Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) monomers and polymeric MDI (pMDI) are aromatic isocyanates widely used in the production of polyurethanes. These isocyanates can cause occupational asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, as well as contact dermatitis. Skin exposure likely contributes toward initial sensitization but is challenging to monitor and quantitate. In this work, we characterized workers’ personal inhalation and skin exposures to pMDI in a polyurethane fabric coating factory for subsequent health effect studies. Full-shift personal and area air samples were collected from eleven workers in representative job areas daily for 1–2 weeks. Skin exposure to hands was evaluated concomitantly with a newly developed reagent-impregnated cotton glove dosimeter. Samples were analyzed for pMDI by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In personal airborne samples, the concentration of 4,4′-MDI isomer, expressed as total NCO, had a geometric mean (GM) and geometric standard deviation (GSD) of 5.1 and 3.3 ng NCO/m3, respectively (range: 0.5–1862 ng NCO/m3). Other MDI isomers were found at much lower concentrations. Analysis of 4,4′-MDI in the glove dosimeters exhibited much greater exposures (GM: 10 ng/cm2) and substantial variability (GSD: 20 ng NCO/cm2; range: 0–295 ng NCO/cm2). MDI inhalation exposure was well below occupational limits for MDI for all the job areas. However, MDI skin exposure to hands was substantial. These findings demonstrated the potential for substantial isocyanate skin exposure in work settings with very low airborne levels. This exposure characterization should inform future studies that aim to assess the health effects of work exposures to MDI and the effectiveness of protective measures.
AllportDCGilbertDSOuttersideSM (eds) (2003) MDI and TDI: Safety, Health and the Environment: A Source Book and Practical Guide. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2.
BelloAXueYGoreR, et al. (2019) Assessment and control of exposures to polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI) in spray polyurethane foam applicators. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health222(5): 804–815.
3.
BelloAXueYGoreR, et al. (2020) Exposures and urinary biomonitoring of aliphatic isocyanates in construction metal structure coating. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health226: 113495.
4.
BelloDHerrickCASmithTJ, et al. (2007) Skin exposure to isocyanates: reasons for concern. Environmental Health Perspectives115(3): 328–335.
5.
BelloDSmithTJWoskieSR, et al. (2006) An FTIR investigation of isocyanate skin absorption using in vitro guinea pig skin. Journal of Environmental Monitoring8(5): 523–529.
6.
BelloDStreicherRLiuY, et al. (2002) Field comparison of impingers and treated filters for sampling of total aliphatic isocyanates with the MAP reagent. AIHA Journal : A Journal for the Science of Occupational and Environmental Health and Safety63(6): 790–796.
7.
BelloDWoskieSRStreicherRP, et al. (2004) Polyisocyanates in occupational environments: a critical review of exposure limits and metrics. American Journal of Industrial Medicine46(5): 480–491.
8.
DeGroot AC (2008) Patch Testing. Test concentrations and vehicles for 4350 chemicals. Acdegroot publishing Wapserveen The Netherlands. DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.017
9.
DaoABernsteinDI (2018) Occupational exposure and asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology120(5): 468–475.
10.
GeierJAmschlerKClaßenA, et al. (2018) Sensitization to diphenylmethane-diisocyanate isomers by a single accidental exposure. Contact Dermatitis78(1): 90–92.
11.
Global Markets Insights Inc (2022) Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Market Size by Product (Open Cell, Closed Cell), by Application (Residential Walls, Residential Roofing, Commercial Walls, Commercial Roofing), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, MEA) Growth Potential, Price Trends, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2022 – 2028. Report Number GMI2096, Date March 2022. Selbyville, DE, USA: Global Market Insights, Inc. Available at:https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/spray-polyurethane-foam-spf-market?utm_source = globenewswire.com&utm_medium = referral&utm_campaign = Paid_Globnewswire (accessed 10 May 2022).
HamadaHBruzeMZimersonE, et al. (2017) Sensitization and cross-reactivity patterns of contact allergy to diisocyanates and corresponding amines: investigation of diphenylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate, diphenylmethane-4,4′-diamine, dicyclohexylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate, and dicylohexylmethane-4,4′-diamine. Contact Dermatitis77(4): 231–241.
14.
HamlettARyanLSerrano-TrespalaciosP, et al. (2003) Mixed models for assessing correlation in the presence of replication. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association53(4): 442–450.
15.
HarariHBelloDWoskieS, et al. (2016) Development of an interception glove sampler for skin exposures to aromatic isocyanates. Annals of Occupational Hygiene60(9): 1092–1103.
16.
HeederikDHennebergerPKRedlichCA, et al. (2012) Primary prevention: exposure reduction, skin exposure and respiratory protection. European Respiratory Reviews21(124): 112–124.
17.
Henriks-EckermanMLMäkeläEALaitinenJ, et al. (2015) Role of dermal exposure in systemic intake of methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) among construction and boat building workers. Toxicology Letters232(3): 595–600.
18.
HiltonJDearmanRJBasketterDA, et al. (1995) Identification of chemical respiratory allergens: dose-response relationships in the mouse IgE test. Toxicology Methods5(1): 51–60.
19.
HoffmannHDLeiboldEEhnesC, et al. (2010) Dermal uptake and excretion of 14C-toluene diisocyante (TDI) and 14C-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) in male rats Clinical signs and histopathology following dermal exposure of male rats to TDI. Toxicology Letters199(3): 364–371.
20.
HornungRWReedLD (1990) Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene5(1): 46–51.
21.
JonesKJohnsonPDBaldwinPEJ, et al. (2017) Exposure to diisocyanates and their corresponding diamines in seven different workplaces. Annals of Work Exposures and Health61(3): 383–393.
22.
KanervaLLähteenmäkiMTEstlanderT, et al. (1989) Allergic contact dermatitis from isocyanates. In: FroschPDooms-GoossensALachapelleJM, et al. (eds) Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 368–373.
23.
KwonSCSongJKimYK, et al. (2015) Work-related asthma in Korea - Findings from the Korea work-related asthma surveillance (KOWAS) program, 2004-2009. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research7(1): 51–59.
24.
LiljelindINorbergCEgelrudL, et al. (2010) Dermal and inhalation exposure to methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) in iron foundry workers. Annals of Occupational Hygiene54(1): 31–40.
25.
LockeyJERedlichCAStreicherR, et al. (2015) Isocyanates and human health: multistakeholder information needs and research priorities. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine57(1): 44–51.
26.
MäkeläEAHenriks-EckermanMLYlinenK, et al. (2014) Permeation tests of glove and clothing materials against sensitizing chemicals using diphenylmethane diisocyanate as an example. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene58(7): 921–930.
27.
McCleanMDRinehartRDNgoL, et al. (2004) Inhalation and dermal exposure among asphalt paving workers. Annals of Occupational Hygiene48(8): 663–671.
28.
MelletteMPBelloDXueY, et al. (2018) Testing of disposable protective garments against isocyanate permeation from spray polyurethane foam insulation. Annals of Work Exposures and Health62(6): 754–764.
29.
MeredithSKBuglerJClarkRL (2000) Isocyanate exposure and occupational asthma: a case-referent study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine57(12): 830–836.
30.
NIOSH (2003) National institute for occupational safety and health. method 5525, isocyanates, total (MAP). In: Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th edition. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH, Issue 1, 3rd supplement. ed. Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/5525.pdf (accessed 23 April 2022).
OSHA (1975) Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI: 4,4-diphenylmethane Diisocyanate): 29 CFR 1910.1000 Table Z-1. E-CRF. Available at:https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/23 (accessed 30 April 2022).
33.
PauluhnJ (2014) Development of a respiratory sensitization/elicitation protocol of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) in Brown Norway rats to derive an elicitation-based occupational exposure level. Toxicology319: 10–22.
34.
PetsonkELWangMLLewisDM, et al. (2000) Asthma-like symptoms in wood product plant workers exposed to methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. Chest 118(4): 1183–1193. DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1183
35.
PearsonRLLoganPWKoreAM, et al. (2013) Isocyanate exposure assessment combining industrial hygiene methods with biomonitoring for end users of orthopedic casting products. Annals of Occupational Hygiene57(6): 758–765.
36.
PisanielloDLMurialeL (1989) The use of isocyanate paints in auto refinishing—A survey of isocyanate exposures and related work practices in South Australia. Annals of Occupational Hygiene33(4): 563–572.
37.
PollarisLDecaestekerTVan den BrouckeS, et al. (2021) Involvement of innate lymphoid cells and dendritic cells in a mouse model of chemical-induced asthma. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research13(2): 295–311.
38.
PollarisLVan Den BrouckeSDecaestekerT, et al. (2019) Dermal exposure determines the outcome of repeated airway exposure in a long-term chemical-induced asthma-like mouse model. Toxicology421: 84–92.
39.
RattrayNJBothamPAHextPM, et al. (1994) Induction of respiratory hypersensitivity to diphenylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate (MDI) in guinea pigs. Influence of route of exposure. Toxicology88(1–3): 15–30.
40.
RedlichC (2010) Skin exposure and asthma: is there a connection?Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society7(2): 134–137.
41.
RedlichCAHerrickCA (2008) Lung/skin connections in occupational lung disease. Current Opinions on Allergy & Clinical Immunology8(2): 115–119.
42.
StreicherRPRehCMKey-SchwartzRJ, et al. (2000) Determination of airborne isocyanate exposure: considerations in method selection. AIHAJ - American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal61(4): 544–556.
43.
TarloSMLemiereC (2014) Occupational asthma. New England Journal of Medicine370(7): 640–649.
44.
TsuiHCRonsmansSDe SadeleerLJ, et al. (2020) Skin exposure contributes to chemical-induced asthma: what is the evidence? A systematic review of animal models. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research12(4): 579–598.
45.
UlrichH (1997) Chemistry and Technology of Isocyanates. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
46.
VanoirbeekJATarkowskiMCeuppensJL, et al. (2004) Respiratory response to toluene diisocyanate depends on prior frequency and concentration of dermal sensitization in mice. Toxicological Sciences80(2): 310–321.
47.
WisnewskiAVLemusRKarolMH, et al. (1999) Isocyanate-conjugated human lung epithelial cell proteins: a link between exposure and asthma?Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology104(2): 341–347.
48.
WisnewskiAVXuLRobinsonE, et al. (2011) Immune sensitization to methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) resulting from skin exposure: albumin as a carrier protein connecting skin exposure to subsequent respiratory responses. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England)6: 6.
