Repeat Head CT for Neurologically Stable Patients With Mild Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage During Interfacility Transfer and Follow-Up Does Not Alter Patient Care
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2021
Repeat Head CT for Neurologically Stable Patients With Mild Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage During Interfacility Transfer and Follow-Up Does Not Alter Patient Care
To evaluate the impact of repeat head computed tomography (CT) during (1) interfacility transfer and (2) inpatient and/or outpatient follow-up on management, cost-effectiveness, and radiation dose in neurologically stable patients with mild traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH).
Material and Methods:
This is a single-center retrospective study evaluating patients with mild tSAH presenting between January 2017 and July 2019. A total of 101 and 140 patients met the eligibility criteria for the first and second subgroups, respectively. Common inclusion criteria were isolated mild tSAH, Glasgow Coma Scale between 13 and 15, and neurological stability. Additional inclusion criteria for the first subgroup were availability of brain imaging at the outside institution prior to transfer and the second subgroup was the availability of follow-up imaging.
Results:
In the first subgroup, 76.20% of patients had stable SAH, 18.80% had reduced SAH, while 5% had an interval increase in SAH. None required any surgical intervention. Additional per-patient mean radiation exposure was 1.77 ± 0.26 mSv. In the second subgroup, all 140 patients had complete resolution of tSAH. One patient had a new tiny subdural hemorrhage, which subsequently resolved on follow-up. The additional mean radiation exposure was 2.47 ± 1.29 mSv. A total of 256 avoidable CT scans were performed resulting in excess health care costs of about US$531 696.
Conclusion:
In neurologically stable isolated tSAH patients, repeat brain imaging during interfacility transfer and inpatient and/or outpatient follow-up do not alter patient management despite increased health care costs and radiation burden.
WintermarkMSanelliPCAnzaiY, et al.Imaging evidence and recommendations for traumatic brain injury: conventional neuroimaging techniques. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(2):e1–e14. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.014.
2.
StipplerMSmithCMcLeanAR, et al.Utility of routine follow-up head CT scanning after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the literature. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(7):528–532. doi:10.1136/emermed-2011-200162.
3.
JagodaASBazarianJJBrunsJJJr, et al.Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decision making in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(6):714–748. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.021.
4.
JagerTEWeissHBCobenJHPepePE. Traumatic brain injuries evaluated in U.S. emergency departments, 1992-1994. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(2):134–140. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00515.x.
5.
Rutland-BrownWLangloisJAThomasKEXiYL. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(6):544–548.
6.
SmitsMDippelDWJde HaanGG, et al.External validation of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005;294(12):1519–1525. doi:10.1001/jama.294.12.1519.
7.
VernonSAHelmerSDWardJGHaanJM. Computed tomography in trauma patients accepted in transfer: missed injuries and rationale for repeat imaging. Can we do better?Kans J Med. 2019;12(1):7–10.
8.
GuptaRGreerSEMartinED. Inefficiencies in a rural trauma system: the burden of repeat imaging in interfacility transfers. J Trauma. 2010;69(2):253–255. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e4d579.
9.
GatesMMalloryGPlanchardRNothdurftGGraffeoCAtkinsonJ. Triage patterns of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: is referral to a tertiary care center necessary?World Neurosurg. 2017;100:417–423. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.046.
10.
BadjatiaNCarneyNCroccoTJ, et al.Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury 2nd Edition. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12:S1–S52. doi:10.1080/10903120701732052.
VelmahosGCGervasiniAPetrovickL, et al.Routine repeat head CT for minimal head injury is unnecessary. J Trauma. 2006;60(3):494–501. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000203546.14824.0d.
13.
HaleyTGhaemmaghamiVLoftusTGerkinRDSterrettRFerraraJJ. Trauma: the impact of repeat imaging. Am J Surg. 2009;198(6):858–862. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.030.
14.
SungJCSodicksonALedbetterS. Outside CT imaging among emergency department transfer patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6(9):626–632. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2009.04.010.
15.
JosephBAzizHPanditV, et al.A three-year prospective study of repeat head computed tomography in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(1):45–51. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.062.
16.
ChaoAPearlJPerdueP, et al.Utility of routine serial computed tomography for blunt intracranial injury. J Trauma. 2001;51(5):870–876.
17.
CooperSWBetheaKBSkrobutTJ, et al.Management of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage by the trauma service: is repeat CT scanning and routine neurosurgical consultation necessary?Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):e000313. doi:10.1136/tsaco-2019-000313.
18.
NassiriFBadhiwalaJHWitiwCD, et al.The clinical significance of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(4):725–731. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000001617.
19.
BorczukPPennJPeakDChangY. Patients with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage are at low risk for deterioration or neurosurgical intervention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(6):1504–1509. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31829215cf.
20.
QuigleyMRChewBGSwartzCEWilbergerJE. The clinical significance of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):581–584. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d6088.
PhelanHARichterAAScottWW, et al.Does isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage merit a lower intensity level of observation than other traumatic brain injury?J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(20):1733–1736. doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3377.
23.
RubinoSZamanRASturgeCR, et al.Outpatient follow-up of nonoperative cerebral contusion and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: does repeat head CT alter clinical decision-making?J Neurosurg. 2014;121(4):944–949. doi:10.3171/2014.6.
24.
LevyASOrlandoASalottoloKMainsCWBar-OrD. Outcomes of a nontransfer protocol for mild traumatic brain injury with abnormal head computed tomography in a rural hospital setting. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(1-2):e319–e323. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.11.008.
25.
SweeneyTESallesAHarrisOASpainDAStaudenmayerKL. Prediction of neurosurgical intervention after mild traumatic brain injury using the National Trauma Data Bank. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:23–23. doi:10.1186/s13017-015-0017-6.
26.
von der BrelieCSchneegansIvan den BoomLMeierUHedderichJLemckeJ. Impaired coagulation is a risk factor for clinical and radiologic deterioration in patients with traumatic brain injury and isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(2):295–300. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000000722.
27.
PruittPPennJPeakDBorczukP. Identifying patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage at low risk of decompensation who are safe for ED observation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(2):255–259. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.064.
28.
HuynhTJacobsDGDixSSingRFMilesWSThomasonMH. Utility of neurosurgical consultation for mild traumatic brain injury. Am Surg. 2006;72(12):1162–1167.
29.
RosenCBLuyDDDeaneMRScaleaTMSteinTM. Routine repeat head CT may not be necessary for patients with mild TBI. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018;3(1):e000129. doi:10.1136/tsaco-2017-000129.
30.
LinEC. Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(12):1142–1146. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0260.
31.
National Research Council Board on Radiation Effects Research. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII, Phase I, Letter Report (1998). National Academies Press (US); 1998.
32.
BrennerDJHallEJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–2284. doi:10.1056/NEJMra072149.
33.
Smith-BindmanRLipsonJMarcusR, et al.Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078–2086. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427.
34.
Berrington de GonzálezAMaheshMKimKP, et al.Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–2077. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440.
35.
SteinSCFabbriAServadeiF. Routine serial computed tomographic scans in mild traumatic brain injury: when are they cost-effective?J Trauma. 2008;65(1):66–72. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318068d75f.
