Sexual harassment has been investigated mostly in developed countries. The authors examined frequency rates and consequences of sexual harassment among female domestic workers in Brazil. Twenty-six percent had been sexually harassed at work during the past year. Live-in workers were at significantly greater risk for experiencing sexual harassment than those residing in their own homes, when controlling for participants' age, race, and social class. Women residing in their employers' residences used more alcohol and drugs than their counterparts. Harassed women had significantly higher self-esteem impairment and anxiety and depression than nonharassed women. Nonharassed women residing in their own homes had the best physical well-being. Concerning participants' worst sexually harassing experiences, the perpetrators were likely to be men (75%), who also engaged in more severe types of sexual harassment than female perpetrators. The emotional reactions to such incidents were significantly more negative when perpetrated by men than by women. Implications for foreign in-home workers employed by Europeans and North Americans are discussed.
Arvey, R.D., & Cavanaugh, M.A. (1995). Using surveys to assess the prevalence of sexual harassment: Some methodological problems. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 39-52.
2.
Assédio sexual com jeitinho bem brasileiro [Sexual harassment à la Brazil] . (1995, February 15). Veja, pp. 80-85.
3.
Baldwin, J., & DeSouza, E. (2001). Modelo de Maria and machismo: The social construction of gender in Brazil. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 35, 9-29.
4.
Barling, J., Rogers, A.G., & Kelloway, E.K. (2001). Behind closed doors: In-home workers' experience of sexual harassment and workplace violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 255-269.
5.
Berdahl, J.L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426-436.
6.
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1993). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (3rd ed., pp. 115-160). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Social Research.
7.
Buchanan, N.T. (2005). The nexus of race and gender domination: Racialized sexual harassment of African American women. In J. E. Gruber & P. Morgan (Eds.), In the company of men: Male dominance and sexual harassment (pp. 294-320). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
8.
Buchanan, N.T., & Ormerod, A.J. (2002). Racialized sexual harassment in the lives of AfricanAmerican women. Women & Therapy, 25, 107-124.
9.
Cleveland, J.N., & Kerst, M.E. (1993). Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An underarticulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 42, 49-67.
10.
Código Penal Brasileiro [Brazilian Penal Code]. (2001). Lei 10.224, Art. 216-A.
11.
Cortina, L.M., Fitzgerald, L.F., & Drasgow, F. (2002). Contextualizing Latina experiences of sexual harassment: Preliminary tests of a structural model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 295-311.
12.
Cortina, L.M., Swan, S., Fitzgerald, L.F., & Waldo, C. (1998). Sexual harassment and assault: Chilling the climate for women in academia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 419-441.
13.
DeSouza, E., & Fansler, A.G. (2003). Contrapower sexual harassment: A survey of students and faculty members. Sex Roles, 48, 529-542.
14.
DeSouza, E., & Solberg, J. (2003). Incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment across cultures. In M. Paludi & C. A. Paludi, Jr. (Eds.), Academic and workplace sexual harassment: A handbook of cultural, social science, management, and legal perspectives (pp. 3-30). Westport, CT: Praeger.
15.
DeSouza, E.R., Baldwin, J., Koller, S.H., & Narvaz, M. (2004). A Latin American perspective on the study of gender . In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 41-67). Westport, CT : Praeger.
16.
DeSouza, E.R., Pryor, J.B., Ribeiro, J., Mello, J., & Camino, C. (2004). Female nurses' and educators' reactions to sexual harassment charges: A cross-cultural perspective. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 38, 31-38.
17.
Fitzgerald, L.F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C.L., Gelfand, M.J., & Magley, V.J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
18.
Fitzgerald, L.F., Gelfand, M.J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425-445.
19.
Fitzgerald, L.F., Magley, V.J., Drasgow, F., & Waldo, C.R. (1999). Measuring sexual harassment in the military: The Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ-DoD). Military Psychology , 11, 243-263.
20.
Fitzgerald, L.F., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., et al. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.
21.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Magley, V. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5-28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
Franke, K.M. (1997). What's wrong with sexual harassment? Stanford Law Review, 49, 691-772.
23.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo. (2005, June 30). Mapa do assédio [Map of harassment]. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.agencia.fapesp.br/materia/3901/especiais/mapa-do-assedio.htm
24.
Gelfand, M., Fitzgerald, L., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164-177.
25.
Gutek, B.A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (n.d.). IBGE. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/default.php
27.
Lim, S., & Cortina, L.M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 483-496.
28.
Minc, C. (2001). Assédio sexual [Sexual harassment]. In R. M. Muraro & A. B. Puppin (Eds.), Mulher, gênero e sociedade [Woman, gender and society] (pp. 64-72). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Relume Dumará.
29.
Murphy, K.R., & Myors, B. (2004). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
30.
Murrell, A.J. (1996). Sexual harassment and women of color: Issues, challenges, and future directions. In M. S. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies (pp. 51-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Plamplona, F.R. (2001). O assédio sexual na relação de emprego [Sexual harassment in work settings]. São Paulo, Brazil: LTR.
32.
Raver, J.L., & Gelfand, M. (2005). Beyond the individual victim: Linking sexual harassment, team processes, and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 387-400.
33.
Robins, R.W., Hendin, H.M., & Trzesniewski, K.H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151-161.
34.
Rosenberg, M. (1986). Conceiving the self. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
35.
Schneider, K.T., Hitlan, R.T., & Radhakrishnan, P. (2000). An examination of the nature and correlates of ethnic harassment experiences in multiple contexts . Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 3-12.
36.
Schneider, K.T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 401-415.
37.
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O.S., Lancaster, A.R., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (2002). Toward standardized measurement of sexual harassment: Shortening the SEQ-DoD using item response theory. Military Psychology, 14, 49-72.
38.
Texeira, M.T. (2002). "Who protects and serves me?" A case study of sexual harassment in one U.S. law enforcement agency. Gender & Society, 16, 524-545.
39.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981 ). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem?Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
40.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988 ). Sexual harassment in the federal government: An update. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
41.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995 ). Sexual harassment in the federal government: Trends, progress, continuing challenges. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42.
Veit, C.T., & Ware, J.E., Jr. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730-742.
43.
Wasti, S.A., Bergman, M.E., Glomb, T.M., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology , 85, 766-778.
44.
Welsh, S., Carr, J., MacQuarrie, B., & Huntley, A. (2006). "I'm not thinking of it as sexual harassment": Understanding harassment across race and citizenship. Gender & Society, 20, 87-107.
45.
Willness, C.R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60, 127-162.
46.
Yoder, J.D., & Aniakudo, P. (1995). The responses of African American women firefighters to gender harassment at work. Sex Roles, 32, 125-137.
