Abstract
Background
Accurate evaluation of the spleen is an important component of staging lymphoma, because this may have prognostic and therapeutic implications.
Purpose
To determine the diagnostic value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (whole-body MRI-DWI) in the detection of splenic involvement in lymphoma.
Material and Methods
This IRB approved, prospective multicenter study included a total of 107 patients with newly diagnosed, histologically proven lymphoma who underwent 1.5 T whole-body MRI-DWI and FDG-PET/CT. Whole-body MRI-DWI and FDG-PET/CT were independently evaluated by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician, in a blinded manner. Splenic involvement at MRI was defined as splenic index > 725 cm3 or discrete nodules. At FDG-PET/CT splenic involvement was defined as splenic uptake greater than liver uptake or hypodense nodules at contrast-enhanced CT. FDG-PET/CT augmented with follow-up imaging after treatment was used as reference standard.
Results
Splenic involvement was detected with FDG-PET/CT in 21 patients, all demonstrating response to treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of whole-body MRI-DWI for the detection of splenic involvement were 85.7 %, 96.5 %, 85.7%, and 96.5%, respectively. Three out of six discrepancies were related to suboptimal criterion of splenic size used with whole-body MRI-DWI versus the size-independent FDG uptake.
Conclusion
Whole-body MRI-DWI is reasonably accurate in the detection of splenic lymphomatous involvement.
Keywords
Introduction
Accurate evaluation of splenic involvement is an important component of lymphoma staging, because this may have prognostic and therapeutic implications (1,2). At staging, the spleen is involved in 30–40% of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (2–4) and in 10–40% of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (5,6). Splenic involvement is considered nodal in Hodgkin's lymphoma and extranodal in NHL. The spleen is the most common single site of infradiaphragmatic disease in Hodgkin's lymphoma and occurs in about 10% of patients diagnosed with thoracic Hodgkin's lymphoma (7). Four patterns of involvement at imaging have been described: splenomegaly; diffuse infiltration with very small nodules (<5 mm); multiple small to large nodules (up to 10 cm); or a large solitary mass (8). Since splenectomy is no longer performed as part of staging, accurate non-invasive diagnosis is required. Previously, staging was predominantly performed with computed tomography (CT) with a reported wide range of diagnostic performances for splenic disease with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 33–94% and 0–100%, respectively (9). More recently, 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) has been recommended for staging of FDG-avid lymphomas (10,11). In FDG-avid lymphomas, splenic uptake greater than hepatic uptake is considered as a relatively reliable indicator of lymphomatous involvement of the spleen (12,13). An important disadvantage of FDG-PET/CT, however, is the exposure of patients to ionizing radiation, which is particularly relevant in children and adolescents. Therefore, there is a growing interest to use whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a radiation-free alternative to FDG-PET/CT for staging lymphoma where accurate assessment of splenic involvement is an essential component. Previous studies have shown an overall moderate to good agreement between whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT for staging lymphoma (14–17). However, to the best of our knowledge, there have not been any large studies that have investigated the value of whole-body MRI for the detection of splenic involvement, as a result of which its value in this setting is still unclear. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with FDG-PET/CT in the detection of splenic involvement in newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Material and Methods
Patients
Patients were selected from a larger cohort of 189 patients who had been included in a prospective multicenter study that investigated the diagnostic value of whole-body MRI in staging lymphoma compared with CT or FDG-PET/CT. Previously reported findings of this prospective study only dealt with the comparison of whole-body MRI with contrast-enhanced CT (18) or only included a limited number of patients with splenic involvement (19). Only patients with complete whole-body MRI-DWI and FDG-PET/CT studies were eligible for inclusion in the current analysis. Six hospitals participated in the enrolment of patients for this analysis; University Medical Centre Utrecht, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Meander Medical Centre Amersfoort, Vall d'Hebron in Barcelona, Instituto Giannina Gaslini in Genoa, and KK Women's and Children's Hospital in Singapore. The local institutional review boards of all participating centers approved this prospective study. All study participants and/or parents or guardians, depending on the age of the participant, gave their written informed consent. Inclusion criteria were age 6 years and older with histologically proven lymphoma and the possibility to perform whole-body MRI-DWI within 15 days of FDG-PET/CT. Exclusion criteria were general contraindications for MRI (including implanted pacemaker and claustrophobia), previous malignancy, patients who were pregnant and patients in whom therapy had already started.
Whole-body MRI protocol
Scan parameters for whole-body MRI-DWI at 1.5T for Philips*, Siemens†, and GE‡.
In two patients b-values of 0, 100, and 800 s/mm2 were used.
SFS, spectral fat saturation; STIR, short inversion time inversion recovery.
FDG-PET/CT protocol
All patients diagnosed with lymphoma underwent a diagnostic 18F-FDG PET/CT as a standard of care. FDG-PET was performed with five different PET systems (Biograph 16 PET-CT or Biograph 40 Truepoint PET-CT, Siemens Medical Solution, Erlangen, Germany; Gemini TOF PET-CT or Allegro, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). Patients fasted for at least 6 h before receiving FDG intravenously. A dose of 2–3.7 MBq/kg body-weight was used. Before injection of FDG, blood glucose levels were checked to exclude hyperglycemia (>11 mmol/L; i.e. >198 mg/dL). Approximately 60 min after FDG injection, PET emission scanning was performed covering the skull base to mid-femur level with the patient in supine position. Prior to PET acquisition, unenhanced CT images were obtained for attenuation correction. Finally, the majority of patients (n = 85) underwent contrast-enhanced CT.
MRI interpretation
Using a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS, Sectra Medical Systems, Linköping, Sweden) a radiologist (RJN with 17 years of MRI experience) independently evaluated the whole-body MRI-DWI using a standardized form. The reader was aware that patients were diagnosed with lymphoma but he was unaware of other imaging findings or clinical information. The whole-body MRI-DWI was reviewed in a locked sequence: the conventional sequences alone (T1W and T2W-STIR) and conventional sequences combined with DWI. Splenic size was assessed and/or focal involvement was recorded. The spleen was considered enlarged if the splenic index exceeded >725 cm3 (splenic index = length × height × thickness at the hilum) as described by others (4,9). For patients <11 years a splenic index >500 + (20 × age [in years]) cm3 was used as proposed by The Paediatric Oncology Group (20). Size of the largest nodule measured at T2W-STIR images and signal characteristics of the focal involvement at conventional and DWI sequences were recorded. The findings at whole-body MRI-DWI were considered positive for involvement if the spleen was either enlarged or contained focal lesion(s). Lesions with signal characteristics similar to cerebral spinal fluid were classified as benign lesions. ADC measurements were not performed as the majority of nodules were less than or equal to 10 mm which approaches to the spatial resolution of DWI (3.5 × 3.5 × 4 mm).
FDG-PET/CT image interpretation
The unenhanced, low-dose FDG-PET/CT images were transferred to DICOM software Osirix (available free online at http://www.osirix-viewer.com) version 3 and evaluated by a nuclear medicine physician (BdK with 9 years of clinical experience). Focal or diffuse splenic uptake, greater than hepatic uptake was considered positive for splenic involvement (12,13). FDG avidity per patient was recorded. Non-FDG-avid lymphoma was defined as clinically proved lymphoma without any site with increased FDG uptake (21). Using a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS, Sectra Medical Systems) another radiologist (FB with 25 years of clinical experience in CT) independently evaluated these datasets using a standardized form. Both splenic nodules and enlargement were recorded. Splenic nodule was defined as a hypodense area compared to the surrounding splenic parenchyma. Findings at FDG-PET and CT were combined to determine splenic disease involvement. Splenic involvement was defined as focal or diffuse splenic uptake greater than liver uptake at FDG-PET or hypodense nodules <1 cm at contrast-enhanced CT (nodular size around or below the spatial resolution of FDG-PET). In case of non-FDG avidity (n = 3), morphological features at contrast-enhanced CT (splenic enlargement > 725 cm3 and/or splenic nodules) were used to determine involvement.
Reference standard
An independent, unblinded expert panel assessed the discrepancies between FDG-PET/CT and whole-body MRI-DWI. This panel consisted of two observers who were not involved with the previous reading sessions (a nuclear medicine physician [MGGH with 12 years of clinical experience with FDG-PET] and a radiologist [AL with 9 years of clinical experience in MRI]). The panel had access to all available concurrent and follow-up investigations, results from bone marrow biopsy and clinical follow-up information at least 6 months after start of initial treatment. Discrepancies between whole-body MRI-DWI and FDG-PET/CT were classified as reader error or intrinsic error. Reader error was defined as being caused by either failure of detection of an abnormality or by an incorrect interpretation of an abnormal finding. Intrinsic error was defined as an error caused by limitations of the imaging acquisition or technique. In all patients follow-up information was reviewed to derive a reference standard. If the initial FDG-PET/CT demonstrated splenic involvement that showed visual decrease of FDG uptake after treatment, these were considered true positive for splenic involvement (n = 21). In case no response was seen, these were considered negative for splenic disease at initial staging (n = 0).
Statistical analysis
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of splenic disease involvement for whole-body MRI-DWI were calculated against the reference standard using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., version 20.0, Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Patients
Characteristics of included patients (n = 107).
HL, Hodgkin's lymphoma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NOS, not otherwise specified; SD, standard deviation.

Flow diagram according to standard of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD).
Derivation of reference standard
In all patients follow-up imaging with FDG-PET/CT (either at early response assessment or after completion of therapy) was available for review, except in three patients. In one patient follow-up imaging was performed with contrast-enhanced CT. Because of initial presentation with only bone marrow biopsy proven disease, one patient was followed with bone marrow biopsies. Another patient who was suspected for primary marginal zone lymphoma of the spleen underwent splenectomy after initial staging. None of these three patients were excluded from the final analysis. Comparison of whole-body MRI-DWI and FDG-PET/CT enhanced with follow-up imaging resulted in seven discrepant cases. At review by our unblinded expert panel, one FDG-PET/CT reader error (interpretation error of focal involvement) and no FDG-PET/CT intrinsic error were identified. Our reference standard for splenic involvement was derived by the original FDG-PET/CT reading enhanced with follow-up information and corrected for FDG-PET/CT reader error. Twenty-one patients exhibited splenic disease involvement, all demonstrating response to treatment.
Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI
Compared to the reference standard, 18 out of 21 patients with splenic involvement were diagnosed at whole-body MRI-DWI (Fig. 2). Whole-body MRI-DWI correctly excluded splenic involvement in 83 out of 86 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for splenic disease with whole-body MRI-DWI was therefore 85.7% (CI, 62.6–96.2%), 96.5% (CI, 89.4–99.1%), 85.7%, and 96.5%, respectively. There was no additional value of DWI in any case during the initial reading. The expert panel assessed the three false positive and three false negative MRI findings to ascribe reader and intrinsic errors (Table 3). In two false negative whole-body MRI-DWI cases, the focal splenic involvement was visible on the original axial b = 1000 s/mm2 diffusion-weighted images, thus labeled as reader errors (Fig. 3). Three errors (one false negative and two false positive cases) were ascribed to intrinsic failure of whole-body MRI-DWI where splenic size criterion is suboptimal compared to the robust functional information obtained with FDG-PET (Fig. 4). One splenic lesion with a size above the detection limit of PET did not show increased FDG uptake and therefore was considered benign according to our predefined criteria of involvement (Fig. 5). Unfortunately, this patient was followed up with only bone marrow biopsies.
Images of a 14-year-old boy with stage IV anaplastic large cell lymphoma illustrate diffuse splenic disease depicted at both FDG-PET and whole-body MRI-DWI. Coronal T2W-STIR (a), coronal gray-scale inverted maximum intensity projection DWI (b), axial DWI (d; b = 1000s/mm2) and axial ADC map (e) show an enlarged spleen (arrows; splenic index of 763 cm3). The impeded diffusion of the spleen is considered a normal finding. Coronal maximum intensity projection FDG-PET (c) illustrates splenic uptake greater than liver uptake. Arrowheads indicate nodal involvement at both sides of the diaphragm. Whole-body MRI-DWI failures. DLBCL, diffusion large B-cell lymphoma; FU, follow-up; NA, not available; PT ID, patient identification. Images of a 28-year-old man (no. 77) with stage III follicular lymphoma grade III illustrate MRI reader error. Coronal T2W-STIR (a) shows a 16-mm large hypointense splenic nodule (arrow). This nodule is hypodense at contrast-enhanced CT (b) with corresponding increased uptake at FDG-PET (e). Both b = 1000 s/mm2 (c) and the ADC map (d) demonstrate low signal within this nodule (arrow). Images of a 76-year-old man (no. 75) with stage III mantle cell lymphoma illustrate the limitations of splenic size measurements at MRI (MRI intrinsic error). Coronal T2W-STIR (a) shows a normal-sized spleen with diffuse increased uptake of FDG (b). Images of an 81-year-old man (no. 27) with stage I small lymphocytic lymphoma illustrate a benign splenic lesion. Coronal T2-STIR (a) shows a 34 mm well-defined hyperintense nodule (arrow) with no impeded diffusion (b = 0 s/mm2 (b); b = 1000 s/mm2 (c); ADC map (d)). The axial FDG-PET (e) demonstrates homogenous normal FDG uptake.



Focal splenic lesions
Focal splenic involvement.
Signal intensity relative to the surrounding splenic parenchyma.
DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Discussion
This study shows that whole-body MRI, including T1W, T2W-STIR, and DWI sequences, is reasonably accurate in the detection of splenic involvement in newly diagnosed lymphoma, although in three out of 21 patients splenic involvement was missed.
In addition, our results showed that most focal splenic lymphomatous lesions exhibit a low T2 signal and low diffusivity compared to the surrounding, normal-appearing spleen. Although low T2 signal intensity in focal splenic involvement has been reported in the literature (22,23), most commonly lymphomatous nodules tend to be isointense to splenic parenchyma on conventional MRI sequences (22,24,25). The different signal intensities detected in lymphomatous nodules probably reflects the varying content of fibrosis, edema and necrosis. The major advantage of detecting low intensity nodules at T2W images is that this may help to distinguish lymphomatous nodules from most benign focal lesions (e.g. hemangioma, hamartoma) (25). Punwani et al. reported an increase in detection rate with the addition of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI compared to T2W images for focal involvement in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma (23). The increasing conspicuity at post- gadolinium images is probably related to the hypovascular nature of the lymphomatous nodules compared to the spleen (22,24,25).
Our measures of diagnostic performance apply for a whole-body MRI-DWI protocol that cannot contain similar dedicated, time-consuming sequences as used in an upper abdomen MRI scan protocol. Our whole-body MRI-DWI protocol will take at least 45 min and additional sequences for the upper abdomen to the current protocol are therefore practically impossible. However, several technical improvements may increase the diagnostic yield of whole-body MRI in the detection of lymphomatous splenic involvement. First, the consistent use of (whole-body) surface coil for signal reception – whether or not combined with acquisition at higher main field strength (3 T) – will increase the received signal to noise ratio and/or spatial resolution. Second, newly developed respiratory motion compensation techniques may decrease motion artifacts during free breathing without increasing acquisition time (26). However, three out of six discrepancies between whole-body MRI-DWI and our reference standard were due to the suboptimal criterion of splenic size used with MRI versus the size-independent functional information provided by FDG-PET. The problem of using size for splenic assessment has previously been reported (8,27); mildly-moderately enlarged spleens can be without lymphomatous infiltration and normal-sized spleens can have diffuse infiltration. Rini et al. (27) compared FDG-PET with contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of the spleen in staging of lymphoma in seven patients and used histopathology as reference standard. The reported diagnostic accuracies of FDG-PET and CT were 100% and 57%, respectively. In this study, two patients with enlarged spleens (both > 725 cm3) did not contain lymphomatous infiltration. New functional MRI tools, e.g. by using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agents, may further increase the diagnostic yield of whole-body MRI in this setting (28). Unfortunately, clinical implementation of USPIO agents is impeded due to lack of their availability.
Several study limitations need to be addressed. First, there was a lack of histopathological reference standard in all except one patient. Although the diagnosis of lymphoma was histologically confirmed in each patient, histological investigation of the spleen is no longer part of standard care. Second, there was heterogeneity of our image quality related to our multicentre design of our study. On the other hand, this reflects daily clinical practice and increases the generalizability of our results. Third, we assessed the splenic involvement for all types of lymphoma although splenic involvement is especially relevant in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Fourth, although we included over 100 patients, we acknowledge that the group with splenic involvement is relatively limited.
In conclusion, our results indicate that whole-body MRI-DWI is reasonable accurate in detecting splenic involvement in lymphoma. Performing whole-body MRI at higher field strength, applying more sophisticated respiratory motion compensation and using new functional MRI techniques may further improve the focal splenic detection, although the diffuse lymphomatous infiltration in normal sized spleens will remain a diagnostic challenge.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Willem PThM Mali, MD, PhD and Hugo J Adams, MD for their contribution to this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Funding
This work was supported by the Dutch Organisation of Health Research and Development (ZonMw) Program for Health Care Efficiency Research (grant no. 80-82310-98-08012) and Kinderen Kankervrij (Children cancer free; project number 87). Data collection, data analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the paper and the decision to submit were left to theauthors' discretion and were not influenced by ZonMw orKIKA.
