The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc is an essential protective but vulnerable fibrocartilage. Their high mechanical strength is vital in absorbing loads, reducing friction, and protecting the condylar surface. Many diseases can lead to the destruction or degeneration of the mechanical function of the TMJ disc. Unfortunately, conservative treatment is ineffective in restoring the defective mechanical properties of the discs. Tissue engineering has been investigated as a promising alternative treatment approach to approximate the properties of native tissue. However, it is difficult for tissue-engineered discs to obtain sufficient mechanical properties. Several approaches have been proposed to improve the mechanical properties of tissue-engineered constructs. In this review, we summarized the mechanical properties of native TMJ discs and discussed the current mechanical testing methods. We then summarized the current advances in improving the mechanical properties of TMJ disc tissue-engineered constructs. Moreover, existing challenges and outbreak directions are discussed. This review assists future research in better understanding the mechanical properties of both native and tissue-engineered TMJ discs. It provides new insights into future mechanical property enhancement for TMJ disc tissue engineering.
ScapinoRPObrezAGreisingD. Organization and function of the collagen fiber system in the human temporomandibular joint disk and its attachments. Cells Tissues Organs2006; 182: 201–225.
2.
TanakaEDetamoreMSMercuriLG. Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res2008; 87: 296–307.
3.
SheynDMizrahiOBenjaminS, et al.Genetically modified cells in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2010; 62: 683–698. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.01.002.
4.
StratmannUSchaarschmidtKSantamariaP. Morphometric investigation of condylar cartilage and disc thickness in the human temporomandibular joint: significance for the definition of ostearthrotic changes. J Oral Pathol Med1996; 25: 200–205.
5.
HochbergMCAltmanRDAprilKT, et al.American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res2012; 64: 465–474.
6.
GullbrandSESmithLJSmithHE, et al.Promise, progress, and problems in whole disc tissue engineering. JOR Spine2018; 1: e1015. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1015.
7.
De MeurechyNMommaertsMY. Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement systems: a systematic review of their history. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2018; 47: 743–754. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.01.014.
8.
StankovićSVlajkovićSBoškovićM, et al.Morphological and biomechanical features of the temporomandibular joint disc: an overview of recent findings. Arch Oral Biol2013; 58: 1475–1482. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.014.
9.
AhtiainenKMaunoJElläV, et al.Autologous adipose stem cells and polylactide discs in the replacement of the rabbit temporomandibular joint disc. J R Soc Interface2013; 10: 20130287. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0287.
10.
BousnakiMBakopoulouAPapadogianniD, et al.Fibro/chondrogenic differentiation of dental stem cells into chitosan/alginate scaffolds towards temporomandibular joint disc regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med2018; 29: 97. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-018-6109-6.
11.
DetamoreMSAthanasiouKA. Structure and function of the temporomandibular joint disc: implications for tissue engineering. J Oral Maxillofac Surg : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2003; 61: 494–506.
12.
DonahueRPHuJCAthanasiouKA. Remaining hurdles for tissue-engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Trends Mol Med2019; 25: 241–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.12.007.
13.
TanakaEAoyamaJTanakaM, et al.The proteoglycan contents of the temporomandibular joint disc influence its dynamic viscoelastic properties. J Biomed Mater Res2003; 65: 386–392.
14.
FazaeliSGhazanfariSEvertsV, et al.The contribution of collagen fibers to the mechanical compressive properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. Osteoarthritis Cartilage2016; 24: 1292–1301. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.138.
15.
FazaeliSGhazanfariSMirahmadiF, et al.The dynamic mechanical viscoelastic properties of the temporomandibular joint disc: the role of collagen and elastin fibers from a perspective of polymer dynamics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 100: 103406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103406.
16.
DetamoreMSAthanasiouKA. Tensile properties of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomech Eng2003; 125: 558–565.
17.
AlmarzaAJBeanACBaggettLS, et al.Biochemical analysis of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg2006; 44: 124–128.
18.
KuoJZhangLBacroT, et al.The region-dependent biphasic viscoelastic properties of human temporomandibular joint discs under confined compression. J Biomech2010; 43: 1316–1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.020.
19.
KalpakciKNWillardVPWongME, et al.An interspecies comparison of the temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res2011; 90: 193–198. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510381501.
20.
GutmanSKimDTarafderS, et al.Regionally variant collagen alignment correlates with viscoelastic properties of the disc of the human temporomandibular joint. Arch Oral Biol2018; 86: 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.11.002.
21.
MinarelliAMDel Santo JúniorMLibertiEA. The structure of the human temporomandibular joint disc: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Orofac Pain1997; 11.
22.
DetamoreMSOrfanosJGAlmarzaAJ, et al.Quantitative analysis and comparative regional investigation of the extracellular matrix of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Matrix Biol2005; 24: 45–57.
23.
WillardVPKalpakciKNReimerAJ, et al.The regional contribution of glycosaminoglycans to temporomandibular joint disc compressive properties. J Biomech Eng2012; 134: 011011. DOI: 10.1115/1.4005763.
24.
KuoJZhangLBacroT, et al.The region-dependent biphasic viscoelastic properties of human temporomandibular joint discs under confined compression. J Biomech2010; 43: 1316-1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.020.
25.
YaoHJustizM-AFlaglerD, et al.Effects of swelling pressure and hydraulic permeability on dynamic compressive behavior of lumbar annulus fibrosus. Ann Biomed Eng2002; 30: 1234–1241.
26.
SoltzMAAteshianGA. Interstitial fluid pressurization during confined compression cyclical loading of articular cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng2000; 28: 150–159.
27.
SniderGRLomakinJSinghM, et al.Regional dynamic tensile properties of the TMJ disc. J Dent Res2008; 87: 1053–1057.
28.
MatuskaAMMullerSDolwickMF, et al.Biomechanical and biochemical outcomes of porcine temporomandibular joint disc deformation. Arch Oral Biol2016; 64: 72–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.01.003.
29.
WrightGJCoombsMCHepferRG, et al.Tensile biomechanical properties of human temporomandibular joint disc: effects of direction, region and sex. J Biomech2016; 49: 3762–3769. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.09.033.
30.
Guerrero CotaJMLealeDMArziB, et al.Regional and disease-related differences in properties of the equine temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomech2019; 82: 54–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.017.
31.
TanakaEvan EijdenT. Biomechanical behavior of the temporomandibular joint disc. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med2003; 14: 138–150.
32.
TengSXuYChengM, et al.Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of temporomandibular joint discs in dogs: 2. Tensile mechanical properties of the discs. J Craniomandib Disord1991; 5: 107–114.
33.
AllenKDAthanasiouKA. Tissue Engineering of the TMJ disc: a review. Tissue Eng2006; 12: 1183–1196.
34.
TanakaEDetamoreMSTanimotoK, et al.Lubrication of the temporomandibular joint. Ann Biomed Eng2008; 36: 14–29.
35.
TanneKTanakaESakudaM. The elastic modulus of the temporomandibular joint disc from adult dogs. J Dent Res1991; 70: 1545–1548.
36.
TanakaEShibaguchiTTanakaM, et al.Viscoelastic properties of the human temporomandibular joint disc in patients with internal derangement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2000; 58.
37.
BeattyMWBrunoMJIwasakiLR, et al.Strain rate dependent orthotropic properties of pristine and impulsively loaded porcine temporomandibular joint disk. J Biomed Mater Res2001; 57: 25–34.
38.
TanakaESasakiATahminaK, et al.Mechanical properties of human articular disk and its influence on TMJ loading studied with the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil2001; 28: 273–279.
39.
TanakaETanakaMHattoriY, et al.Biomechanical behaviour of bovine temporomandibular articular discs with age. Arch Oral Biol2001; 46.
40.
MatuskaAMMullerSDolwickMF, et al.Biomechanical and biochemical outcomes of porcine temporomandibular joint disc deformation. Arch Oral Biol2016; 64: 72-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.01.003.
41.
LegemateKTarafderSJunY, et al.Engineering human TMJ discs with protein-releasing 3D-printed scaffolds. J Dent Res2016; 95: 800–807. DOI: 10.1177/0022034516642404.
42.
LabusKMKuiperJPRawlinsonJ, et al.Mechanical characterization and viscoelastic model of the ovine temporomandibular joint Disc in indentation, uniaxial tension, and biaxial tension. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2021; 116: 104300. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104300.
43.
GutmanSKimDTarafderS, et al.Regionally variant collagen alignment correlates with viscoelastic properties of the disc of the human temporomandibular joint. Arch Oral Biol2018; 86: 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.11.002.
44.
MacBarbRFChenALHuJC, et al.Engineering functional anisotropy in fibrocartilage neotissues. Biomaterials2013; 34: 9980–9989. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.026.
45.
WangXDCuiSJLiuY, et al.Deterioration of mechanical properties of discs in chronically inflamed TMJ. J Dent Res2014; 93: 1170–1176. DOI: 10.1177/0022034514552825.
46.
VapniarskyNAryaeiAArziB, et al.The yucatan minipig temporomandibular joint disc structure-function relationships support its suitability for human comparative studies. Tissue Eng C Methods2017; 23: 700–709. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0149.
47.
FazaeliSMirahmadiFEvertsV, et al.Alteration of structural and mechanical properties of the temporomandibular joint disc following elastase digestion. J Biomed Mater Res B2020; 108: 3228–3240. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34660.
48.
WillardVPKalpakciKNReimerAJ, et al.The regional contribution of glycosaminoglycans to temporomandibular joint disc compressive properties. J Biomech Eng2012; 134: 011011. DOI: 10.1115/1.4005763.
49.
del PozoRTanakaETanakaM, et al.The regional difference of viscoelastic property of bovine temporomandibular joint disc in compressive stress-relaxation. Med Eng Phys2002; 24: 165–171.
50.
TanakaEHiroseMYamanoE, et al.Age-associated changes in viscoelastic properties of the bovine temporomandibular joint disc. Eur J Oral Sci2006; 114: 70–73.
51.
AllenKDAthanasiouKA. A surface-regional and freeze-thaw characterization of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Ann Biomed Eng2005; 33: 951–962.
52.
FernándezPJesús LamelaMRamosA, et al.The region-dependent dynamic properties of porcine temporomandibular joint disc under unconfined compression. J Biomech2013; 46: 845–848. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.035.
53.
TanakaETanakaMMiyawakiY, et al.Viscoelastic properties of canine temporomandibular joint disc in compressive load-relaxation. Arch Oral Biol1999; 44: 1021–1026.
54.
TanakaEKikuzakiMHanaokaK, et al.Dynamic compressive properties of porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Eur J Oral Sci2003; 111: 434–439.
55.
LumpkinsSBMcFetridgePS. Regional variations in the viscoelastic compressive properties of the temporomandibular joint disc and implications toward tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res2009; 90: 784–791. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32148.
56.
JuranCMDolwickMFMcFetridgePS. Engineered microporosity: enhancing the early regenerative potential of decellularized temporomandibular joint discs. Tissue Eng2015; 21: 829-839. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0250.
57.
BarrientosEPelayoFTanakaE, et al.Dynamic and stress relaxation properties of the whole porcine temporomandibular joint disc under compression. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2016; 57: 109–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.12.003.
58.
WuYCisewskiSEWeiF, et al.Fluid pressurization and tractional forces during TMJ disc loading: a biphasic finite element analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res2017; 20(Suppl 1): 151–156. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12147.
59.
BarrientosEPelayoFTanakaE, et al.Viscoelastic properties of the central region of porcine temporomandibular joint disc in shear stress-relaxation. J Biomech2019; 93: 126–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.06.023.
60.
IatridisJCJCap GwynnI. Mechanisms for mechanical damage in the intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus. J Biomech2004; 37: 1165–1175.
61.
JuranCMDolwickMFMcFetridgePS. Shear mechanics of the TMJ disc: relationship to common clinical observations. J Dent Res2013; 92: 193–198. DOI: 10.1177/0022034512468749.
62.
WuYKuoJWrightGJ, et al.Viscoelastic shear properties of porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Orthod Craniofac Res2015; 18(Suppl 1): 156–163. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12088.
63.
TanakaEHanaokaKvan EijdenT, et al.Dynamic shear properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res2003; 82: 228–231.
64.
Alkhiary YMNassef TMYassine IA, et al.A new numerical model to analyze stress distribution of TMJ disc from 2-D MRI scans. Adv Comput2012; 2: 66–75. DOI: 10.5923/j.ac.20120205.01.
65.
KoolstraJHTanakaEVan EijdenTMGJ. Viscoelastic material model for the temporomandibular joint disc derived from dynamic shear tests or strain-relaxation tests. J Biomech2007; 40: 2330–2334.
66.
TanakaEKawaiNHanaokaK, et al.Shear properties of the temporomandibular joint disc in relation to compressive and shear strain. J Dent Res2004; 83: 476–479.
67.
AlmarzaAJAthanasiouKA. Seeding techniques and scaffolding choice for tissue engineering of the temporomandibular joint disk. Tissue Eng2004; 10: 1787–1795.
68.
LumpkinsSBPierreNMcFetridgePS. A mechanical evaluation of three decellularization methods in the design of a xenogeneic scaffold for tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Acta Biomater2008; 4: 808–816. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.01.016.
69.
DetamoreMSAthanasiouKA. Use of a rotating bioreactor toward tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Tissue Eng2005; 11: 1188–1197.
70.
AllenKDAthanasiouKA. Scaffold and growth factor selection in temporomandibular joint disc engineering. J Dent Res2008; 87: 180–185.
71.
HagandoraCKGaoJWangY, et al.Poly (glycerol sebacate): a novel scaffold material for temporomandibular joint disc engineering. Tissue Eng2013; 19: 729–737. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0304.
72.
FranciscoLMouraCVianaT, et al.Poly(ɛ-caprolactone) and polyethylene glycol diacrylate-based scaffolds for TMJ bioengineered disc implants. Procedia Manuf2017; 12: 291–297, DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.032.
73.
MouraCTrindadeDVieiraM, et al.Multi-material implants for temporomandibular joint disc repair: tailored additive manufacturing production. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020; 8: 342. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00342.
74.
BrownBNChungWLAlmarzaAJ, et al.Inductive, scaffold-based, regenerative medicine approach to reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint disk. J Oral Maxillofac Surg : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2012; 70: 2656–2668. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.12.030.
75.
MatuskaAMMcFetridgePS. Laser micro-ablation of fibrocartilage tissue: effects of tissue processing on porosity modification and mechanics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2018; 106: 1858–1868. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33997.
76.
BrowningMBCereceresSNLuongPT, et al.Determination of the in vivo degradation mechanism of PEGDA hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res2014; 102: 4244–4251. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35096.
77.
MatuskaAMDolwickMFMcFetridgePS. Approaches to improve integration and regeneration of an ex vivo derived temporomandibular joint disc scaffold with variable matrix composition. J Mater Sci Mater Med2018; 29: 152. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-018-6164-z.
78.
LiangJYiPWangX, et al.Acellular matrix hydrogel for repair of the temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2020; 108: 2995–3007. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34629.
79.
AlmarzaAJAthanasiouKA. Effects of initial cell seeding density for the tissue engineering of the temporomandibular joint disc. Ann Biomed Eng2005; 33: 943–950.
80.
DetamoreMSAthanasiouKA. Evaluation of three growth factors for TMJ disc tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng2005; 33: 383–390.
81.
WangLSeshareddyKWeissML, et al.Effect of initial seeding density on human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells for fibrocartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng2009; 15: 1009–1017. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0012.
82.
JuranCMDolwickMFMcFetridgePS. Engineered microporosity: enhancing the early regenerative potential of decellularized temporomandibular joint discs. Tissue Eng2015; 21: 829–839. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0250.
83.
MakrisEAGomollAHMalizosKN, et al.Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage. Nat Rev Rheumatol2015; 11: 21–34. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157.
84.
AthanasiouKAResponteDJBrownWE, et al.Harnessing biomechanics to develop cartilage regeneration strategies. J Biomech Eng2015; 137: 020901. DOI: 10.1115/1.4028825.
85.
LeeJKHuweLWPaschosN, et al.Tension stimulation drives tissue formation in scaffold-free systems. Nat Mater2017; 16: 864–873. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4917.
86.
MartinIObradovicBTreppoS, et al.Modulation of the mechanical properties of tissue engineered cartilage. Biorheology2000; 37: 141–147.
87.
Vunjak-NovakovicGObradovicBMartinI, et al.Bioreactor studies of native and tissue engineered cartilage. Biorheology2002; 39: 259–268.
