A consistent finding from recent work on the evaluation of planning outcomes has been that local commitment to planning plays a vital role in explaining those outcomes, especially when planning is promoted as a way to address regional development management concerns. While the importance of local commitment is not surprising, many questions remain, such as what “local commitment” means, what motivates it, and how it operates to affect local planning efforts and outcomes. This article presents results from a study of state-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina during the mid-1990s, focusing on the factors that appear to motivate local elected officials’ commitment to planning and the influence of their commitment on planning outcomes. Taken altogether, coastal localities generally failed to address coastal resource protection through their local planning beyond complying with minimum state resource protection rules. This was largely because of resistance to the imposition of state-level policies through local planning requirements. State mandates appeared to foster local commitment to planning but not the state’s development management goals. Within that context, local elected officials’ commitment to planning played an important role in enhancing both plan quality and plan implementation.
Allison, Paul D.1999. Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
2.
Baer, William C.1997. General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association63 (3): 329-344.
3.
Berke, Philip R., J. Crawford, Jennifer E. Dixon, and Neil J. Ericksen. 1999. Do cooperative environmental planning mandates produce good plans? Empirical results from the New Zealand experience. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26:643-664.
4.
Berke, Philip R., and Steven P. French. 1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research13:237-250.
5.
Berke, Philip R., Dale Roenigk, Edward J. Kaiser, and Raymond J. Burby. 1996. Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management39:79-96.
6.
Birkland, Thomas A.1997. After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
7.
Briffault, Richard. 1990. Our localism: Part I—The structure of local government law. Columbia Law Review90 (1): 1-115.
8.
Burby, Raymond J.1998. Policies for sustainable land use. In Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities, ed. R. J. Burby.Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
9.
Burby, Raymond J., Philip R. Berke, Linda C. Dalton, John M. DeGrove, Steven P. French, Edward J. Kaiser, Peter J. May, and Dale Roenigk. 1993. Is state-mandated planning effective? Land Use Law and Zoning Digest45 (10): 3-9.
10.
Burby, Raymond J., and Peter J. May. 1997. Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Burby, Raymond J., and Peter J. May. 1998. Intergovernmental environmental planning: Addressing the commitment conundrum. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41 (1): 95-110.
12.
Carruthers, John I.2002. The impacts of state growth management programmes: A comparative analysis. Urban Studies39 (11): 1959-1982.
13.
Dalton, Linda C., and Raymond J. Burby. 1994. Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association60 (4): 444-461.
14.
DeGrove, John M.1984. Land, growth and politics. Washington, DC: Planners Press, American Planning Association.
15.
Deyle, Robert E., and Richard A. Smith. 1998. Local government compliance with state planning mandates: The effects of state implementation in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association64 (4): 457-469.
16.
Fischer, Frank, and John Forester, eds. 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Gale, Dennis E.1992. Eight state-sponsored growth management programs: A comparative analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association58 (4): 425-439.
19.
Godschalk, David R.1992. Implementing coastal zone management: 1972-1990. Coastal Management20:93-116.
20.
Godschalk, David R., Timothy Beatley, Philip R. Berke, David J. Brower, and Edward J. Kaiser. 1999. Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
21.
Goggin, Malcolm L.1986. The “too few cases/too many variables” problem in implementation research. Western Political Quarterly38:328-347.
Heath, Milton S.1974. A legislative history of the Coastal Area Management Act. North Carolina Law Review52 (2): 345-398.
24.
Heath, Milton S., and David W. Owens. 1994. Coastal management law in North Carolina 1974-1994. North Carolina Law Review72 (6): 1413-1451.
25.
Johnson, Michael P.1991. Commitment to personal relationships. In Advances in personal relationships, ed. W. H. Jones and D. W. Perlman.London: Jessica Kingsley.
26.
Klosterman, Richard. 1985. Arguments for and against planning. Town Planning Review56 (1): 5-20.
27.
Longest, Ryke, and Robin Smith. 2000. Assistant Attorney General, State of North Carolina, and Assistant Secretary, NC Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources. Presentation to Land Use Planning Review Team, Carteret County Community College, Morehead City, NC, July 26.
28.
Lyons, W. E., David Lowery, and Ruth Hoogland DeHoog. 1992. The politics of dissatisfaction: Citizens, services, and urban institutions. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
29.
Mallin, Michael A., Scott H. Ensign, Matthew R. McIver, G. Christopher Shank, and Patricia K. Fowler. 2001. Demographic, landscape, and meterological factors controlling the microbial pollution in coastal waters. Hydrobiologia460 (1): 185-193.
30.
Mallin, Michael A., and Tracey L. Wheeler. 2000. Nutrient and fecal coliform discharge from coastal North Carolina golf courses. Journal of Environmental Quality29 (3): 979-986.
31.
Mallin, Michael A., Kathleen E. Williams, E. Cartier Esham, and R. Patrick Lowe. 2000. Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecological Applications10 (4): 1047-1056.
32.
Marshall, Catherine, and Gretchen B. Rossman. 1995. Designing qualitative research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
May, Peter J., Raymond J. Burby, Neil J. Ericksen, John W. Handmer, Jennifer E. Dixon, Sara Michaels, and D. Ingle Smith. 1996. Environmental management and governance: Intergovernmental approaches to hazards and sustainability. New York: Routledge.
34.
Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Munro, John F.1993. California water politics: Explaining policy change in a cognitively polarized subsystem. In Policy change and social learning: An advocacy coalition approach, ed. H. C. Jenkins-Smith and P. A. Sabatier.Boulder, CO: Westview.
36.
North Carolina Coastal Futures Committee. 1994. Charting a course for our coast: A report to the governor. Raleigh, NC: Division of Coastal Management.
37.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management. 1986. Protecting coastal water quality through local planning. Raleigh, NC: Division of Coastal Management.
38.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management. 1994. Managing cumulative impacts in the North Carolina coastal area. Raleigh, NC: Division of Coastal Management.
39.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management. 1999. Protecting North Carolina’s coastal resources: A framework for maintaining and improving water quality. Raleigh, NC: NC Estuarine Shoreline Protection Stakeholders Group, for the Division of Coastal Management.
40.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management. 2000. Land Use Plan Review Team: Report to the Coastal Resources Commission. Raleigh, NC: Division of Coastal Management.
41.
Norton, Richard K.2005a. More and better planning: State-man-dated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association71 (1): 55-71.
42.
Norton, Richard K.2005b. Striking the balance between environment and economy in coastal North Carolina. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management48 (2): 177-207.
43.
Owens, David W.1985. Coastal management in North Carolina: Building a regional consensus. Journal of the American Planning Association51 (3): 322-329.
44.
Owens, David W.1999. Legislative zoning decisions: Legal aspects. 2nd ed.Chapel Hill: Institute of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
45.
Rusbult, Caryl E., John M. Martz, and Christopher R. Agnew. 1998. The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, investment level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships5:357-391.
46.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Anne M. Brasher. 1993. From vague consensus to clearly differentiated coalitions: Environmental policy at Lake Tahoe 1964-1985. In Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach, ed. P. A. Sabatier and H. C. Jenkins-Smith.Boulder, CO: Westview.
47.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, eds. 1993. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Theories of the policy process, ed. P. A. Sabatier.Boulder: Westview.
49.
Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
Talen, Emily. 1996. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature10 (3): 248-259.
51.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1978. State of North Carolina Coastal Management Program and final environmental impact statement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Coastal Zone Management.
52.
Weitz, Jerry. 1999. Sprawl busting: State programs to guide growth. Chicago: Planners Press, American Planning Association.
