Bijker (2001) Wiebe E. Bijker, The Need for Critical Intellectuals: A Space for STS , Plenary Address, Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) Annual Meeting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
2.
Clayton (2002) Richard Clayton, `Tale of Leaky Data, Bugs, and Spooks'. Review of MacKenzie (2001) . The Times Higher Education Supplement (21 June): 35 .
3.
Cole (1998) Simon Cole, `Witnessing Identification: Latent Fingerprint Evidence and Expert Knowledge' , Social Studies of Science28(5/6): 687-712 .
4.
Edge (1997) David Edge, `Another Banal Utterance?' , Presidential address, Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) Annual Meeting, Tucson, AZ, USA.
5.
Faigman (2002) David L. Faigman, `Is Science Different for Lawyers?' , Science297 (19 July): 339-340 .
6.
Faigman et al. (2002) David L. Faigman, David Kaye, Michael Saks and Joseph Sanders, Science in the Law: Forensic Science Issues ( St Paul, MN: West Group ).
7.
Hogg et al. (2002) Clare Dwyer Hogg, Clare Rudbeck and Tom Phillips, Interviews of Richard Dawkins and other `Leading Figures', for `September 11, One Year On: A Special Report' , The Independent (11 September).
8.
Jasanoff (1992) Sheila Jasanoff, `What Judges Should Know about the Sociology of Science' , Jurimetrics Journal32: 345-359 .
9.
MacKenzie (2001) Donald MacKenzie, Mechanizing Proof: Computing, Risk, and Trust ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ).
10.
Published as `A Technological World We Can Live In' , Technology and Culture43/1 (January 2002): 222-226 .
11.
Williams (2002b) Rowan Williams, Writing in the Dust: Reflections on 11th September and Its Aftermath ( London: Hodder & Stoughton ).
