The aim of this study was to investigate possible effects of 50 Hz-1 mT magnetic field (MF) on action potential in isolated rat sciatic nerve. We used 16 Wistar rats in the study. They were divided into control (n = 10) and MF (n = 6) groups. The sciatic nerve of left legs in the MF group was exposed to 50 Hz-1 mT MF for 30 min by using a Helmholtz applicator and then action potentials in control and experimental groups were recorded extracellularly. Maximum amplitude and hyperpolarization time and action potential were significantly (p ≤ 0.025) lower in the MF group than in control. However, conduction time, minimum amplitude, depolarization and repolarization times of the action potential was not different between control and MF groups evaluated. In conclusion, 50-1 mT MF caused to decrease amplitude value and hyperpolarization time of action potential in the rat nerve.
Auvinen A., Lahkola A., Tokola K., and Kurttio P. ( 2006) Epidemiologic assessment of cancer risk from mobile phone use: where are we? PIERS Online2: 197-199.
3.
Bailey WH, Nyenhuis JA ( 2005) Threshold for 60 Hz magnetic field stimulation of peripheral nerves in human subjects. Bioelectromagnetics26: 462-468.
4.
Cavopol AV, Wamil AW, Holcomb RR, and McLean MJ ( 1995) Measurement and analysis of static magnetic fields that block action potentials in cultured neurons. Bioelectromagnetics16: 197-206.
5.
Colegrove SL, Albreacht MA, and Friel DD ( 2000) Dissection of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and release fluxes in situ after depeolarization-evoked [Ca2+]i elevations in sympathetic neurons . Journal of General Physiology115: 351-370.
6.
Denac H., Mevissen M., and Scholtysik G. ( 2000) Structure, function, and pharmacology of voltage-gated sodium channels. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology362: 453-479.
7.
Di Loreto S., Falone S., Caracciolo V., Sebastiani P., D’Alessandro A., Mirabilio A., et al. (2009) Fifty hertz extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure elicits redox and trophic response in rat-cortical neurons . Journal of Cellular Physiology219: 334-343.
8.
Elder JA, Chou C., and Morrissey JJ ( 2007) Radiofrequency exposure and human health. PIERS Online3: 149-153.
9.
Goldin AL ( 2003) Mechanisms of sodium channel inactivation. Neurobiology13: 284-290.
10.
Gould JL ( 1984) Magnetic field sensitivity in animals. Annual Review of Physiology46: 585-598.
11.
Icnirp (1998) International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics74: 494-522.
12.
Kovács R., Schuchmann S., Gabriel S., Kann O., Kardos J., and Heinemann U. ( 2002) Free radical-mediated cell damage after experimental status epilepticus in hippocampal slice cultures. Journal of Neurophysiology88: 2909-2918.
13.
Krarup C., Moldovan M (2009) Nerve conduction and excitability studies in peripheral nerve disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology22: 460-466.
14.
Nazıroğlu M. ( 2007) New molecular mechanisms on the activation of TRPM2 channels by oxidative stress and ADP-ribose. Neurochemistry Research32: 1990-2001.
15.
Nazıroğlu M., Gumral N. ( 2009) Modulator effects of selenium and L- carnitine on wireless devices (2.45 GHz) induced oxidative stress and electroencephalography records in brain of rat. International Journal of Radiation Biology85: 680-689.
16.
Nazıroğlu M., Lückhoff A. ( 2008) Effects of antioxidants on calcium influx through TRPM2 channels in transected cells activated by hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Neurology Science270: 152-158.
17.
Nosek TM ( 2004) Membrane transport and bioelectric activity: properties of the typical neuronal action potential., Available at: http://imc.gsm.com/demos/hpdemo/program/section1/1ch4/asdip10f.htm (accessed 27 March 2004).
18.
Nrpb (1983) Revised guidance on acceptable limits of exposure during nuclear magnetic resonance clinical imaging. British Journal of Radiology56: 974.
19.
Persson BRRr, Eberhardt J., Malmgren L., Persson MB, Brun A., and Salford LG ( 2005) Effects of microwaves from GSM mobile phones on the blood-brain barrier and neurons in rat brain. PIERS Online1: 638-641.
20.
Platano D., Mesirca P., Paffi A., Pellegrino M., Liberti M., Apollonio F., et al. (2007) Acute exposure to low-level CW and GSM-modulated 900 MHz radiofrequency does not affect Ba2+ currents through voltage-gated calcium channels in rat cortical neurons. Bioelectromagnetics28: 599-607.
21.
Rosen AD ( 2003) Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics39: 163-173.
22.
Sadafi HA, Mehboodi Z., and Sardari D. ( 2006) A review of the mechanisms of interaction between the extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and human biology. PIERS Online2: 99-103.
23.
See CH, Abd-Alhameed RA, Excell PS, and Zhou D. ( 2008) Microscopic biological cell level model using modified finite-difference time-domain at mobile radio frequencies. PIERS Online4: 6-10.
24.
Simkó M. ( 2007) Cell type specific redox status is responsible for diverse electromagnetic field effects. Current Medical Chemistry14: 1141-1152.
25.
Sun W., Yu Y., Fu Y., Chiang H., Xie H., and Lu D. ( 2002) Effects of power frequency magnetic fields exposure on phosphorylation and enzymatic activity of stress-activated protein kinase and its upstream kinase. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi20: 256-259.
26.
Tenforde YS ( 1991) Biological interactions of extremely-low frequency electric and magnetic fields. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics25: 1-17.
27.
Zhang Y., Ding J., and Duan W. ( 2006) A study of the effects of flux density and frequency of pulsed electromagnetic field on neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Journal of Biological Physics32: 1-9.
