This study investigates the cognitive changes for female detainees participating in a chemical dependency program that relies on cognitive behavioral therapy to help participants understand their addiction from biological, cognitive, and social perspectives. We examined how in-detention treatment perceptions of self and social connectedness. Qualitative data, collected through essays written by participants pre-treatment and upon release from detention, suggest that the program promotes many of the cognitive changes associated with desistance described by extant theoretical models, including the Identity Theory of Desistance (ITD). Our findings expand our understanding of the identity-desistance link by demonstrating that cognitive changes can occur during detention while women simultaneously experience the “pains of imprisonment.” We discuss the implications of our findings for both practice and policy.
AdlerA. (1946). The practice and theory of individual psychology. Kegan Paul.
2.
BachmanR.KerrisonE.PaternosterR.O’ConnellD.SmithL. (2016). Desistance for a long-term drug-involved sample of adult offenders: The importance of identity transformation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815604012
3.
BeatonB.GerberJ. (2025). Drug addiction and incarceration: a call for research and transparency among prison-based substance abuse treatment programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 69, 1191–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x231176003
4.
BelknapJ. (2015). Activist Criminology: Criminologists’ responsibility to advocate for social and legal justice. Criminology, 53(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12063
5.
BergenN.LabontéR. (2020). “Everything is Perfect, and we have no problems”: Detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 30(5), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354
6.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D.RiveraC. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427805280068
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-000
10.
BrownM.BloomB. (2009). Reentry and renegotiating motherhood: Maternal identity and success on parole. Crime & Delinquency, 55(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708330627
11.
BurkeP. J.StetsJ. E. (2023). Identity theory. Oxford University Press.
12.
CarsonE. A.KluckowR. (2023). Correctional populations in the United States, 2021 – Statistical tables. U.S. Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
ColmanC.Vander LaenenF. (2017). The desistance process of offenders who misuse drugs. In HartE. L.van GinnekenE. F. J. C. (Eds.), New perspectives on desistance: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 61–84). Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
DeBeckK.KerrT.LiK.MilloyM.-J.MontanerJ.WoodE. (2009). Incarceration and drug use patterns among a cohort of injection drug users. Addiction, 104(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02387.x
16.
DodgeK.PotockyM. (2000). Female substance abuse characteristics and correlates in a sample of inpatient clients. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-5472(99)00017-3
17.
DolanK.KhoeiE. M.BrentariC.StevensA. (2007). Prisons and drugs: A global review of incarceration, drug use and drug services. The Beckley Foundation.
18.
DuroseM. R.CooperA. D.SnyderH. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
19.
GiordanoP.CernkovichS.RudolphJ. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064. https://doi.org/10.1086/343191
20.
GrimmP. (2010). Social desirability bias. In ShethJ.MalhotraN. (Eds.), Wiley International encyclopedia of marketing: Vol. 2 marketing research. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057
21.
GrossoehmeD.LipsteinE. (2016). Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: The application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1954-1
22.
HartE. L. (2017). Women prisoners and the drive for desistance: Capital and responsibilization as a barrier to change. Women & Criminal Justice, 27(3), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2016.1217814
23.
HaseltineF. P. (2000). Gender differences in addiction and recovery. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 9(6), 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/15246090050118080
24.
HeimerK.MaloneS. E.De CosterS. (2023). Trends in women’s incarceration rates in US prisons and jails: A tale of inequalities. Annual Review of Criminology, 6(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-041559
25.
HoneywellD. (2019). Components of identity transformations within the desistance process. In BestD.ColmanC. (Eds.), Strengths-based approaches to crime and substance use: From drugs and crime to desistance and recovery (pp. 123–139). Routledge.
26.
HoskinsK. M.CobbinaJ. E. (2019). It depends on the situation: Women’s identity transformation in prison, jail, and substance abuse treatment settings. Feminist Criminology, 15(3), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085119878268
27.
KazemianL. (2012). Pushing back the frontiers of knowledge on desistance from crime. In LoeberR.WelshB. C. (Eds.), The future of criminology (pp. 134–140). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199917938.003.0017
28.
KingR. S.MauerM.YoungM. C. (2005). Incarceration and crime: A complex relationship. The Sentencing Project.
29.
KyckelhahnT.CooperT. (2017). The past predicts the future: Criminal history and recidivism of federal offender. United States Sentencing Commission.
LawF. M.GuoG. J. (2012). Hope and recovery from substance abuse for female drug offenders in Taiwan. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(8), 1258–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11426418
33.
LiuL.BachmanR. (2021). Self-identity and persistent offending: A quantitative test of identity theory of desistance. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 60(5), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2021.1931623
34.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.
35.
MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (2004). After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Routledge.
36.
McAdamsD. P. (2021). Narrative identity and the life story. In O. P. John & R. W. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed., pp. 122–141). The Guilford Press.
37.
Miller-RoenigkB.PeteetB.Stevens-WatkinsD.StatonM. (2025). Correlates of six-month recidivism among rural incarcerated women. Women & Criminal Justice, 35, 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2023.2167061
MorashM.AdamsE. A.GoodsonM. V.CobbinaJ. E. (2020). Prison experiences and identity in women’s life stories: Implications for reentry. In LeverentzA.ChenE. Y.ChristianJ. (Eds.), Beyond recidivism: New approaches to research on prisoner reentry and reintegration (pp. 151–171). NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479862726.003.0008
40.
MorashM.StoneR.HoskinsK.KashyD. A.CobbinaJ. E. (2020). Narrative identity development and desistance from illegal behavior among substance-using female offenders: Implications for narrative therapy and creating opportunity. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 83(1–2), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01090-4
41.
MyerA. J.BuchholzM. M. (2018). Examining the impact of a gender-specific drug court on recidivism. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2016.1246260
42.
NaC.PaternosterR.BachmanR. (2015). Within-individual change in arrests in a sample of serious offenders: The role of identity. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(4), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0017-y
43.
Nelson-ZlupkoL.KauffmanE.DoreM. M. (1995). Gender differences in drug addiction and treatment: Implications for social work intervention with substance-abusing women. Social Work, 40(1), 45–54.
44.
OlsonD. E.LorettaJ. S.EscobarG. (2016). Comparing male and female prison releasees across risk factors and postprison recidivism. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1083930
45.
OpsalT. (2012). ‘Livin’ on the straights’: Identity, desistance, and work among women post-incarceration. Sociological Inquiry, 82(3), 378–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.2012.00421.x
46.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward and identity theory of criminal desistance. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156.
47.
PetrichD. M. (2016). Theorising desistance-promotion in circle processes: The role of community in identity transformation. Restorative Justice, 4(3), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2016.1245905
48.
RhoadesK. A.LeveL. D.EddyJ. M.ChamberlainP. (2016). Predicting the transition from juvenile delinquency to adult criminality: Gender-specific influences in two high-risk samples. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 26(5), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1957
49.
Rowan-SzalG. A.JoeG. W.SimpsonD. D.GreenerJ. M.VanceJ. (2009). During-treatment outcomes among female methamphetamine-using offenders in prison-based treatments. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(5), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670902979496
50.
RumgayJ. (2004). Scripts for safer survival: Pathways out of female crime. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 405–419.
StoneR. (2016). Desistance and identity repair: Redemption narratives as resistance to stigma: Table 1. British Journal of Criminology, 56(5), 956–975. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv081
55.
StoneR.MorashM.GoodsonM.SmithS.CobbinaJ. (2018). Women on parole, identity processes, and primary desistance. Feminist Criminology, 13(4), 382–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116670004
56.
SuddabyR. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.
57.
SweeneyT. J. (Ed.). (2009). Adlerian counseling and psychotherapy. A practitioner‘s approach (5th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
58.
TurnerE. (2017). ‘I want to be a dad to him, i don’t just want to be someone he comes and sees in prison’: Fatherhood’s potential for desistance. In HartE. L.van GinnekenE. F. J. C. (Eds.), New perspectives on desistance: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 37–59). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95185-7_3
59.
WrightS. (2017). Narratives of punishment and frustrated desistance in the lives of repeatedly criminalised women. In HartE. L.van GinnekenE. F. J. C. (Eds.), New perspectives on desistance: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 11–35). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95185-7_2
