Postural Stability of Biped Robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) Point

Abstract

The focus of this paper is the problem of foot rotation in biped robots during the single-support phase. Foot rotation is an indication of postural instability, which should be carefully treated in a dynamically stable walk and avoided altogether in a statically stable walk.

We introduce the foot-rotation indicator (FRI) point, which is a point on the foot/ground-contact surface where the net ground-reaction force would have to act to keep the foot stationary. To ensure no foot rotation, the FRI point must remain within the convex hull of the foot-support area.

In contrast with the ground projection of the center of mass (GCoM), which is a static criterion, the FRI point incorporates robot dynamics. As opposed to the center of pressure (CoP)—better known as the zero-moment point (ZMP) in the robotics literature—which may not leave the support area, the FRI point may leave the area. In fact, the position of the FRI point outside the footprint indicates the direction of the impending rotation and the magnitude of rotational moment acting on the foot. Owing to these important properties, the FRI point helps not only to monitor the state of postural stability of a biped robot during the entire gait cycle, but indicates the severity of instability of the gait as well. In response to a recent need, the paper also resolves the misconceptions surrounding the CoP/ZMP equivalence.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arakawa, T., and Fukuda, T. 1997 (Albuquerque, NM). Natural motion generation of a biped locomotion robot using the hierarchical trajectory generation method consisting of GA, EP layers . Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Robot. and Automat., vol. 1. Washington, DC: IEEE, pp. 211–216 .

Banach, S. 1951. Mechanics. Warszawa, Poland: Monografie Matematyczne . (Trans. by E. J. Scott.)

Coussi, O., and Bessonet, G. 1995. ZMP et centre de pression (in French). unpublished.

Espiau, B. 1998. Center of pressure and the zero-moment point. Unpublished.

Fujimoto, Y., and Kawamura, A. 1996 (Minneapolis, MN). Proposal of biped walking control based on robust hybrid position/force control . Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Robot. and Automat., vol. 3. Washington, DC: IEEE, pp. 2724–2740 .

Goswami, A., Thuilot, B., and Espiau, B. 1998. A study of the passive gait of a compass-like biped robot: Symmetry and chaos . Intl. J. Robot. Res. 17(12).

Hayashi, C. 1985. Nonlinear Oscillations in Physical Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .

Hemami, H., and Golliday, C. L. 1977. The inverted pendulum and biped stability . Math. Biosci. 34(1–2): 95–110 .

Hirai, K., Hirose, M., Haikawa, Y., and Takenaka, T. 1998 (Leuvin, Belgium). The development of the Honda humanoid robot . Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Robot. and Automat. Washington, DC: IEEE.

10.

Lee, W., and Raibert, M. 1991 (Sacramento, CA). Control of hoof rolling in an articulated leg . Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Robot. and Automat. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.

11.

Li, Q., Takanishi, A., and Kato, I. 1992. Learning control of compensative trunk motion for a biped walking robot based on ZMP stability criterion . Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intell. Robot. and Sys. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.

12.

Li, Q., Takanishi, A., and Kato, I. 1993. Learning control for a biped walking robot with a trunk . Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intell. Robot. and Sys. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, pp. 1771–1777 .

13.

Patla, A., Frank, J., and Winter, D. 1990. Assessment of balance control in the elderly: Major issues . Canadian Physiotherapy 42: 89–97 .

14.

Shih, C.-L. 1996. The dynamics and control of a biped walking robot with seven degrees of freedom . ASME J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 118(Dec.): 683–690 .

15.

Shih, C.-L., Li, Y. Z., Churng, S., Lee, T. T., and Gruver, W. A. 1990. Trajectory synthesis and physical admissibility for a biped robot during the single-support phase . Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intell. Robot. and Sys. (IROS). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, pp. 1646–1652 .

16.

Takanishi, A., Ishida, M., Yamazaki, Y., and Kato, I. 1985. The realization of dynamic walking by the biped robot WL-10RD . Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Adv. Robot. Tokyo, pp. 459–466 .

17.

Takanishi, A., Takeya, T., Karaki, H., and Kato, I. 1990. A control method for dynamic biped walking under unknown external force . Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intell. Robot. and Sys. (IROS). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, pp. 795–801 .

18.

Vukobratovic, M. 1973. How to control artificial anthropomorphic systems . IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybernet. 3(5): 497–507 .

19.

Vukobratovic, M., Borovac, B., Surla, D., and Stokic, D. 1990. Scientific Fundamentals of Robotics 7. Biped Locomotion: Dynamics Stability, Control, and Application. New York: Springer-Verlag .

20.

Vukobratovic, M., Frank, A. A., and Juricic, D. 1970. On the stability of biped locomotion . IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 17(1): 25–36 .

21.

Vukobratovic, M., and Juricic, D. 1969. Contributions to the synthesis of biped gait . IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 16: 1–6 .

22.

Vukobratovic, M., and Timcenko, O. 1996. Experiments with nontraditional hybrid control of biped locomotion robots . J. Intell. Robot. Sys. 16: 25–43 .

23.

Winter, D., Ruder, G. D., and MacKinnon, C. D. 1990. Control of balance of upper body during gait. In Winters, J. M., and Woo, S. L.-Y. (eds.) Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization. New York: Springer-Verlag , pp. 534–541.