Does Local Firm Ownership Matter?

Abstract

A data set for U.S. counties that includes residence status of firm owners is used to assess whether per capita density of locally owned businesses affects local economic growth, compared with nonlocal ownership. The database also permits stratification of firms across different employment size categories. Economic growth models that control for other relevant factors reveal a positive relationship between density of locally owned firms and per capita income growth but only for small (10-99 employees) firms, whereas the density of large (more than 500 workers) firms not owned locally has a negative effect. These results provide strong evidence that local ownership matters for economic growth but only in the small size category. Results are robust across rural and urban counties.

Keywords

firm size firm ownership locus economic growth

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acs, Z. , & Armington, C. ( 2006). Entrepreneurship, geography, and American economic growth . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Birch, D. ( 1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York, NY: Free Press.

Bonanno, A. , & Lopez, R.A. ( 2008). Wal-Mart’s monopsony power in local labor markets (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/6219/2/469304.pdf

Carlton, D.W. ( 1983). The location and employment choices of new firms: An econometric model with discrete and continuous endogenous variables. Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 440-449.

Glaeser, E. , Rosenthal, S. , & Strange, W. ( 2010). Urban economics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 1-14.

Goetz, S. , Deller, S. , & Harris, T. ( 2009). Targeted regional economic development: Introduction and overview. In S. Goetz , S. Deller , & T. Harris (Eds.), Targeting regional economic development (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Routledge.

Goetz, S. , & Rupasingha, A. (2006). Wal-Mart and social capital . American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 1304-1310.

Goetz, S.J. , & Shrestha, S.S. (2009). Explaining self-employment success and failure: Wal-Mart vs. Starbucks or Schumpeter vs. Putnam. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 22-38.

Goetz, S.J. , & Swaminathan, H. (2006). Wal-Mart and family poverty in US counties. Social Sciences Quarterly, 83, 211-225.

10.

Higgins, M. , Levy, D. , & Young, A. ( 2006). Growth and convergence across the United States: Evidence from county-level data. Review of Economics and Statistics , 88, 671-681.

11.

Kolko, J. , & Neumark, D. ( 2010). Does local business ownership insulate cities from economic shocks? Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 103-115.

12.

Loveridge, S. , & Nizalov, D. ( 2007). Operationalizing the entrepreneurial pipeline theory: An empirical assessment of the optimal size distribution of local firms. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 244-262.

13.

Michelacci, C. , & Silva, O. ( 2007). Why so many local entrepreneurs. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 615-633.

14.

Neumark, D. , Wall, B. , & Zhang, J. ( 2011). Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 16-29.

15.

Neumark, D. , Zhang, J. , & Ciccarela, S. ( 2008). The effects of Wal-Mart on local labor markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 405-430.

16.

Porter, M. ( 2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly , 14, 15-34.

17.

Rosenthal, S. , & Strange, W. ( 2003). Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration . Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 377-393.

18.

Testa, W. ( 2006). Headquarters research and implications for local development . Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 111-116.

19.

Walls & Associates. (2010). National Establishment Time-Series (NETS) database: Database description. Oakland, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.youreconomy.org/nets/NETSDatabaseDescription.pdf