This article examines how Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) respond to vehicle electrification and factors that shape these strategies. Using multiple quantitative and qualitative methods, an analysis of planning documents from fifty-two MPOs finds that most MPOs recognize the environmental potential of electric vehicles (EVs), as well as the emerging challenges related to funding, infrastructure, and implementation. The results also highlight the influence of state-level EV policies and regional car dependence on MPO responses. These findings suggest that EV planning should be more closely integrated with state transportation and environmental strategies and coordinated with broader transportation decarbonization efforts.
AnilanV.VijAkshay. 2024. “Taking the Wheel: Systematic Review of Reviews of Policies Driving BEV Adoption.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment136:104424. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104424.
2.
BaerWilliam C.1997. “General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans.”Journal of the American Planning Association63 (3): 329–44. doi:10.1080/01944369708975926.
3.
BarbourElisaDeakinElizabeth A.2012. “Smart Growth Planning for Climate Protection.”Journal of the American Planning Association78 (1): 70–86. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.645272.
4.
BleiDavid M.LaffertyJohn D.2009. “Topic Models.” In Text Mining, edited by SrivastavaAshokSahamiMehran, 71–94. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
BoeingGeoffLuYougengPilgramClemens. 2023. “Local Inequities in the Relative Production of and Exposure to Vehicular Air Pollution in Los Angeles.”Urban Studies60 (12): 2351–68. doi:10.1177/00420980221145403.
BrinkleyCatherineRegaladoSelenaBoswellMichael R.2026. “Which Plans Matter for Creating Actionable, Equitable Climate Policy: Comprehensive or Climate Action Plans?”Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically January 22. doi:10.1177/0739456X251398452.
9.
BrinkleyCatherineWagnerJenny. 2024. “Who Is Planning for Environmental Justice—and How?.”Journal of the American Planning Association90 (1): 63–76. doi:10.1080/01944363.2022.2118155.
10.
CarltonGregorySultanaSelima. 2022. “Transport Equity Considerations in Electric Vehicle Charging Research: A Scoping Review.”Transport Reviews43:330–55. doi:10.1080/01441647.2022.2109775.
11.
ChenZhenhuaCarrelAndre L.GoreChristinaShiWei. 2021. “Environmental and Economic Impact of Electric Vehicle Adoption in the U.S.”Environmental Research Letters16:05011. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abe2d0.
12.
ChomaErnani F.EvansJohn S.HammittJames K.Gómez-IbáñezJosé A.SpenglerJohn D.2020. “Assessing the Health Impacts of Electric Vehicles through Air Pollution in the United States.”Environment International144:106015. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.106015.
13.
ClintonBentley C.SteinbergDaniel C.2019. “Providing the Spark: Impact of Financial Incentives on Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management98:102255. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102255.
EgnérFilippaTrosvikLina. 2018. “Electric Vehicle Adoption in Sweden and the Impact of Local Policy Instruments.”Energy Policy121:584–96. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.040.
16.
FonsecaCamilaJiangHaiyueZeerakRaihanaZhirong ZhaoJerry. 2024. “Explaining the Adoption of Electric Vehicle Fees across the United States.”Transport Policy149:139–49. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.005.
17.
FuXinyu. 2024. “Natural Language Processing in Urban Planning: A Research Agenda.”Journal of Planning Literature39 (3): 395–407. doi:10.1177/08854122241229571.
18.
GrengsJoeLevineJonathanShenQingShenQingyun. 2010. “Intermetropolitan Comparison of Transportation Accessibility: Sorting out Mobility and Proximity in San Francisco and Washington, D.C.”Journal of Planning Education and Research29 (4): 4. doi:10.1177/0739456X10363278.
19.
GuerraErick. 2016. “Planning for Cars That Drive Themselves: Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Regional Transportation Plans, and Autonomous Vehicles.”Journal of Planning Education and Research36 (2): 2.
20.
HayashidaSherilynCroixSumner LaCoffmanMakena. 2021. “Understanding Changes in Electric Vehicle Policies in the U.S. States, 2010–2018.”Transport Policy103:211–23. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.001.
21.
HendersonJason. 2020. “EVs Are Not the Answer: A Mobility Justice Critique of Electric Vehicle Transitions.”Annals of the American Association of Geographers110 (6): 1993–2010. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1744422.
22.
IsoahoKaroliinaGritsenkoDariaMäkeläEetu. 2021. “Topic Modeling and Text Analysis for Qualitative Policy Research.”Policy Studies Journal49 (1): 300–24. doi:10.1111/psj.12343.
23.
JennAlanAzevedoInês LimaFischbeckPaul. 2015. “How Will We Fund Our Roads? A Case of Decreasing Revenue from Electric Vehicles.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice74:136–47. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.004.
24.
JennAlanSpringelKatalinGopalAnand R.2018. “Effectiveness of Electric Vehicle Incentives in the United States.”Energy Policy119:349–56. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.065.
LevineJonathanGrengsJoeShenQingyunShenQing. 2012. “Does Accessibility Require Density or Speed? A Comparison of Fast versus Close in Getting Where You Want to Go in US Metropolitan Regions.”Journal of the American Planning Association78 (2): 2.
27.
LewisRebeccaClarkBenjamin Y.2021. “Retooling Local Transportation Financing in a New Mobility Future.”Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives10:100388. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100388.
28.
LiShanjunWangBinglinYangMuxiuZhangFan. 2022. Charging Infrastructure and Consumer Incentives Drive Cross-country Disparities in Electric Vehicle Adoption. https://docsend.com/view/m98yw5c3rs6jazz6
29.
LiangJingQiuYueming (Lucy)LiuPengfeiHePanMauzerallDenise L.2023. “Effects of Expanding Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in California on the Housing Market.”Nature Sustainability6 (5): 549–58. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-01058-5.
30.
McAslanDevonGabrieleMaxMillerThaddeus R.2021. “Planning and Policy Directions for Autonomous Vehicles in Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) in the United States.”Journal of Urban Technology28 (3–4): 175–201. doi:10.1080/10630732.2021.1944751.
31.
McAslanDevonKenneyLisaArevaloFarah NajarKingDavid A.MillerThaddeus R.2024. “Planning for Uncertain Transportation Futures: Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Emerging Technologies, and Adaptive Transport Planning.”Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives24:101055. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2024.101055.
32.
Millard-BallAdam. 2013. “The Limits to Planning: Causal Impacts of City Climate Action Plans.”Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (1): 1. doi:10.1177/0739456X12449742.
33.
Millard-BallAdamGuerraErick. 2025. “Should Environmentalists Support the Gasoline Tax?.”Journal of the American Planning Association91 (3): 445–48. doi:10.1080/01944363.2024.2394058.
34.
MullinMeganFeiockRichard C.NiemeierDeb. 2024. “Climate Planning and Implementation in Metropolitan Transportation Governance.”Journal of Planning Education and Research44 (1): 28–38. doi:10.1177/0739456X20946443.
35.
NiemeierDebGrattetRykenBeamishThomas. 2015. “‘Blueprinting’ and Climate Change: Regional Governance and Civic Participation in Land Use and Transportation Planning.”Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy33 (6): 1600–17. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614181.
OstromElinor. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.”The American Economic Review100 (3): 641–72. doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641.
38.
PanShuaiYuWendiFultonLewis M.JungJiaChoiYunsooGaoH. Oliver. 2023. “Impacts of the Large-Scale Use of Passenger Electric Vehicles on Public Health in 30 US. Metropolitan Areas.”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews173:113100. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.113100.
39.
PierceLoganBuiAnh. 2024. Electric Vehicle Charging at Multifamily Homes in the United States: Barriers, Solutions, and Selected Equity Considerations. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.
40.
ProffittDavid G.BartholomewKeithEwingReidMillerHarvey J.2019. “Accessibility Planning in American Metropolitan Areas: Are We There Yet?”Urban Studies56 (1): 1.
41.
QiuY. Q.ZhouP.SunH. C.2019. “Assessing the Effectiveness of City-Level Electric Vehicle Policies in China.”Energy Policy130:22–31. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.052.
42.
RaginCharles C.2014. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
SchreierMargrit. 2026. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. 1st ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781529682571.
45.
SciaraGian-Claudia. 2017. “Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Lessons from the Past, Institutions for the Future.”Journal of the American Planning Association83 (3): 3.
46.
SheldonTamara L.DeShazoJ. R.2017. “How Does the Presence of HOV Lanes Affect Plug-in Electric Vehicle Adoption in California? A Generalized Propensity Score Approach.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management85:146–70. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.002.
47.
Soltani-SobhAliHeaslipKevinBosworthRyanBarnesRyan. 2015. “Effect of Improving Vehicle Fuel Efficiency on Fuel Tax Revenue and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.”Transportation Research Record2502 (1): 71–79. doi:10.3141/2502-09.
SrinivasanSivaramakrishnanLugoMiguelSpanaStephenMaldonadoPedroSteinerRuthElefteriadouLilyYinYafengCraneCarl. 2016. Surveying Florida MPO Readiness to Incorporate Innovative Technologies into Long Range Transportation Plans: Draft Final Report. The Florida Department of Transportation Research Office. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31377.
50.
StokesLeah C.BreetzHanna L.2018. “Politics in the U.S. Energy Transition: Case Studies of Solar, Wind, Biofuels and Electric Vehicles Policy.”Energy Policy113:76–86. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.057.
51.
TaylorBrian D.MorrisEric A.BrownJeffrey R.2023. The Drive for Dollars: How Fiscal Politics Shaped Urban Freeways and Transformed American Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
ThiemAlrikDuşaAdrian. 2013. “QCA: A Package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis.”The R Journal5 (1): 87–87. doi:10.32614/RJ-2013-009.
53.
TillyNiklasYigitcanlarTanDegirmenciKenanHeSylvia Y.LooBeckyPazAlexander. 2025. “Electric Vehicles and Sustainable Development Goals: A Multi-Level Governance Analysis.”Transport Policy171:239–55. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.008.
WangNingPanHuizhongZhengWenhui. 2017. “Assessment of the Incentives on Electric Vehicle Promotion in China.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice101:177–89. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.037.
XiaXiaoningLiPengweiXiaZhenguoWuRuiChengYang. 2022. “Life Cycle Carbon Footprint of Electric Vehicles in Different Countries: A Review.”Separation and Purification Technology301:122063. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122063.
ZhengYunhanKeithDavid R.WangShenhaoDiaoMiZhaoJinhua. 2024. “Effects of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations on the Economic Vitality of Local Businesses.”Nature Communications15 (1): 7437. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51554-9.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
