In this study, Hirschi's social bonding theory is employed to identify what aspects of the theory can explain male and female delinquency and whether social bonding variables can equally explain male and female delinquency (generalizability problem) in a developing society, Turkey. The data include a two-stage-stratified cluster sample of 1,710 high school students from the central districts of Ankara, the capital of Turkey. The findings suggest that social bonding variables play a more important role for male students than for female students. Furthermore, they indicate that components of the social bonding theory can equally explain both male and female delinquent acts.
Anderson, J.B., Holmes, M.D., & Ostresh, E. (1999). Male and female delinquents' attachments and effects of attachments on severity of self-reported delinquency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 435-452.
2.
Bastug, S. (2002). Household and family in contemporary Turkey: An historical perspective. In R. Liljestrom & E. Ozdalga (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in the family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 99-115). London: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul .
3.
Cernkovich, A.S., & Giordano, P.C. (1992). School bonding, race, and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 261-292.
4.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R.G. (1998). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
Delikara, E.İ. (2002). Ergenlerin akran ilişkileri ile suç kabül edilen davranışlar arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Examination of the relationship between adolescents' peer relations and criminal behaviors]. In I. ulusal çocuk ve suç: Nedenler ve önleme çalışmaları sempozyumu bildirileri [The first national child and crime: Proceedings of symposium on reasons and prevention efforts] (pp. 147-160). Ankara: Türkiye Çocuklara Yeniden Özğürlük Vakfı .
7.
Dukes, L.R., & Stein, A.J. (2001). Effects of assets and deficits on the social control of at-risks behavior among youth: A structural equations approach. Youth & Society, 32, 337-359.
8.
Elliott, S.D., & Ageton, S.S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 45, 95-110.
9.
Furstenberg, F.F. (2000). The sociology of adolescents and youth in the 1990s: A critical comment. Journal of Marriage and Family , 62, 896-910.
10.
Gardner, L., & Shoemaker, D.J. (1989). Social bonding and delinquency: A comparative analysis. Sociological Quarterly, 30, 481-500.
11.
Hagan, J., Gillis, A.R., & Simpson, J. (1985). The class structure of gender and delinquency: Toward a power-control theory of common delinquent behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1151-1178.
12.
Hartjen, A.C., & Kethineni, S. (1999). Exploring the etiology of delinquency across country and gender. Journal of Crime and Justice, 22, 55-90.
13.
Hartjen, A.C., & Priyadarsini, S. (2003). Gender, peers, and delinquency: A study of boys and girls in rural France. Youth & Society , 34, 387-414.
14.
Heidensohn, F. (1994). Gender and crime. In M. Maguire, R. Reiner, & R. Morgan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 491-530). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
15.
Heimer, K. (1996). Gender, interaction, and delinquency: Testing a theory of differential social control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 39-61.
16.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley : University of California Press.
17.
Huebner, J.A., & Betts, C.S. (2002). Exploring the utility of social control theory for youth development: Issues of attachment, involvement, and gender. Youth & Society, 34, 123-145.
18.
Junger, M., & Marshall, I.H. (1997). The interethnic generalizability of social control theory: An empirical test. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 79-112.
19.
Junger-Tas, J., Terlouw, G., & Klein, W.M. (1994). Delinquent behavior among young people in the Western world: First results of the international self-report delinquency study. Amsterdam: Kugler.
20.
Kagitcibasi, C. (2002). Cross-cultural perspectives on family change. In R. Liljestrom & E. Ozdalga (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in the family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 19-38). London: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.
21.
Kagitcibasi, C., & Sunar, D. (1992). Family and socialization in Turkey. In J. L. Roopnarine & D. B. Carter (Eds.), Parent-child socialization in diverse cultures: Annual advances in applied developmental psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 75-88). Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
22.
Kaner, S. (2002). Anababa denetimleriyle ergenlerin suç kabül edilen davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examination of the relationships between family control and juvenile delinquency] . In I. ulusal çocuk ve suç: Nedenler ve önleme çalışmaları sempozyumu bildirileri [The first national child and crime: Proceedings of symposium on reasons and prevention efforts] (pp. 229-250). Ankara: Türkiye Çocuklara Yeniden Özğürlük Vakfı .
23.
Lanctot, N., & LeBlanc, M. (2002). Explaining adolescent females' involvement in deviance. Crime and Justice, 29, 113-202.
24.
Li, D.S. (1999). Social control, delinquency, and youth status achievement: A developmental approach. Sociological Perspectives , 42, 305-324.
25.
Liu, X., & Kaplan, H.B. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in adolescent delinquent behaviour: A longitudinal test of mediating mechanisms. Criminology, 37, 195-215.
26.
Naffine, N. (1996). Feminism and criminology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
Özbay, Ö. (2003). Merton's strain theory: Evidence from the high school in Ankara. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27, 59-76. Available at www.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/edergi
28.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 4, 859-866.
29.
Rosenbaum, J.L. (1987). Social control, gender, and delinquency: An analysis of drug, property and violent offenders. Justice Quarterly , 4, 117-132.
30.
Rosenbaum, J.L., & Lasley, J.R. (1990). School, community context, and delinquency: Rethinking the gender gap. Justice Quarterly, 7, 493-513.
31.
Shoemaker, J.D. (1994). Male-female delinquency in the Philippines: A comparative analysis. Youth & Society, 25, 299-329.
32.
Smith, A.D., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140-172.
33.
Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.
34.
Sunar, D. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family. In R. Liljestrom & E. Ozdalga (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in the family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 217-237). London: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.
35.
Sunar, D., & Fisek, G.O. (2004). Contemporary Turkish families. In U. Gielen & J. Roopnarine (Eds.), Families in global perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
Taylor, D.R., & Oskay, G. (1995). Identity formation in Turkish and American late adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 8-22.
37.
Torstensson, M. (1990). Female delinquents in a birth cohort: Tests of some aspects of control theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 6, 101-115.
38.
Warr, M. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17-40.
39.
Wiatrowski, M., Griswold, D.B., & Roberts, M.K. (1981). Social control theory and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 46, 525-541.
40.
Yildirim, A. (1997). Gender role influences on Turkish adolescents' self-identity. Adolescence, 32, 217-231.
