Some sex offender registration and notification (SORN) policies subject all registered sex offenders to Internet notification. The present study examined the effects of one such broad notification policy on sex crime recidivism. Secondary data were analyzed for a sample of 6,064 male offenders convicted of at least one sex crime between 1990 and 2004. Across a mean follow-up of 8.4 years, 490 (8%) offenders had new sex crime charges and 299 (5%) offenders had new sex crime convictions. Cox’s relative risks and competing risks models estimated the influence of registration status on risk of sexual recidivism while controlling for time at risk. Registration status did not predict recidivism in any model. These results cast doubt on the effectiveness of broad SORN policies in preventing repeat sexual assault. Policy implications, particularly with respect to the federal Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, which requires broad notification, are discussed.
Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stageberg, P. ( 2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights.
2.
Anderson, A.L., & Sample, L. ( 2008). Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review , 19, 371-396.
3.
Beck, V.S., & Travis, L.F. ( 2004). Sex offender notification and protective behavior. Violence and Victims, 19, 289-302.
4.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994 (No. NCJ 198281) . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Cox, D.R. ( 1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, 187-220.
6.
Duwe, G., & Donnay, W. ( 2008). The impact of Megan’s Law on sex offender recidivism: The Minnesota experience. Criminology, 46, 411-446.
7.
Florida Senate. ( 2008). Fiscal, policy, and legal considerations regarding state compliance with the Adam Walsh Act [Electronic Version]. Retrieved December 4, 2008, from www.flsenate.gov/data/Publications/2009/Senate/reports/interim_reports/pdf/2009-312cj.pdf
8.
Freeman, N.J., & Sandler, J.C. ( 2009). The Adam Walsh Act: A false sense of security or an effective public policy initiative?Criminal Justice Policy Review. Prepublished June 25, 2009; DOI: 10.1177/0887403409338565
9.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. ( 1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575-607.
10.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
11.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
12.
Hanson, R.K., Morton, K.E., & Harris, A.J.R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 154-166.
13.
Klein, J.P., & Moeschberger, M.L. (2003). Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer.
14.
LaFond, J.Q. ( 2005). Preventing sexual violence: How society should cope with sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
Letourneau, E.J., & Armstrong, K.S. (2008). Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 393-408.
16.
Levenson, J.S., Brannon, Y., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. ( 2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 1-25.
17.
Levenson, J.S., & D’Amora, D.A. (2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The Emperor’s New Clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 168-199.
18.
Lieb, R., & Nunlist, C. ( 2008). Community notification as viewed by Washington’s Citizens: A ten-year follow-up (No. 08-03-1101). Olympia : Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
19.
Logan, W.A. ( 2009). Knowledge as power: Criminal registration and community notification laws in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Press.
20.
McManus, R. ( 2007). South Carolina criminal and juvenile justice trends: 2007. Blythewood: South Carolina Department of Public Safety.
21.
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. ( 2009). Registered sex offenders in the United States. Retrieved November 10, 2009 from http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/sex-offender-map.pdf
22.
Prentice, R.L., & Breslow, N.E. ( 1978). Retrospective studies and failure time models. Biometrika, 65, 153-158.
23.
Prescott, J.J., & Rockoff, J.E. ( 2008). Do Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws affect criminal behavior?(NBER Working Paper No. 13803, 3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Papers, University of Michigan Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 08-006). Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1100663
24.
Sandler, J.C., Freeman, N.J., & Socia, K.M. ( 2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 14, 284-302.
25.
Satagopan, J.J., Ben-Porat, L., Berwick, M., Robson, M., Kutler, D., & Auerbach, A.D. (2004). A note on competing risks in survival data analyses. British Journal of Cancer, 91, 1229-1235.
26.
Schram, D., & Milloy, C.D. ( 1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia: Washington Institute for Public Policy.
27.
Scrucca, L., Santucci, A., & Aversa, F. ( 2007). Competing risk analysis using R: An easy guide for clinicians Bone Marrow Transplantation, 40, 381-387.
28.
Simon, J., & Leon, C. ( 2008). The third wave: American sex offender policies since the 1990s. In S. G. Shoham, O. Beck & M. Kett (Eds.), International handbook of penology and criminal justice (pp. 733-754). Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Press.
29.
Terry, K.J., & Furlong, J.S. ( 2004). Sex offender registration and community notification: A "Megan’s Law" sourcebook. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
30.
Therneau, T.M., & Grambsch, P.M. (2000). Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model. New York: Springer.
31.
Vasquez, B.E., Maddan, S., & Walker, J.T. ( 2008). The influence of sex offender registration and notification laws in the United States. Crime and Delinquency, 54, 175-192.
32.
Vermont Joint Fiscal Office. (2008). Cost associated with Vermont complying with Sex Offender Registration Act (SORNA) and Jessica’s Law [Electronic Version]. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.leg.state.vt.us/JFO/
33.
Veysey, B., Zgoba, K., & Dalessandro, M. (2009). A preliminary step towards evaluating the impact of Megan’s Law: A trend analysis of sexual offenses in New Jersey from 1985 to 2005. Justice Research and Policy , 10(2), 1-18.
34.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. ( 2005). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Did community notification influence recidivism?Olympia, WA: Author.
35.
Zevitz, R.G. ( 2006). Sex offender community notification: Its role in recidivism and offender reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 193-208.
36.
Zgoba, K., Witt, P., Dalessandro, M., & Veysey, B. ( 2009). Megan’s Law: Assessing the practical and monetary efficacy [Electronic Version]. Retrieved February 8, 2009, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/225370.pdf
