Microscale porous membranes are used in a wide range of technical and medical applications such as water treatment, dialysis and in vitro test systems. A promising approach to control membrane properties and overcome limitations of conventional fabrication techniques is given by additive manufacturing (AM). In this study, we designed and printed a microporous membrane via digital light processing and validated its use for biomedical in vitro applications based on the example of a cell culture insert. A multi-layer technique was developed, resulting in an eight-layer membrane with an average pore diameter of 25 µm. Image analyses proved the printing accuracy to be high with small deviations for an increasing number of layers. Permeability tests with brilliant blue FCF (E133, triarylmethane dye) and growth factors comparing the printed to track-etched membranes showed similar transfer dynamics and confirmed sufficient separation properties. Overall, the results showed that printing microporous polymer membranes is possible and highlight the potential of AM for biomedical in vitro applications such as cell culture inserts, scaffolds for tissue engineering or bioreactors.
StamatialisDFPapenburgBJGironésMet al.
Medical applications of membranes: drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering. J Membr Sci2008;
308: 1–34.
2.
BazinetLLamarcheFIppersielD.Bipolar-membrane electrodialysis: applications of electrodialysis in the food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol1998;
9: 107–113.
3.
CabassudCWirthD.Membrane distillation for water desalination: how to choose an appropriate membrane?.Desalination2003;
157: 307–314.
4.
PengPFaneAGLiX.Desalination by membrane distillation adopting a hydrophilic membrane. Desalination2005;
173: 45–54.
5.
SchreiberCAl-ChalabiANATanaseOet al. Grundlagen der Nieren-und Leberdialyse Medizintechnik.
Springer, 2009, pp.1519–1584.
6.
CuiWZhouYChangJ.Electrospun nanofibrous materials for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Sci Technol Adv Mater2016;
11: 014108
7.
ShoichetMS.Polymer scaffolds for biomaterials applications. Macromolecules2010;
43: 581–591.
8.
MikiYOnoKHataSet al.
The advantages of co-culture over mono cell culture in simulating in vivo environment. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol2012;
131: 68–75.
9.
KimMYLiDJPhamLKet al.
Microfabrication of high-resolution porous membranes for cell culture. J Memb Sci2014;
452: 460–469.
10.
LaliaBSKochkodanVHashaikehRet al.
A review on membrane fabrication: structure, properties and performance relationship. Desalination2013;
326: 77–95.
11.
ApelP.Track etching technique in membrane technology. Radiat Meas2001;
34: 559–566.
12.
WendorffJHGreinerAAgarwalS.Electrospinning: materials, processing, and applications.
Weinheim:
Wiley, 2012.
13.
LowZ-XChuaYTRayBMet al.
Perspective on 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to related unconventional fabrication techniques. J Membr Sci2017;
523: 596–613.
14.
PingerCWHellerAASpenceDM.A printed equilibrium dialysis device with integrated membranes for improved binding affinity measurements. Anal Chem2017;
89: 7302–7306.
15.
LiFSmejkalPMacdonaldNPet al.
One-step fabrication of a microfluidic device with an integrated membrane and embedded reagents by multimaterial 3D printing. Anal Chem2017;
89: 4701–4707.
16.
CampbellIBourellDGibsonI.Additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping comes of age. Rapid Prototyp J2012;
18: 255–258.
17.
ZeinIHutmacherDWTanKCet al.
Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials2002;
23: 1169–1185.
18.
TayebiLRasoulianboroujeniMMoharamzadehKet al.
3D-printed membrane for guided tissue regeneration. Mater Biol Appl C2018;
84: 148–158.
19.
RatheeshGVenugopalJRChinappanAet al.
3D fabrication of polymeric scaffolds for regenerative therapy. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2017;
3: 1175–1194.
20.
HellerCSchwentenweinMVargaFet al.
Additive manufacturing technologies for the 3D fabrication of biocompatible and biodegradable photopolymers. MRS Proc2011; 1239
21.
JiangDJengYKonovalovAet al.
Three-dimensional printing of biocompatible scaffolds for tissue engineered constructs. Bull Russ Acad Sci Phys2016;
80: 362–366.
22.
LeeJ-YTanWSAnJet al.
The potential to enhance membrane module design with 3D printing technology. J Membr Sci2016;
499: 480–490.
FemmerTKuehneAJWesslingM.Print your own membrane: direct rapid prototyping of polydimethylsiloxane. Lab Chip2014;
14: 2610–2613.
25.
GuvendirenMMoldeJSoaresRMDet al.
Designing biomaterials for 3D printing.Acs Biomater Sci Eng2016;
2: 1679–1693.
26.
ZhuFFriedrichTNugegodaDet al.
Assessment of the biocompatibility of three-dimensional-printed polymers using multispecies toxicity tests. Biomicrofluidics2015;
9: 061103
27.
OesterreicherAAyalur‐KarunakaranSet al.
Exploring thiol‐yne based monomers as low cytotoxic building blocks for radical photopolymerization. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem2016;
54: 3484–3494.
28.
LeonhardtSKlareMScheerMet al.
Biocompatibility of photopolymers for additive manufacturing. Curr Dir Biomed Eng2016;
2: 113–116.
29.
SchmidRTarauI-SRossiAet al. In vivo-like culture conditions in a bioreactor facilitate improved tissue quality in corneal storage. Biotechnol J 1700344-170034n/a.
30.
KisselKBerberSNockherAet al.
Human platelets target dendritic cell differentiation and production of proinflammatory cytokines. Transfusion2006;
46: 818–827.
31.
DüreggerKPengAEblenkampM.Influence of storage conditions on the release of growth factors in platelet-rich blood derivatives. Curr Dir Biomed Eng2016;
2: 311–314.
32.
KudlowJE.Biology of growth factors: molecular biology, oncogenes, signal transduction, and clinical implications. New York, USA:
Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
