In this microanalysis, a university writing center conference with an experienced tutor and a student he has never met before is analyzed for the tutor’s use of direct instruction, cognitive scaffolding, and motivational scaffolding. Along with verbal expressions of scaffolding, this analysis also considers the tutor’s hand gestures—topic gestures, which operationalize instruction and cognitive scaffolding, and interactive gestures, which operationalize motivational scaffolding. As defined in this analysis, instruction is the most directive of the three strategies and includes telling. Also directive, cognitive scaffolding leads and supports the student in making correct and useful responses, while motivational scaffolding provides feedback and helps maintain focus on the task and motivation. The microanalysis points to the importance of the student’s cognitive and motivational readiness to learn and the need for the student to control the agenda throughout the conference. It also contextualizes admonitions against tutor directiveness.
Beattie, G. ( 2004). Visible thought: A new psychology of body language. London: Rutledge.
4.
Black, L.J. ( 1998). Between talking and teaching: Reconsidering the writing conference. Logan: Utah State University Press.
5.
Blau, S.R., Hall, J., & Strauss, T. ( 1998). Exploring the tutor/client conversation: A linguistic analysis. Writing Center Journal, 19(1), 19-48.
6.
Brooks, J. ( 1991). Minimalist tutoring: Making the student do all the work . Writing Lab Newsletter, 15(6), 1-4.
7.
Brown, A.L. & Palinscar, A.S. ( 1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In J. D. Day & J. G. Borkowski (Eds.), Intelligence and exceptionally: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practices (pp. 81-132). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. ( 1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
9.
Bruffee, K.A. ( 1984). Peer tutoring and the "Conversation of mankind." In G. A. Olson (Ed.), Writing centers: Theory and administration (pp. 3-15). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
10.
Bruner, J.S. ( 1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds), The child’s conception of language (pp. 241-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Cazden, C.B. ( 2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning . (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Chickering A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. ( 1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education . American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
14.
Chin, P., Bell, K.S., Munby, H., & Hutchinson, N.L. (2004). Epistemological appropriation of one high school student’s learning in cooperative education. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 401-417.
15.
Clark, I.L. ( 1988). Collaboration and ethics in writing center pedagogy. Writing Center Journal, 9(1), 3-12.
16.
Clark, I.L. ( 1990). Maintaining chaos in the writing center: A critical perspective on writing center dogma. Writing Center Journal, 11(1), 81-93.
17.
Clark, I. ( 2001). Perspectives on the directive/nondirective continuum in the writing center. Writing Center Journal, 21(3), 33-57.
18.
Cromley, J.G. & Azevedo, R. ( 2005). What do reading tutors do? A naturalistic study of more or less experienced tutors in reading. Discourse Processes , 40, 83-113.
19.
Davis, K., Hayward, N., Hunter, K.R., & Wallace, D.L. ( 1988). The function of talk in the writing conference: A study of tutorial conversation. Writing Center Journal, 9(1), 45-51.
20.
Diaz, R.M., Neal, C.J. & Amaya-Williams, M. ( 1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 127-155). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Driskell, J.E., & Radtke, P.H. ( 2003). The effect of gesture on speech production and comprehension . Human Factors, 45, 445-454.
22.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. ( 1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
23.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. ( 1972). Hand gestures. Journal of Communication , 22, 353-374.
24.
Flynn, T., & King, M. ( 1993). Dynamics of the writing conference: Social and cognitive interaction. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
25.
Fox, B.A. ( 1993). The human tutorial project: Issues in the design of instructional systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Freedman, S.W., & Katz, A.M. ( 1987). Pedagogical interaction during the composing process: The writing conference. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 58-80). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27.
Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. ( 1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205). New York: Cambridge .
28.
Gerwing, J., & Bavelas, J. ( 2004). Linguisitic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture, 4, 157-195.
29.
Gilewicz, M., & Thonus, T. ( 2003). Close vertical transcription in writing center tutoring and research. Writing Center Journal, 24(1), 25-49.
30.
Gillespie, P., & Lerner, N. ( 2004). The Allyn and Bacon guide to peer tutoring. (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson/Longman.
31.
Goldin-Meadow, S. ( 2004). ). Gesture’s role in the learning process. Theory into Practice, 43, 314-321.
32.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. ( 1999). What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720-730.
33.
Graesser, A.C., & Person, N.K. ( 1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-37.
34.
Haas, C. & Witte, S.P. ( 2001). Writing as embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 15, 413-457.
35.
Henning, T. ( 2001, March). Theoretical models of tutor talk: How practical are they?Paper presented at CCCC, Denver, CO. (ERIC Document Service No. ED 451 569).
36.
Henning, T. ( 2005). The tutoring style decision tree: A useful heuristic for tutors. Writing Lab Newsletter, 3(1), 5-8.
37.
Hogan, K. & Pressley, M. ( 1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies with classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 74-107). Cambridge, MA : Brookline Books.
38.
Holler, J., & Beattie, G. ( 2003). Pragmatic aspects of representational gestures: Do speakers use them to clarify verbal ambiguity for the listener? Gesture , 3, 127-154.
39.
Holton, D., & Clark, D. ( 2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37, 127-143.
40.
Hung, D.W.L. ( 1999). Activity, apprenticeship, and epistemological appropriation: Implications from the writings of Michael Polanyi. Educational Psychologist, 34, 193-205.
41.
Hynd, C., Holschuh, J., & Nist, S. ( 2000). Learning complex scientific information: Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 23-57.
42.
Juel, C. ( 1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268-289.
43.
Kendon, A. ( 2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Kiedaisch, J., & Dinitz, S. ( 1993). Look back and say "So what": The limitations of the generalist tutor. Writing Center Journal, 14(1), 63-74.
45.
Lepper, M.R., Drake, M.F. & O’Donnell-Johnson, T. ( 1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 108-144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
46.
Mackiewicz, J. ( 2004). The effects of tutor expertise in engineering writing: A linguistic analysis of writing tutors’ comments. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 316-328.
47.
Mackiewicz, J. ( 2006). The functions of formulaic and nonformulaic compliments in interactions about technical writing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, 12-27.
48.
McAndrew, D.A., & Reigstad, T.J. (2001). Tutoring writing: A practical guide for conferences. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Cook.
49.
McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D.T. ( 2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 227-252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
McNeill, D. ( 2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Mehan, H. ( 1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Merrill, D.C., Reiser, B.J., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J.G. ( 1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 277-305.
53.
Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. ( 2000). What’s the use of "triadic dialogue"? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21, 376-406.
54.
Newman, S. ( 2009). The gestural enthymeme. Written Communication , 26, 273-294.
55.
Person, N.K.,, Graesser, A.C., Magliano, J.P., & Kreuz, R.J. ( 1994). Inferring what the student knows in one-to-one tutoring: The role of student questions and answers. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 205-229.
56.
Person, N.K., Kreuz, R.J., Zwaan, R.A., & Graesser, A.C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies may inhibit effective tutoring . Cognition and Instruction13, 161-188.
57.
Porter, F.L. ( 1991). An examination of consultant-student discourse in a writing center conference. PENN Working Papers, 7(2), 93-108. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341250)
58.
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. ( 2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40, 1-12.
59.
Rogoff, B. ( 1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Roth, W-M. ( 2002). From action to discourse: The bridging function of gestures . Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 535-554.
61.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.M., & Jefferson, G. ( 1978). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7-55). New York: Academic.
62.
Sauer, B. ( 1998). Embodied knowledge: The textual representation of embodied sensory information in a dynamic and uncertain material environment. Written Communication, 15, 131-169.
63.
Stone, C.A. ( 1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 31, 344-364.
64.
Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. ( 1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Thompson, I., Whyte, A., Shannon, D., Muse, A., Miller, K., Chappell, M., et al. (2009). Examining our lore: A survey of students’ and tutors’ satisfaction with writing center conferences. Writing Center Journal, 29(1), 78-106.
66.
Thonus, T. ( 2001). Triangulation in the writing center: tutor, tutee, and instructor perceptions of the tutor’s role. Writing Center Journal, 21(3), 59-82.
67.
Thonus, T. ( 2002). Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials: What is success? Assessing Writing, 8, 110-134.
68.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
Wells, G. ( 1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
70.
Wertsch, J.V. ( 1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
Williams, J. ( 2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 173-201.
72.
Wolcott, W. ( 1989). Talking it over: A qualitative study of writing center conferencing. Writing Center Journal, 9(2), 15-29.
73.
Wolfe, J. ( 2005). Gesture and collaborative planning: A case study of a student writing group. Written Communication, 22, 298-332.
74.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. ( 1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
75.
Wood, D., & Middleton, D. ( 1975). A study of assisted problem solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181-191.
76.
Wood, D., & Wood, H. ( 1996). Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 5-17.
77.
Wood, H., & Wood, D. ( 1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers & Education, 33, 153-169.
78.
Zimmerman, B.J. ( 2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. (Vol 5, 2nd ed., pp. 227-252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
