Trapped in trash: ‘Modes of governing’ and barriers to transitioning to sustainable waste management

Abstract

The disposal of municipal solid waste can be costly and environmentally destructive. This article asks why, given many alternatives, most waste material is still disposed of in landfills or incinerators. Building upon the ‘modes of governing’ framework proposed by Bulkeley, Watson, and Hudson as a means of identifying and interpreting the relationships among the many actors and artefacts that constitute a municipal solid waste management system, this article explores the barriers to transitioning between modes. The case of solid waste management in Boston, Massachusetts illustrates how key factors – limited enforcement of existing policy, institutional and physical fragmentation, financial incentives, and the vested interests of the private sector – protect the disposal mode of governing. Meanwhile, the actors most interested in moving towards more sustainable waste management techniques lack access to decision-making processes and daily operations, limiting their ability to influence policy and practice. The analysis of barriers suggests an alternative way of classifying modes – dominant, incremental, visionary, and aspirational – that explicitly captures the relative entrenchment of each mode, while also opening up the framework for application in other geographies, and for other systems that may or may not share similar governmental rationalities, technologies, or capacities.

Keywords

Modes of governing waste management entrenchment environmental governance Boston Massachusetts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

(1996) Why Do We Recycle? Markets, Values, and Public Policy, Washington, DC: Island Press.

Adugu

(2014) Boycott and buycott as emerging modes of civic engagement. International Journal of Civic Engagement and Social Change 1(3): 43–58.

Bakker

Kooy

Shofiani

et al. (2008) Governance failure: Rethinking the institutional dimensions of urban water supply to poor households. World Development 36(10): 1891–1915.

Ben-Joseph

(2005) The Code of the City: Standards and the Hidden Language of Place Making, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ben-Joseph E, Pollans LB, Plovnick A, et al. (2016) Solid Waste Management and Sustainable Consumption: A Survey About Municipal Practices in the U.S. On file with author.

Boston Recycling Coalition (2014) Don’t waste this opportunity. Report, Boston Recycling Coalition, Boston, MA, March. Available at: http://www.cleanwateraction.org/files/ZWTF%20recommendations.pdf (accessed 1 June 2017).

Boyle

(2002) Cleaning up after the Celtic tiger: ‘Scalar fixes’ in the political ecology of tiger economies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27(2): 172–194.

Bulkeley

Gregson

(2009) Crossing the threshold: Municipal waste policy and household waste generation. Environment and Planning A 41(4): 929–945.

Bulkeley

Watson

Hudson

(2007) Modes of governing municipal waste. Environment and Planning A 39(11): 2733–2753.

10.

Bulkeley

Watson

Hudson

et al. (2005) Governing municipal waste: Towards a new analytical framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(1): 1–23.

11.

Carroll M (2008) Recycling becomes cash cow: New systems gain popularity, profits. Boston Globe, 11 September, 1.

12.

Chatzis

(1999) Designing and operating storm water drain systems: Empirical findings and conceptual developments. In: Coutard

(ed.) The Governance of Large Technical Systems, London: Routledge, pp. 73–90.

13.

Citizens Budget Commission (2015) A better way to pay for solid waste management. Report, Citizens Budget Commission, New York City. Available at: https://cbcny.org/research/better-way-pay-solid-waste-management (accessed 28 June 2017).

14.

City of Boston (2009) Mayor’s performance report: Boston public works and transportation departments. Report, City of Boston Performance Management System, Boston. Available at: https://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/PWD-BTD_BAR%20FY10%20Q2_tcm3-17783.pdf (accessed 1 June 2017).

15.

City of Boston (2011) Public works and transportation quarterly performance report. Report, City of Boston Performance Management System, Boston. Available at: http://www.cityofboston.gov/images_documents/PWD-BTD%20FY11%20Q3%20Web_ver1_tcm3-25820.pdf (accessed 1 June 2017).

16.

Clapp

Swanston

(2009) Doing away with plastic shopping bags: International patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environmental Politics 18(3): 315–332.

17.

Corvellec

Campos

MJZ

Zapata

(2013) Infrastructures, lock-in, and sustainable urban development: The case of waste incineration in the Göteborg Metropolitan area. Journal of Cleaner Production 50: 32–39.

18.

Costanza

Daly

(1987) Ecological economics toward an ecological economics. Ecological Modelling 38(1): 1–7.

19.

Daly

(2002) Reconciling the economics of social equity and environmental sustainability. Population and the Environment 24(1): 24–47.

20.

Davies

(2005) Incineration politics and the geographies of waste governance: A burning issue for Ireland? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23: 357–397.

21.

Davies

(2008) The Geographies of Garbage Governance: Interventions, Interactions, and Outcomes, Aldershot: Ashgate.

22.

Davoudi

(2000) Planning for waste management: Changing discourses and institutional relationships. Progress in Planning 53(3): 165–216.

23.

Davoudi

(2009) Scalar tensions in the governance of waste: The resilience of state spatial Keynesianism. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52(2): 137–156.

24.

Dunaway

(2015) Seeing Green: The Use and Abuse of Environmental Images, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Edgerton

McKechnie

Dunleavy

(2009) Behavioral determinants of household participation in a home composting scheme. Environment and Behavior 41(2): 151–169.

26.

Elmore

(2012) The American beverage industry and the development of curbside recycling Programs, 1950–2000. Business History Review 86(3): 477–501.

27.

Entwistle

(1999) Towards sustainable waste management: Central steering, local enabling or autopoiesis? Policy and Politics 27(3): 375–388.

28.

Folz

Giles

(2002) Municipal experience with ‘pay-as-you-throw’ policies: Findings from a national survey. State and Local Government Review 34(2): 105–115.

29.

GAIA (2011) Burning public money for dirty energy: Misdirected subsidies for “waste-to-energy” incinerators. Report, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, Berkeley, CA. Available at: http://www.nypirg.org/pubs/enviro/energy/2011.11.15_BurningPublicMoney.pdf (accessed 28 June 2017).

30.

Gandy

(1994) Recycling and the Politics of Urban Waste, London: Earthscan.

31.

Gibbs

Longhurst

Braithwaite

(1998) ‘Struggling with sustainability’: Weak and strong interpretations of sustainable development within local authority policy. Environment and Planning A 30(8): 1351–1365.

32.

Gille

(2007) From the Cult of Waste to the Trash Heap of History: The Politics of Waste in Socialist and Postsocialist Hungary, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

33.

Graham

Marvin

(2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, New York: Routledge.

34.

Groden C (2015) American recycling is in trouble: Can big waste fix it? Fortune, 3 September.

35.

Guy

Graham

Marvin

(1999) Splintering networks: The social, spatial and environmental implications of the privatization and liberalization of Utilities in Britain. In: Courtard

(ed.) The Governance of Large Technical Systems, London: Routledge, pp. 149–169.

36.

Guy

Marvin

Medd

et al. (2011) Shaping Urban Infrastructures: Intermediaries and the Governance of Socio-technical Networks, London: Earthscan.

37.

Hallas-Burt

Halstead

(2004) Pay-as-you-throw trash pricing. BioCycle 45(9): 30–32.

38.

Hawkins

(2006) The Ethics of Waste; How We Relate to Rubbish, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

39.

Hayes

(1990) Harnessing market forces to protect the earth. Issues in Science and Technology 7(2): 46–51.

40.

Herczeg M (2013) Municipal waste management in Switzerland. Report. Copenhagen Resource Institute, Copenhagen. Available at: file:///Users/lilyp/Downloads/Switzerland_MSW.pdf (accessed 28 June 2017).

41.

Howell

(2015a) ‘Modes of governing’ and solid waste management in Maui, Hawaii, USA. Environment and Planning A 47(10): 2153–2169.

42.

Howell

(2015b) The fate of waste in Hawaii: Technology assessment and solid waste planning in Hawaii, 1968–78. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 36: 67–82.

43.

Hughes

(1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

44.

Jenkins

Martinez

Palmer

et al. (2003) The determinants of household recycling: A material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(2): 294–318.

45.

Lakhan

(2015) A comparison of single and multi-stream recycling systems in Ontario, Canada. Resources 4(2): 384–397.

46.

Land S (2016) The class politics of decluttering. New York Times, 18 July, A25.

47.

Layzer JA, Tanner K, Nochur A, et al. (2013) Municipal composting assessment. Report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. On file with author.

48.

Liboiron M (2014) Solutions to waste and the problem of scalar mismatches. Discard Studies. Available at: https://discardstudies.com/2014/02/10/solutions-to-waste-and-the-problem-of-scalar-mismatches/ (accessed 1 June 2017).

49.

Lilja

(2009) From waste prevention to promotion of material efficiency: Change of discourse in the waste policy of Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(2): 129–136.

50.

Luke

(1997) Ecocritique: Contesting the Politics of Nature, Economy, and Culture, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

51.

MacBride

(2012) Recycling Reconsidered: The Present Failure and Future Promise of Environmental Action in the United States, Cambridge: MIT Press.

52.

McDonough

Braungart

(2002) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, New York: Northpoint Press.

53.

Maniates

(2001) Individualization: Plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global Environmental Politics 1(3): 31–52.

54.

MassDEP (2013) Massachusetts 2010–2020 solid waste master plan: Pathway to zero waste. Report, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Boston, MA. Available at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/recycle/reports/solid-waste-master-plan.html#1 (accessed 1 June 2017).

55.

MassDEP (2015) Pay-as-you-throw basics for municipalities. Report, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Boston, MA. Available at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/recycle/reduce/paytbasics.pdf (accessed 1 June 2017).

56.

MassDEP (2016) 2015 municipal solid waste & recycling survey reponses. Report, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Boston, MA. Available at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/recycle/reports/waste-reduction-and-recycling.html (accessed 12 August 2016).

57.

Melosi

(2005) Garbage in the Cities: Refuse, Reform, and the Environment, Revised ed. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

58.

Memon

(2010) Integrated solid waste management based on the 3R approach. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 12: 30–40.

59.

Morakawski

(2010) Single stream uncovered. Resource Recycling 3: 17–39.

60.

Moss

(2009) Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition. Environment and Planning A 41: 1480–1495.

61.

Murdoch

(2000) Space against time: Competing rationalities in planning for housing. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25(4): 503–519.

62.

Nagle

(2013) Picking Up: On the Streets and Behind the Trucks with the Sanitation Workers of New York City, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

63.

Nierstedt J (2009) Boston to begin no-sort recycling program July 1. Boston Globe, 24 June, B13.

64.

Parizeau KM (2011) Urban dirty work: Labour strategies, environmental health, and coping among informal recyclers in Buenos Aires, Argentina. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.

65.

Perry

(1998) Collecting Garbage: Dirty Work, Clean Jobs, Proud People, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

66.

Pollans LB (2017) Wasteways: Regimes and resistance on the path to sustainable urban infrastructure. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

67.

Quill E (1985) Saugus officials Criticize Flynn’s trash decision. Boston Globe, 4 August, 25.

68.

Royte

(2005) Garbage Land, New York: Back Bay Books/Little, Brown and Company.

69.

Russell J (2011) AG investigating waste incinerator. Boston Globe, 4 January, B1.

70.

Schor

(2000) Do Americans Shop Too Much?, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

71.

Shove

Walker

(2010) Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy 39: 471–476.

72.

Simmons

Kaufman

Themelis

(2006) State of garbage in America: Recycling data analysis. BioCycle 47(10): 21–25.

73.

Southerton D, Chappells H and Van Vliet B (eds) (2004) Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

74.

Star

(1999) Ethnography of infrastructure. The American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377–391.

75.

Strasser

(1999) Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash, New York: Metropolitan Books.

76.

Tarr JA and Dupuy G (eds) (1988) Technology and the Rise of the Networked City in Europe and America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

77.

Troschinetz

Mihelcic

(2009) Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries. Waste Management 29(2): 915–923.

78.

Unruh

(2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12): 817–830.

79.

U.S. EPA (2002) What is integrated solid waste management? Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/wycd/waste/downloads/overview.pdf (accessed 1 June 2017).

80.

U.S. EPA (2009) Sustainable materials management: The road ahead. Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-materials-management-road-ahead (accessed 1 June 2017).

81.

U.S. EPA (2016) Advancing sustainable materials management: 2014 Fact Sheet. Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-11/documents/2014_smmfactsheet_508.pdf (accessed 1 June 2017).

82.

U.S. EPA (n.d.) Sustainable materials management: Non-hazardous materials and waste management hierarchy. Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-materials-management-non-hazardous-materials-and-waste-management-hierarchy (accessed 12 August 2016).

83.

Van Horen

(2004) Fragmented coherence: Solid waste management in Colombo. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(4): 757–773.

84.

Wagner

(2007) Reframing garbage: Solid waste policy formulation in Nova Scotia. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques 33(4): 459–475.

85.

Zero Waste International Alliance (n.d) “ZW Definition.” Available at: http://zwia.org/standards/zw-definition/ (accessed 1 June 2017).

86.

Zimring

(2004) Dirty work: How hygiene and xenophobia marginalized the American waste trades, 1870–1930. Environmental History 9(1): 80–101.