This study investigates the structure of Struckman-Johnson and Struckman-Johnson's Male Rape Myth Scale, examines gender differences in rape myth acceptance, and explores the underlying ideologies that facilitate male rape myth acceptance. A three-factor model, with rape myths regarding Trauma, Blame, and Denial as separate subscales, is the best fitting solution. However, the results indicate that additional scale development and validity tests are necessary. In exploratory analyses, men are more accepting of male rape myths than are women. Benevolent sexism toward men and acceptance of interpersonal violence are strong predictors of male rape myth acceptance for both men and women. Thus, the attitudes that facilitate rape myth acceptance against men appear to be similar to those that facilitate rape myth acceptance against women. Suggestions for future scale development are outlined and theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.
Abrams, D., Viki, G.T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
2.
Bentler, P. (1998). EQS 5.7b (Multivariate Software, Inc.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
5.
Campbell, R., & Johnson, C.R. (1997). Police officers' perceptions of rape: Is there consistency between state law and individual beliefs? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 255-274.
6.
Chapleau, K.M., Oswald, D.L., & Russell, B.L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131-136.
7.
Clements-Schreiber, M.E., & Rempel, J.K. (1995). Women's acceptance of stereotypes about male sexuality: Correlations with strategies to influence reluctant partners. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 4, 223-231.
8.
Du Mont, J., Miller, K., & Myhr, T.L. (2003). The role of "real rape" and "real victim" stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466-486.
9.
Frohmann, L. (1991). Discrediting victims' allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems , 38, 213-226.
10.
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
11.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
12.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 21, 119-136.
13.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519-536.
14.
Goyer, P.F., & Eddleman, H.C. (1984). Same-sex rape of nonincarcerated men. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 576-579.
15.
Groth, A.N., & Burgess, A.W. (1980). Male rape: Offenders and victims. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 806-810.
16.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
17.
Koss, M.P. (2000). Shame, blame, and community: Justice responses to violence against women. American Psychologist, 55, 1332-1343.
18.
Koss, M.P., Gidycz, C.A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization on a national sample of students in higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
19.
Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
20.
Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
21.
McDonald, R., & Ho, M.R. (2002). Principles and practices in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
22.
Mezey, G., & King, M. (1989). The effects of sexual assault on men: A survey of 22 victims. Psychological Medicine, 19, 205-209.
23.
Oswald, D.L., & Russell, B.L. (2006). Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: The role of initiator gender and tactics. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 87-95.
24.
Payne, D.L., Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
25.
Pino, N.W., & Meier, R.F. (1999). Gender differences in rape reporting. Sex Roles, 40, 979-990.
26.
Russell, B.L., & Oswald, D.L. (2002). Sexual coercion and victimization of college men: The role of love styles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 17, 273-285.
27.
Smith, R.E., Pine, C.J., & Hawley, M.E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101-112.
28.
Stermac, L., Del Bove, G., & Addison, M. (2004). Stranger and acquaintance sexual assault of adult males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 901-915.
29.
Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27, 85-100.
30.
Ullman, J.B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In B. Tabachnick & L. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 709-812). New York: HarperCollins .
31.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2003). 2002 national crime victimization statistics. Retrieved October 28, 2004, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/abstract/cvus/index.htm
32.
Viki, G.T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations . Sex Roles, 47, 289-293.
33.
Viki, G.T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length . Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295-303.
