Meta-analyses have suggested that sexual offender treatment (SOT) completion is associated with lowered sexual recidivism rates for convicted sexual offenders. The paucity of properly designed studies allows for the alternative explanation of less recidivism among treated samples as reflecting that lower risk offenders disproportionately self-select into treatment. A test of the “self-selection explanation” can occur by investigating treatment effect on known high-risk offenders. Psychopathy correlates with increased sexual recidivism risk, such that an exploration of the SOT effect on psychopathic offenders could clarify the accuracy of the self-selection hypothesis. Additionally, the debated degree to which psychopaths are treatable might obtain clarification by a research review. This article examines empirical findings concerning the effectiveness of SOT for psychopathic sexual offenders. Ten studies were found to meet the minimal quality standards used, stemming from only four data sources. Shortcomings of existing research precluded clear conclusions, though trends in the data are delineated.
Abracen, J., Looman, J., Mailloux, D., Serin, R., Harkins, L., & Malcolm, P.B. (2004). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched comparison subjects. Unpublished manuscript.
2.
Alexander, M. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101-116.
3.
Barbaree, H.E. (2005). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and recidivism: An extended follow-up to Seto and Barbaree. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(9), 1115-1131.
4.
Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E. (2006). Sexual offender treatment for psychopaths: Is it harmful? In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, L. E. Marshall , & G. A. Serran (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment: Controversial issues. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
5.
Doren, D.M. (1987). Understanding and treating the psychopath. New York: John Wiley.
6.
D'Silva, K., Duggan, C., & McCarthy, L. (2004). Does treatment really make psychopaths? A review of the evidence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(2), 163-177.
7.
Furby, L., Weinrott, M.R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 3-30.
8.
Gallagher, C.A., Wilson, D.B., Hirschfield, P., Coggeshall, M.B., & MacKenzie, D.L. (1999). A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Psychological Management Quarterly, 3, 19-29.
9.
Hall, G.C.N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 63, 802-809.
10.
Hanson, R.K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved from http://ww2.ps-sp.gc.ca/publications/corrections/199704_e.pdf
11.
Hanson, R.K., Broom, I., & Stephenson, M. (2004). Evaluating community sex offender treatment programs: A 12-year follow-up of 724 offenders. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36(2), 85-94.
12.
Hanson, R.K., Gordon, A., Harris, A.J.R., Marques, J.K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V.L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Treatment and Research, 14(2), 169-194.
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Retrieved from http://ww2.ps-sp.gc.ca/publications/corrections/200402_e.asp
14.
Hare, R.D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M.E. (2006). Treatment of psychopathy: A review of empirical findings. In C. Patrick (Ed.), The handbook of psychopathy (pp. 555-572). New York: Guilford.
17.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumière, M., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 413-425.
18.
Hildebrand, M., deRuiter, C., & deVogel, V. (2004). Psychopathy and sexual deviance in rapists: Association with sexual and nonsexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(1), 1-24.
19.
Langton, C.M. (2003). Contrasting approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders: An evaluation of recidivism prediction schemes and the utility of supplementary clinical information for enhancing predictive accuracy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
20.
Langton, C.M., Barbaree, H.E., Harkins, L., & Peacock, E.J. (2006). Sex offenders' response to treatment and its association with recidivism as a function of psychopathy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(1), 99-120.
21.
Looman, J. (2006). Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(2), 193-206.
22.
Looman, J., & Abracen, J. (2006, September). Psychopathy subtypes, treatment performance and recidivism. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Chicago.
23.
Looman, J., Abracen, J., Serin, R., & Marquis, P. (2005). Psychopathy, treatment change, and recidivism in high-risk, high-need sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 549-568.
24.
Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology , 1, 117-146.
25.
Marshall, W.L., & Yates, P.M. (2005). Comment on Mailloux et al.'s (2003) dosage study . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 221-224.
26.
McGrath, R.J., Cumming, G., Livingston, J.A., & Hoke, S.E. (2003). Outcome of a treatment program for adult sex offenders: From prison to community. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 18, 3-17.
27.
Olver, M., & Wong, S. (2006). Psychopathy, sexual deviance, and recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(1), 65-82.
28.
Olver, M.E. (2003). The development and validation of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version (VRS:SO) and its relationship to psychopathy and treatment attrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
29.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the violence risk appraisal guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21(2), 231-241.
30.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (2003). What we know and don't know about treating sex offenders. In B. J. Winick & J. Q. LaFond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 101-117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
31.
Salekin, R.T. (2002). Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism. Clinical lore or clinical reality? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 79-112.
32.
Seto, M.C., & Barbaree, H.E. (1999). Psychopathy, treatment behavior and sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), 1235-1248.
33.
Skeem, J.L., Monahan, J., & Mulvey, E.P. (2002). Psychopathy, treatment involvement, and subsequent violence among civil psychiatric patients. Law and Human Behavior , 26(6), 577-603.
