Our research, based on symbolic interaction, was designed to investigate customer-salesperson interactions as a function of unmanipulated customer dress within retail settings using fieldwork. Th rough structured observations in three apparel stores for large size women, we rated customers' dress and friendliness of salespeople and promptness of service. MANOVA results showed that both friendliness and promptness of service were affected by customer dress. Considering the increasing importance of service quality in the retail setting, salespeople need to be trained to be friendly to all customers regardless of customers' dress. In addition, retailers may want to educate salespeople on stereotypes commonly associated with customers' dress and advise them not to rely on such stereotypes. Sales-people need to be alert and conscious of their behaviors in service encounters.
Ainscough, T., & Motley, C. (2000). Will you help me please? The effects of race, gender, and manner of dress on retail service. Marketing Letters, 11(2), 129-136.
2.
Babin, B. J., Boles, J. S., & Darden, W. R. (1995). Salesperson stereotypes, customer emotions, and their impact on information processing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 94-105.
3.
Baker, J. (1986). The role of the environment in marketing services: The consumer perspective. In J. A. Czepeil, C. A. Congram & J. Shanhan (Eds.), The service challenge: Integrating for competitive advantage (pp. 79-84). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and methodEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Buckley, H. M., & Haefner, J. E. (1984). The physical attractiveness stereotype using dress as a facilitator. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 8, 351-358.
6.
Charon, J. M. (1992). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
7.
Davis, F. (1985). Clothing and fashion as communication. Symbolic Interaction, 5, 11-126.
8.
Duffy, D. (2003). Internal and external factors which affect customer loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(5), 480-485.
9.
Ellison, S. (2002, June 21). Obese America: Retailer bets super-size women will buy clothes that fit. Wall Street Journal, pp. B.1-B.1.
10.
Evans, F. (1963). Selling as a dyadic relationship-A new approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 6(2), 76-76.
11.
Forsythe, S., Drake, M., & Cox, C. (1984). Dress as an influence on the perceptions of management characteristics in women. Home Economics Research Journal, 13(2), 112-121.
12.
Fussell, P. (1983). Class: A guide though the American status systemNew York: Summit Books.
13.
Krapfel, R. E. (1988). Customer complaint and salesperson response: The effect of the communication source. Journal of Retailing, 64(2), 181-198.
14.
Lapitsky, M., & Smith, C. M. (1981). Impact of clothing on impressions of personal characteristics and writing ability. Home Economics Research Journal, 9, 327-335.
15.
Lennon, S. J. (1990). Effects of clothing attractiveness on perceptions. Home Economics Research Journal, 18, 303-310.
16.
Lennon, S. J., & Davis, L. L. (1989). Customer service as a function of customer appearance and salesperson goals. Home Economics Forum, 9, 9-11, 18-18.
17.
Leung, C., & Fung, M. W. (1996). Assessing perceived service quality of casual-wear chain stores. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 1(1), 26-49.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-37.
20.
Pauley, L. L. (1988). Customer weight as a variable in salesperson's response time. Journal of Social Psychology, 129(5), 713-714.
21.
Plus-size calls for stylish selling. (1998). Discount Store News, 37(22), 25-27.
22.
Plus-size sales on the rebound. (2004, May). DSN Retailing Today, 43(9), 39-41.
23.
Regan, P., & Llamas, V. (2002). Customer service as a function of shopper's attire. Psychological Reports, 90, 203-204.
24.
Reynolds, K., & Arnold, M. (2000). Customer loyalty to the salesperson and the store: Examining relationship customers in an upscale retail context. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 20(2), 89-98.
25.
Roach-Higgins, M., & Eicher, J. B. (1992). Dress and identity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(4), 1-8.
26.
Rosencranz, M. L. (1962). Clothing symbolism. Journal of Home Economics, 54, 18-22.
27.
Rudie, M., & Wansley, H. (1985). The Merril Lynch Quality Program. In T. Block, G. Upah, & V. Zeithaml (Eds.), Service marketing in a changing environmentChicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
28.
Scardino, E. (2003, November). Plus-size update: Career looks pump up plus. DSN Retailing Today, 42(21), 37-37.
29.
Seckler, V. (2003, October 8). Fashion missing sizable segment. WWD: Women's Wear Daily, 186(74), 16-16.
30.
Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985). A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 99-111.
31.
Stead, B. A., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1986). Service priority in department stores: The effect of customer gender and dress. Sex Roles, 15, 601-611.
32.
Stone, G. P. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 86-118). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
33.
Taylor, S., & Baker, T. (1994). As assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70(2), 163-178.
34.
Thinking big. (2001, July). Chain Store Age, pp. 47-50.
35.
Weitzman, J. (2004, March 19). Lane Bryant paces Charming quarter. WWD: Women's Wear Daily, 187(58), 14-14.
36.
Westbrook, R. A. (1981). Sources of consumer satisfaction with retail outlets. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 68-85.
37.
Woman with a large power. (1989, March). Nation's Business, 77(3), 71-71.
38.
Workman, J. E., & Johnson, K. K. P. (1989). The role of clothing in extended inferences. Home Economics Research Journal, 18(2), 164-169.
