An idiographic procedure designed to assess the belief systems of criminal offenders is described, investigated, and clarified. This measure, the Cognitive Map of Major Belief Systems (CMMBS), assesses the five belief systems (self-view, world-view, past-view, present-view, future-view) held to occupy the higher echelons of human cognition. Modest to moderate test-retest reliability was achieved when 19 inmates, enrolled in one of three drug-counseling groups, completed the CMMBS on two separate occasions, 2 weeks apart. It was also ascertained that the drug treatment specialist who served as therapist for all three groups “blindly” matched the 19 CMMBS records to the inmates who produced them. A case study of one of the 19 participants was used to illustrate how the CMMBS is employed with individual offenders and how belief systems interact with major schematic subnetworks such as attributions, outcome expectancies, efficacy expectancies, goals, values, and thinking styles to create crime-supporting lifestyles.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
2.
Bagozzi, R. P., Bergami, M., & Leone, L. (2003). Hierarchical representation of motives in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 915-943.
3.
Elliott, W. N., Fakouri, M. E., & Hafner, J. L. (1993). Early recollections of criminal offenders. Individual Psychology, 49, 68-75.
4.
Evans, C. D. H., Hughes, J., & Houston, J. (2002). Significance-testing the validity of idiographic methods: A little derangement goes a long way. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55, 385-390.
5.
Faith, M., & Thayer, J. F. (2001). A dynamical systems interpretation of a dimensional model of emotion. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 121-133.
6.
Festinger, L. A. (1957). Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). Unhappy self-esteem: A meaningful exception to the rule. Journal of Psychology, 126, 555-570.
8.
Highhouse, S. (2002). Assessing the candidate as a whole: A historical and critical analysis of individual psychological assessment for personnel decision making. Personnel Psychology, 55, 363-396.
9.
Hogue, T. E. (1994). Goal attainment scaling: A measure of clinical impact and risk assessment. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 21, 96-102.
10.
Jaccard, J., & Dittus, P. (1990). Idiographic and nomothetic perspectives on research methods and data analysis. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 312-351.
11.
Jankowski, M. S. (1991). Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Norton.
13.
Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, M. S. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443-453.
14.
Magaletta, P. R., Jackson, K. L., Miller, N. A., & Innes, C. A. (2004). Levels of attribution and change in a high-security correctional population. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39, 1-18.
15.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157-166.
17.
Norcross, J. C., Prochaska, J. O., Guadagnoli, E., & DiClemente, C. C. (1984). Factor structure of the Levels of Attribution and Change (LAC) scale in samples of psychotherapists and smokers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 519-528.
18.
Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. (1990). Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 712-725.
19.
Shadel, W. G., Niaura, R., & Abrams, D. B. (2000). An idiographic approach to understanding personality structure and individual differences among smokers. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 345-359.
20.
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C. (1994). Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 674-687.
21.
Vidal, F. (2003). Contextual biography and the evolving systems approach to creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 73-82.
22.
Walters, G. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307-325.
23.
Walters, G. D. (1998). Changing lives of crime and drugs: Intervening with substance-abusing offenders. Chicester, UK: Wiley.
24.
Walters, G. D. (2002). Criminal belief systems: An integrated-interactive theory of lifestyles. Westport, CT: Praeger.
25.
Walters, G. D. (2003). Development of a self-report measure of outcome expectancies for crime. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 37, 1-10.
26.
Walters, G. D. (2004). Changes in positive and negative crime expectancies in inmates exposed to a brief psychoeducational intervention: Further data. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 505-512.
27.
Walters, G. D., White, T. W., & Denney, D. (1991). The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form: Preliminary data. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 406-418.
