Prior studies on marital satisfaction and health rarely consider whether improvements and declines have asymmetric effects. This study examined asymmetric associations between changes in marital satisfaction and frailty among older adults.
Methods
Data came from 4,833 married adults aged 65+ in the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging. Frailty was assessed using a 41-item deficit-accumulation frailty index (0–100). Asymmetric fixed effects models distinguished the effects of increases versus decreases in marital satisfaction. Unconditional quantile regression within a fixed effects framework examined heterogeneity across the frailty distribution.
Results
Declines in marital satisfaction were associated with larger increases in frailty than the reductions linked to comparable improvements. Among women, associations were largely symmetric. Among men, declines in marital satisfaction were strongly associated with higher frailty, whereas improvements showed limited protective effects, particularly at mid-to-upper frailty levels.
Conclusion
These findings highlight gendered and asymmetric health consequences of marital relationships in later life.
AndrewM. K.KeefeJ. M. (2014). Social vulnerability from a social ecology perspective: A cohort study of older adults from the national population health survey of Canada. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-90
2.
AntonucciT. C.AkiyamaH. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42(5), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/42.5.519
3.
AuclairU.EpsteinC.MittelmanM. (2009). Couples counseling in alzheimer’s disease: Additional clinical findings from a novel intervention study. Clinical Gerontologist, 32(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317110802676809
4.
BaekW.MinA. (2022). Frailty index and gender‐specific mortality in Korean adults: Findings from the Korean longitudinal study of aging (2006–2018). Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15168
5.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
6.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
7.
BorgenN. T. (2016). Fixed effects in unconditional quantile regression. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 16(2), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1601600208
8.
CarrD.FreedmanV. A.CornmanJ. C.SchwarzN. (2014). Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 930–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf
9.
CarstensenL. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331
10.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
11.
ChoiH. (2021a). Giving or receiving spouse care and marital satisfaction among older Korean individuals. Social Science & Medicine, 272, 112071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.012
CornwellE. Y.WaiteL. J. (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000103
14.
CourtenayW. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1
15.
DiMatteoM. R. (2004). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 23(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207
16.
FanJ.YuC.GuoY.BianZ.SunZ.YangL.ChenY.DuH.LiZ.LeiY.SunD.ClarkeR.ChenJ.ChenZ.LvJ.LiL.China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group. (2020). Frailty index and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Chinese adults: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 5(12), e650–e660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30113-4
FriedL. P.TangenC. M.WalstonJ.NewmanA. B.HirschC.GottdienerJ.SeemanT.TracyR.KopW. J.BurkeG.McBurnieM. A.Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(3), M146–M157. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146
19.
GaleC. R.WestburyL.CooperC. (2018). Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: The English longitudinal study of ageing. Age and Ageing, 47(3), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx188
20.
HoogendijkE. O.AfilaloJ.EnsrudK. E.KowalP.OnderG.FriedL. P. (2019). Frailty: Implications for clinical practice and public health. The Lancet, 394(10206), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6
JangS. N.KawachiI. (2019). Care inequality: Care received according to gender, marital status, and socioeconomic status among Korean older adults with disability. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1008-0
KimJ.HwangS. (2024). The asymmetric effects of improving and declining marital satisfaction on cognitive function. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(4), 887–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12991
25.
KimJ.KwonK. Y. (2024). Marital dissatisfaction and functional performance in older adults: Heterogeneity in the association by educational level. Social Science & Medicine, 340, 116460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116460
26.
KimJ.ParkS.KwonK. Y. (2025). Spousal loss and physical vulnerability: Diverging frailty trajectories by educational attainment in older adults. Social Science & Medicine, 382, 118408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118408
27.
KimY. (2021). Gender differences in the link between marital quality and cognitive decline among older adults in Korea. Psychiatry Investigation, 18(11), 1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2021.0131
28.
LawrenceE. M.RogersR. G.ZajacovaA.WadsworthT. (2019). Marital happiness, marital status, health, and longevity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(5), 1539–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0009-9
29.
LiY.XueQ.OddenM. C.ChenX.WuC. (2020). Linking early life risk factors to frailty in old age: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study. Age and Ageing, 49(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz160
30.
LiuH.ZhangZ.ZhangY. (2021). A national longitudinal study of marital quality and cognitive decline among older men and women. Social Science and Medicine, 282, 114151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114151
31.
MehrabiF.PomeroyM. L.CudjoeT. K. M.JenkinsE.DentE.HoogendijkE. O. (2024). The temporal sequence and reciprocal relationships of frailty, social isolation and loneliness in older adults across 21 years. Age and Ageing, 53(10), afae215. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae215
32.
MinJ.YorgasonJ. B.FastJ.ChudykA. (2020). The impact of spouse’s illness on depressive symptoms: The roles of spousal caregiving and marital satisfaction. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(7), 1548–1557. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz017
33.
NamN.KimJ. (2026). Later-life employment transitions and frailty: A gendered analysis using asymmetric fixed-effects models. Research on Aging, Article 1640275261449787. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275261449787
OhE.KangY.ShinJ. H.YeonB. K. (2010). A validity study of K-MMSE as a screening test for dementia: Comparison against a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders, 9(1), 8–12.
36.
ParkK.KimJ. (2025). How are marital transitions associated with cognitive functioning amid health declines? A gender-specific hybrid panel model analysis using the health and retirement study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 80(11), gbaf152. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf152
37.
PearlinL. I.SchiemanS.FazioE. M.MeersmanS. C. (2005). Stress, health, and the life course: Some conceptual perspectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600206
38.
Pérez-ZepedaM. U.GodinJ.ArmstrongJ. J.AndrewM. K.MitnitskiA.KirklandS.RockwoodK.TheouO. (2021). Frailty among middle-aged and older Canadians: Population norms for the frailty index using the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. Age and Ageing, 50(2), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa144
39.
RiviereL. A.SinclairR. R. (2023). Validation and reliability estimation of the brief marital satisfaction screening tool. Contemporary Family Therapy, 45(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-022-09638-5
40.
RoblesT. F.SlatcherR. B.TrombelloJ. M.McGinnM. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859
41.
RockwoodK.MitnitskiA. (2007). Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 62(7), 722–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.7.722
SearleS. D.MitnitskiA.GahbauerE. A.GillT. M.RockwoodK. (2008). A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatrics, 8(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24
44.
SongK.KimJ. (2024). Widowhood and functional impairment: Gender-specific trajectories of sensory and masticatory functions. Ageing and Society, 44(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X23000557
45.
TaylorS. E.KleinL. C.LewisB. P.GruenewaldT. L.GurungR. A. R.UpdegraffJ. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411
46.
TaylorS. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67
47.
ThoitsP. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592
WaiteL. J.GallagherM. (2001). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. Doubleday.
50.
WonC. W.YangK. Y.RhoY. G.KimS. Y.LeeE. J.YoonJ. L.ChoK. H.ShinH. C.ChoB. R.OhJ. R.YoonD. K.LeeH. S.LeeY. S. (2002). The development of Korean activities of daily living(K-ADL) and Korean instrumental activities of daily living(K-IADL) scale. Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society, 6(2), 107–120.
51.
YooJ.-I.ChoiH.HaY.-C. (2017). Mean hand grip strength and cut-off value for sarcopenia in Korean adults using KNHANES VI. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(5), 868–872. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.868
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
