheim). Performance measures and their improvement for redundant robots. Proc. ASME Winter Annual Meeting, DSC-Vol. 3, pp. 143-151.

Hollerbach, J. , and Suh, K.C. 1985 (March, St. Louis). Redundancy resolution of manipulators through torque optimization. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1016-1021.

Kerr, J. , and Roth, B. 1986 (April, San Francisco). Special grasping configuration with dexterous hands. Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1361-1367.

Khatib, O. 1983 (Dec., New Delhi). Dynamic control of manipulators in operational space. Proc. Sixth CISM-IFToMM Congress on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms. New Delhi: Wiley, pp. 1128-1131.

Klein, C. 1985. Use of redundancy in the design of robotic systems. In Robotics research: the second international symposium, eds H. Hanafusa and H. Inoue , Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 207-214.

Konstantinov, M. , Patarinski, S. , Zamanov, V. , and Nenchev, D. 1982 (June, Paris). A contribution to the inverse kinematic problem for industrial robots. Proc. 12th Int. Symp. on Industrial Robots, pp. 459-468.

10.

Li, Z. , and Sastry, S. 1987 (March, Raleigh, N.C.) Task oriented optimal grasping by multifingered robot hands. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 389-394.

11.

Liegeois, A. 1977. Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multibody mechanisms. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybern. SMC-7(12):868-871.

12.

Yoshikawa, T. 1984. Analysis and control of robot manipulators with redundancy . In Robotics research: the first international symposium, eds. M. Brady and R. Paul , Cambridge: MIT Press , pp. 735-747.

13.

Yoshikawa, T. 1985. Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. In Robotics research: the second international symposium, eds. H. Hanafusa and H. Inoue , Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 439-446.