The effect of Weibull distribution-based stochastic fiber/matrix interface strength on the transverse tensile strength and failure process of long fiber reinforced composites was numerically investigated in represent volume elements. The transverse tensile strength and failure strain of the stochastic interface strength models are much lower than the identical interface strength cases, indicating that transverse tensile strength calculated from the identical interface strength model will lead to an overestimation. In the stochastic interface strength model, failure path goes along interfaces of lower strength but not always the lowest strength, and variation of fiber location distribution will lead to a different failure process. Influence of the two Weibull parameters on the transverse tensile strength was also investigated. The transverse tensile strength improves with the increase of Weibull scale parameter and shape parameter. A small value of shape parameter will lead to a scattered interface strength distribution and much lower transverse tensile strength.
LiuYYanYYangL. Prediction on macroscopic elastic properties of interphase-contained long-fiber-reinforced composites and multiple nonlinear regression analysis. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31: 1143–1157.
4.
KoyanagiJOgiharaSNakataniH. Mechanical properties of fiber/matrix interface in polymer matrix composites. Adv Compos Mater2014; 23: 551–570.
5.
Ashouri VajariDLegarthBNNiordsonCF. Micromechanical modeling of unidirectional composites with uneven interfacial strengths. Eur J Mech A/Solids2013; 42: 241–250.
6.
O’DwyerDJO’DowdNPMcCarthyCT. Micromechanical investigation of damage processes at composite-adhesive interfaces. Compos Sci Technol2013; 86: 61–69.
7.
O’DwyerDJO’DowdNPMcCarthyCT. Numerical micromechanical investigation of interfacial strength parameters in a carbon fibre composite material. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 749–760.
8.
RomanowiczM. Effect of interfacial debonding on the failure behavior in a fiber-reinforced composite subjected to transverse tension. Comput Mater Sci2009; 47: 225–231.
9.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. Micromechanical modelling of the transverse damage behaviour in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 388–396.
10.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. A micromechanical study on the effect of intra-ply properties on transverse shear fracture in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1217–1228.
11.
WangXZhangJWangZ. Effects of interphase properties in unidirectional fiber reinforced composite materials. Mater Des2011; 32: 3486–3492.
12.
YangLYanYLiuY. Microscopic failure mechanisms of fiber-reinforced polymer composites under transverse tension and compression. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1818–1825.
13.
ShaJJDaiJXLiJ. Measurement and analysis of fiber-matrix interface strength of carbon fiber-reinforced phenolic resin matrix composites. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 1303–1311.
14.
AshcroftIAKhokarZRSilberschmidtVV. Modelling the effect of microstructural randomness on the mechanical response of composite laminates through the application of stochastic cohesive zone elements. Comput Mater Sci2012; 52: 95–100.
15.
KhokharZRAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Simulations of delamination in CFRP laminates: effect of microstructural randomness. Comput Mater Sci2009; 46: 607–613.
16.
KhokharZRAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Interaction of matrix cracking and delamination in cross-ply laminates: simulations with stochastic cohesive zone elements. Appl Compos Mater2011; 18: 3–16.
17.
KhokharZRAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Three-dimensional analysis of the effect of material randomness on the damage behaviour of CFRP laminates with stochastic cohesive-zone elements. Appl Compos Mater2014; 21: 71–89.
18.
MalignoARWarriorNALongAC. Effects of inter-fibre spacing on damage evolution in unidirectional (UD) fibre-reinforced composites. Eur J Mech A/Solids2009; 28: 768–776.
19.
MatsudaTOhnoNTanakaH. Effects of fiber distribution on elastic–viscoplastic behavior of long fiber-reinforced laminates. Int J Mech Sci2003; 45: 1583–1598.
20.
RomanowiczM. Progressive failure analysis of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers with inhomogeneous interphase and randomly distributed fibers under transverse tensile loading. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 1829–1838.
21.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. A combined experimental–numerical approach for generating statistically equivalent fibre distributions for high strength laminated composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 291–297.
22.
GonzálezCLlorcaJ. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2795–2806.
23.
QingHMishnaevskyLJr. Unidirectional high fiber content composites: automatic 3D FE model generation and damage simulation. Comput Mater Sci2009; 47: 548–555.
24.
OkabeTNishikawaMToyoshimaH. A periodic unit-cell simulation of fiber arrangement dependence on the transverse tensile failure in unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct2011; 48: 2948–2959.
25.
WangZWangXZhangJ. Automatic generation of random distribution of fibers in long-fiber-reinforced composites and mesomechanical simulation. Mater Des2011; 32: 885–891.
26.
HobbiebrunkenTHojoMJinKK. Influence of non-uniform fiber arrangement on microscopic stress and failure initiation in thermally and transversely loaded CF/epoxy laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 3107–3113.
27.
HojoMMizunoMHobbiebrunkenT. Effect of fiber array irregularities on microscopic interfacial normal stress states of transversely loaded UD-CFRP from viewpoint of failure initiation. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1726–1734.
28.
AspLEBerglundLATalrejaR. A criterion for crack initiation in glassy polymers subjected to a composite-like stress state. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 1291–1301.
29.
AspLEBerglundLAGudmundsonP. Effects of a composite-like stress state on the fracture of epoxies. Compos Sci Technol1995; 53: 27–37.
30.
TotryEMolina-AldareguíaJMGonzálezC. Effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear deformation of carbon-fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 970–980.
31.
TotryEGonzálezCLlorcaJ. Failure locus of fiber-reinforced composites under transverse compression and out-of-plane shear. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 829–839.
32.
Fiedler B, Hobbiebrunken T, Hojo M, et al. Influence of stress state and temperature on the strength of epoxy resins. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fracture (ICF 11), Turin, Italy, 20–25 March 2005, pp.2271--2275. New York, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.
33.
Cid AlfaroMVSuikerASJVerhooselCV. Numerical homogenization of cracking processes in thin fibre-epoxy layers. Eur J Mech A/Solids2010; 29: 119–131.
