In mainstream offender samples, several risk assessments have been evaluated for predictive validity. This study extends this work to male offenders with intellectual disabilities. Participants from high-, medium-, and low-security settings, as well as community settings, were compared on a range of risk assessments. The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, HCR-20—Historical Scale, the Risk Matrix 2000-C (combined risk), and the Emotional Problems Scales—Internalising discriminated between groups, with participants from high security having higher scores than those in medium security, who had higher scores than those in the community. The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, all HCR-20 scales, the Short Dynamic Risk Scale, and the Emotional Problems Scales (Internalising and Externalising) showed significant areas under the curve for the prediction of violence. The Static-99 showed a significant area under the curve for the prediction of sexual incidents. The discussion reviews the value of these various scales to intellectual disability services.
Banks, S., Robbins, P.C., Silver, E., Besselinov, R., Steadman, H.J., Monahan, J., et al. (2004). A multiple-models approach to violence risk assessment among people with mental disorder. Criminal Justice &Behaviour, 31, 324-340.
2.
Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E.J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice & Behaviour, 28, 490-521.
3.
Bartosh, D.L., Garby, T., Lewis, D., & Gray, S. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 422-438.
4.
Boer, D.P., Hart, S.D., Kropp, P.R., & Webster, C.D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk—20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: BC Institute Against Family Violence andMental Health.
5.
Boer, D.P., Tough, S., & Haaven, J. (2004). Assessment of risk manageability of developmentally disabled sex offenders. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 275-284.
6.
Butwell, M., Jamieson, E., Leese, M., & Taylor, P. (2000). Trends in special (high security) hospitals: 2: Residency and discharge episodes, 1986—1995. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 260-265.
7.
Cooke, D.J., Michie, S., & Ryan, J. (2002). Evaluating risk for violence: A preliminary study of the HCR-20, PCL-R and VRAG on a Scottish prison population. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Prison Service.
8.
Craig, L.A., Browne, K.D., & Stringer, I. (2004). Comparing sex offender risk assessment measures on a UK sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 7-27.
9.
Day, K. (1994). Male mentally handicapped sex offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 630-639.
10.
Epperson, D.L., Kaul, J.D., & Hesselton, D. (1998, October). Final report on the development of the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool—Revised (MnSOST-R). Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
11.
Grisso, T., Malamuth, N.M., Barbaree, H., Quinsey, V., & Knight, R. (2003). Risk assessment: Discussion of the section. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 236-246.
12.
Hanson, R.K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offence recidivism (User Report No. 1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 27, 6-35.
14.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report No. 1999-02). Ottawa, Ontario , Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada .
15.
Hare, R.D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi HealthSystems.
16.
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M.E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. Sexually coercive behaviour: Understanding and management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 198-210.
17.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Quinsey, V.L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 20, 315-335.
18.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumiere, M.L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
19.
Hogue, T., Steptoe, L., Taylor, J., Lindsay, W.R., Mooney, P., Pinkney, L., et al. (2006). A comparison of offenders with intellectual disability across three levels of security. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 16, 13-28.
20.
Holland, A.T. (2004). Criminal behaviour and developmental disability: An epidemiological perspective. In W. R. Lindsey , J. L. Taylor, & P. Sturmey (Eds.), Offenders with developmental disabilities (pp. 23-34). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
21.
Kroner, D.G., & Mills, J.F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 28, 471-489.
22.
Lindsay, W.R., & Beail, N. (2004). Risk assessment: Actuarial prediction and clinical judgement of offending incidents and behaviour for intellectual disability services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities , 17, 229-234.
23.
Lindsay, W.R., Smith, A.H.W., Law, J., Quinn, K., Anderson, A., Smith, A., et al. (2004). Sexual and non-sexual offenders with intellectual and learning disabilities: A comparison of characteristics, referral patterns and outcome. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 875-890.
24.
Lindsay, W.R., Steele, L., Smith, A.H.W., Quinn, K., & Allan, R. (2006). A community forensic intellectual disability service: Twelve year follow-up of referrals, analysis of referral patterns and assessment of harm reduction. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 113-130.
25.
Lindsay, W.R., & Taylor, J.L. (2005). A selective review of research on offenders with developmental disabilities: Assessment and treatment. Clinical Psychology andPsychotherapy, 12, 201-214.
26.
McMillan, D., Hastings, R., & Coldwell, J. (2004). Clinical and actuarial prediction of physical violence in a forensic intellectual disability hospital: A longitudinal study . Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities , 17, 255-266.
27.
Monahan, J. (2002). The MacArthur studies of violence risk. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, S67-S72.
28.
Novaco, R.W., & Taylor, J.L. (2004). Assessment of anger and aggression in offenders with developmental disabilities. Psychological Assessment , 16, 42-50.
Quinsey, V.L. (2004). Risk assessment and management in community settings . In W. R. Lindsay, J. L. Taylor, & P. Sturmey (Eds.), Offenders with developmental disabilities (pp. 131-142). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
31.
Quinsey, V.L., Book, A., & Skilling, T.A. (2004). A follow-up of deinstitutionalised developmentally handicapped men with histories of antisocial behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 243-254.
32.
Quinsey, V.L., Coleman, G., Jones, B., & Altrows, J. (1997). Proximal antecedents of eloping and re-offending among supervised mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 794-813.
Sjostedt, G., & Langstrom, N. (2002). Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A comparison of four different measures. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 25-40.
35.
Taylor, J.L., Novaco, R.W., Gillmer, B.T., Robertson, A., & Thorne, I. (2005). Individual cognitive behavioural anger treatment for people with mild-borderline intellectual disabilities and histories of aggression: A controlled trial. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 367-382.
36.
Taylor, J.L., Novaco, R.W., Gillmer, B., & Thorne, I. (2002). Cognitive behavioural treatment of anger intensity among offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 151-165.
37.
Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., et al. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225-235.
38.
Tough, S. (2001). Validation of two standard assessments (RRASOR, 1997; Static-99, 1999) on a sample of adult males who are intellectually disabled with significant cognitive deficits. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
39.
Webster, C.D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K.S., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University and British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.
